Way off topic, but it has do to with the French

On Tue, 04 Mar 2008 15:32:58 -0800, miguel wrote:

wrote:

miguel a écrit :

NO POOPYTALK!

"John of Aix" wrote:
miguel wrote:
Daedalus wrote:

Why weren't the French involved in this conversation?

Probably because they speak poopytalk.

Pauvre con avec ton langage enfantin. Toi, évidemment, tu ne piges rien
que l'amerloque et, sans doute, t'exprime comme un crétin dans cette
'langue', ainsi tu te sens obligé de montrer à quel point tu es inculte
avec l'utilisation des mots qu'on laisse tomber après la crèche.

C'est un anglais qui te parle, car ici on Europe on considère la culture
d'être une bonne chose.

Usenet would be generally improved if all poopytalkers like John of
Aix would Remove Themselves Altogether.

Usenet would improve if assholes like you would fade away..!!! Go back
to your trailers park, don't forget to get your meds and have a good
sleep..!!!

I'd sleep a lot better of you poopytalkers would Remove Your Poopytalk
from Usenet Altogether.

miguel

PS: I don't suppose you poopytalking morons have ever figured out why
the BIBLE is in ENGLISH, not French Poopytalk.

On Mar 4, 6:36 pm, miguel wrote:
On Tue, 04 Mar 2008 15:32:58 -0800, miguel wrote:
wrote:

miguel a écrit :

NO POOPYTALK!

"John of Aix" wrote:
miguel wrote:
Daedalus wrote:

Why weren't the French involved in this conversation?

Probably because they speak poopytalk.

Pauvre con avec ton langage enfantin. Toi, évidemment, tu ne piges rien
que l'amerloque et, sans doute, t'exprime comme un crétin dans cette
'langue', ainsi tu te sens obligé de montrer à quel point tu es inculte
avec l'utilisation des mots qu'on laisse tomber après la crèche.

C'est un anglais qui te parle, car ici on Europe on considère la culture
d'être une bonne chose.

Usenet would be generally improved if all poopytalkers like John of
Aix would Remove Themselves Altogether.

Usenet would improve if assholes like you would fade away..!!! Go back
to your trailers park, don't forget to get your meds and have a good
sleep..!!!

I'd sleep a lot better of you poopytalkers would Remove Your Poopytalk
from Usenet Altogether.

miguel

PS: I don't suppose you poopytalking morons have ever figured out why
the BIBLE is in ENGLISH, not French Poopytalk.

That would be Hebrew and Greek, miguel.

That's an English name, isn't it -- miguel?

Dan

Dan wrote:
miguel wrote:
miguel wrote:
Some poopytalker:
miguel a écrit :

NO POOPYTALK!

"John of Aix" wrote:
miguel wrote:
Daedalus wrote:

Why weren't the French involved in this conversation?

Probably because they speak poopytalk.

Pauvre con avec ton langage enfantin. Toi, évidemment, tu ne piges rien
que l'amerloque et, sans doute, t'exprime comme un crétin dans cette
'langue', ainsi tu te sens obligé de montrer à quel point tu es inculte
avec l'utilisation des mots qu'on laisse tomber après la crèche.

C'est un anglais qui te parle, car ici on Europe on considère la culture
d'être une bonne chose.

Usenet would be generally improved if all poopytalkers like John of
Aix would Remove Themselves Altogether.

Usenet would improve if assholes like you would fade away..!!! Go back
to your trailers park, don't forget to get your meds and have a good
sleep..!!!

I'd sleep a lot better of you poopytalkers would Remove Your Poopytalk
from Usenet Altogether.

PS: I don't suppose you poopytalking morons have ever figured out why
the BIBLE is in ENGLISH, not French Poopytalk.

That would be Hebrew and Greek, miguel.

It's good it was translated from its original English into Hebrew and
Greek. The Hebrewers and Greeks ought to know about God too.

That's an English name, isn't it -- miguel?

100% american, thank you.

miguel wrote:
On Tue, 04 Mar 2008 15:32:58 -0800, miguel wrote:

wrote:

miguel a écrit :
NO POOPYTALK!

"John of Aix" wrote:
miguel wrote:
Daedalus wrote:
Why weren't the French involved in this conversation?
Probably because they speak poopytalk.
Pauvre con avec ton langage enfantin. Toi, évidemment, tu ne piges rien
que l'amerloque et, sans doute, t'exprime comme un crétin dans cette
'langue', ainsi tu te sens obligé de montrer à quel point tu es inculte
avec l'utilisation des mots qu'on laisse tomber après la crèche.
C'est un anglais qui te parle, car ici on Europe on considère la culture
d'être une bonne chose.
Usenet would be generally improved if all poopytalkers like John of
Aix would Remove Themselves Altogether.
Usenet would improve if assholes like you would fade away..!!! Go back
to your trailers park, don't forget to get your meds and have a good
sleep..!!!
I'd sleep a lot better of you poopytalkers would Remove Your Poopytalk
from Usenet Altogether.
miguel

PS: I don't suppose you poopytalking morons have ever figured out why
the BIBLE is in ENGLISH, not French Poopytalk.

Well, it was in Latin long before it was in
English and Latin is way closer to French
than English...

Jim Stewart wrote:
miguel wrote:
miguel wrote:
Some poopytalker wrote:
miguel a écrit :

NO POOPYTALK!

"John of Aix" wrote:
miguel wrote:
Daedalus wrote:
Why weren't the French involved in this conversation?
Probably because they speak poopytalk.
Pauvre con avec ton langage enfantin. Toi, évidemment, tu ne piges rien
que l'amerloque et, sans doute, t'exprime comme un crétin dans cette
'langue', ainsi tu te sens obligé de montrer à quel point tu es inculte
avec l'utilisation des mots qu'on laisse tomber après la crèche.
C'est un anglais qui te parle, car ici on Europe on considère la culture
d'être une bonne chose.
Usenet would be generally improved if all poopytalkers like John of
Aix would Remove Themselves Altogether.
Usenet would improve if assholes like you would fade away..!!! Go back
to your trailers park, don't forget to get your meds and have a good
sleep..!!!
I'd sleep a lot better of you poopytalkers would Remove Your Poopytalk
from Usenet Altogether.
miguel

PS: I don't suppose you poopytalking morons have ever figured out why
the BIBLE is in ENGLISH, not French Poopytalk.

Well, it was in Latin long before it was in
English and Latin is way closer to French
than English...

I don't know where you get your information, but the very first
version of the Bible was the King James Version.

miguel

On Mar 4, 7:18 pm, miguel wrote:


I don't know where you get your information, but the very first
version of the Bible was the King James Version.

miguel

Wrong.

There were at least six English versions of the Bible before the KJV:

Anglo-Saxon manuscript -- 995 AD
Wycliff -- 1380 AD
Tyndale --1534 AD
Great Bible -- 1539 AD
Geneva -- 1557 AD
Rheims -- 1582 AD

And then the 1st Edition of the King James, published in 1611.

Anything else you need to be corrected on?

Dan

On Mar 4, 7:00 pm, miguel wrote:

It's good it was translated from its original English into Hebrew and
Greek. The Hebrewers and Greeks ought to know about God too.

You mean the Jews? They wrote the books of the Law and the Prophets
which were included in the Bible as the Old Testament.

The common language of the Roman world was Greek, thus the language of
choice for most writers of the New Testament.

Only much later was this entire collection translated into other
languages (since they did not exist at the time of the original
manuscripts), such as English.


Dan

On Tue, 4 Mar 2008 16:27:28 -0800 (PST), Dan
wrote:

On Mar 4, 7:18 pm, miguel wrote:


I don't know where you get your information, but the very first
version of the Bible was the King James Version.

miguel

Wrong.

There were at least six English versions of the Bible before the KJV:

Anglo-Saxon manuscript -- 995 AD
Wycliff -- 1380 AD
Tyndale --1534 AD
Great Bible -- 1539 AD
Geneva -- 1557 AD
Rheims -- 1582 AD

And then the 1st Edition of the King James, published in 1611.

Anything else you need to be corrected on?

Obviously somebody has fed you some very bad information (probably
Satan).

miguel wrote:
Jim Stewart wrote:
miguel wrote:
miguel wrote:
Some poopytalker wrote:
miguel a écrit :

NO POOPYTALK!

"John of Aix" wrote:
miguel wrote:
Daedalus wrote:
Why weren't the French involved in this conversation?
Probably because they speak poopytalk.
Pauvre con avec ton langage enfantin. Toi, évidemment, tu ne piges rien
que l'amerloque et, sans doute, t'exprime comme un crétin dans cette
'langue', ainsi tu te sens obligé de montrer à quel point tu es inculte
avec l'utilisation des mots qu'on laisse tomber après la crèche.
C'est un anglais qui te parle, car ici on Europe on considère la culture
d'être une bonne chose.
Usenet would be generally improved if all poopytalkers like John of
Aix would Remove Themselves Altogether.
Usenet would improve if assholes like you would fade away..!!! Go back
to your trailers park, don't forget to get your meds and have a good
sleep..!!!
I'd sleep a lot better of you poopytalkers would Remove Your Poopytalk
from Usenet Altogether.
miguel

PS: I don't suppose you poopytalking morons have ever figured out why
the BIBLE is in ENGLISH, not French Poopytalk.

Well, it was in Latin long before it was in
English and Latin is way closer to French
than English...

I don't know where you get your information, but the very first
version of the Bible was the King James Version.

Google Vulgate

On Mar 4, 7:51 pm, miguel wrote:
On Tue, 4 Mar 2008 16:27:28 -0800 (PST), Dan
wrote:



On Mar 4, 7:18 pm, miguel wrote:

I don't know where you get your information, but the very first
version of the Bible was the King James Version.

miguel

Wrong.

There were at least six English versions of the Bible before the KJV:

Anglo-Saxon manuscript -- 995 AD
Wycliff -- 1380 AD
Tyndale --1534 AD
Great Bible -- 1539 AD
Geneva -- 1557 AD
Rheims -- 1582 AD

And then the 1st Edition of the King James, published in 1611.

Anything else you need to be corrected on?

Obviously somebody has fed you some very bad information (probably
Satan).

Must be so. I'll ask him...

Miguel? Is it so??