C-172 as tow plane?

On Monday, April 22, 2013 1:35:39 PM UTC-4, Papa3 wrote:
On Monday, April 22, 2013 12:42:03 PM UTC-4, Tony wrote:

On Monday, April 22, 2013 11:24:43 AM UTC-5, Evan Ludeman wrote:



Why the hell does anyone *want* to get towed by the pilot that can't handle a Pawnee? Sorry... I'm just not seeing this as a big impediment. It's about as stable, easy going and docile as any airplane I've flown. Yes, you have to know how to fly TW. So what? The pilot that cares so little for airmanship that he won't get a TW endorsement concerns me a little as tow pilot. T8







maybe they get their airmanship challenge from towing gliders and flying gliders. maybe they would like to get a tailwheel endorsement but they can't afford to buy a taildragger and no tailwheel airplanes within reasonable driving distance are insured for tailwheel training.



Yup - what Tony said. In the US at least, it's not about "real men (or women)" who fly taildraggers. It's just that in many locations, it's not that easy to find enough tailwheel qualified people that meet the demands of the insurance policy, the FBO's requirements, etc. In our club, we used Super Cubs or Scouts just so we had the second seat available so our one or two tailwheel qualified CFIs could do the transition training and signoffs, but not all locations have the luxury of having a two-place towplane...

The difference between Tailwheel and training wheel tow pilot insurance requirements is a TW endorsement and a little TW time. It's a very modest requirement. They are going to want 200 hours SEL time for any high performance tow plane, that's usually the main issue. Wasn't always this way, but Costello revisited this a couple years ago and the requirements went down (a lot) for some of this stuff.

T8