If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#61
|
|||
|
|||
Will the new government have any effect on GA?
Skylune writes:
Sorry all, for the brief return visit. MX's allusion to Orwell's book might work a bit better had it not been for the 9/11/01 terrorist attacks, which were not illusory to those of us who worked in NYC at the time. Those attacks were much more damaging psychologically than in any other way, which was precisely the intent. Terrorists don't have the means to do much real damage, so they have to settle for spectacular and isolated incidents and rely on the resulting hysteria to do their work for them. If they had the means to do real damage themselves, they'd be military forces, not terrorists. Organizations with established military forces don't need terrorists. And for the very real terrorist attacks going on elsewhere, every day. How many terrorist attacks have there been in the United States since 2001? Comparing the current state of affairs to the book, "1984," where all these fictitious wars against Eurasia and Eastasia, is kind of weird. I wish that were true. Funny that a guy from France talks about freedom of speech, when over there the politicians are more afraid of offending Islamists than even the Democrats here. The flavors of censorship are different, but the trends are unfortunately the same. But the people are kept afraid, so that they never question the loss of liberty. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#62
|
|||
|
|||
Will the new government have any effect on GA?
On 14 Nov 2006 16:18:53 -0800, "Marc Adler"
wrote: I don't know how you can blame the Democrats since all three branches of govt were dominated by Republicans. To be fair, the GOP only really controlled the executive branch. That being President Bush. In the Congress, the GOP did control the House, but has never had a working majority in the Senate. They did get to chair committees, but there were always enough RINOS (Republicans In Name Only) like Snow, Chafee, Hagel and others on any issue to prevent a successful legislative agenda in Congress. Likewise, thought a majority of the Justices on the Supreme Court were appointed by Republicans, most were confirmed by Democrat controlled Senates and previous Presidents didn't even try, after Bork, to appoint a Justice who stuck to original intent in interpreting the Constitution as that does not pass the Democrat litmus test on Roe V Wade. (You could argue whether the principles of Roe are correct, but there is no rational argument that the decision was not legislation from the bench) So, in effect, only Scalia, Thomas, Alito and Roberts are Justices as the GOP would choose them. The rest are either far left liberals like Ginsburg or White or RINO justices like Souter and Kennedy. There has never been an original intent Supreme Court in our lifetimes. So, the GOP has its sins to pay for, but to claim they ever had a free hand to implement their policies is ludicrous. Don Virginia - the only State with a flag rated "R" for partial nudity and graphic violence. |
#63
|
|||
|
|||
Will the new government have any effect on GA?
Recently, Don Tabor posted:
On 14 Nov 2006 16:18:53 -0800, "Marc Adler" wrote: I don't know how you can blame the Democrats since all three branches of govt were dominated by Republicans. To be fair, the GOP only really controlled the executive branch. That being President Bush. [...] So, the GOP has its sins to pay for, but to claim they ever had a free hand to implement their policies is ludicrous. Just whose policies _were_ implemented, given that the Democrats couldn't even get their policies presented for a vote? Get real. Neil |
#64
|
|||
|
|||
Will the new government have any effect on GA?
On Thu, 16 Nov 2006 17:58:52 GMT, "Neil Gould"
wrote: So, the GOP has its sins to pay for, but to claim they ever had a free hand to implement their policies is ludicrous. Just whose policies _were_ implemented, given that the Democrats couldn't even get their policies presented for a vote? Get real. No one's policies got implemented. Hardly anything at all has gotten done other than bipartisan pork barrel spending. Go ahead, name one major domestic program change since the original tax cuts. Social Security Reform died. Renewed offshore and inshore oil exploration blocked. Medicare reform replaced by a prescription drug program that was more than the GOP wanted but less than they feared Dems might get if they didn't pass it. Fundamental tax reform studied to death and nothing done. The last 4 years have been little more than housekeeping with no major programs advanced beyond committee. Don DonSideB Build a man a fire and you keep him warm for a day, Set a man on fire and he will be warm for the rest of his life. |
#65
|
|||
|
|||
Will the new government have any effect on GA?
"Neil Gould" wrote in message t... Recently, Don Tabor posted: On 14 Nov 2006 16:18:53 -0800, "Marc Adler" wrote: I don't know how you can blame the Democrats since all three branches of govt were dominated by Republicans. To be fair, the GOP only really controlled the executive branch. That being President Bush. [...] So, the GOP has its sins to pay for, but to claim they ever had a free hand to implement their policies is ludicrous. Just whose policies _were_ implemented, given that the Democrats couldn't even get their policies presented for a vote? Get real. Neil A *******ization of the two which is pretty much what our government has been since, well, forever. |
#66
|
|||
|
|||
Will the new government have any effect on GA?
"DonSideB" wrote in message ... On Thu, 16 Nov 2006 17:58:52 GMT, "Neil Gould" wrote: So, the GOP has its sins to pay for, but to claim they ever had a free hand to implement their policies is ludicrous. Just whose policies _were_ implemented, given that the Democrats couldn't even get their policies presented for a vote? Get real. No one's policies got implemented. Hardly anything at all has gotten done other than bipartisan pork barrel spending. Go ahead, name one major domestic program change since the original tax cuts. Social Security Reform died. Renewed offshore and inshore oil exploration blocked. Medicare reform replaced by a prescription drug program that was more than the GOP wanted but less than they feared Dems might get if they didn't pass it. Fundamental tax reform studied to death and nothing done. The last 4 years have been little more than housekeeping with no major programs advanced beyond committee. Don And this is a good thing. For an even better example look at the majority of the Clinton administration. Dem in the White House and a mixed Congress. Nothing major got passed and no one was really worried about anything getting passed. The country had a great time and rode the dot com bubble for about as long as any bubble could ever hold together. Let's face it, the country is 276 years old do we really need any more laws? |
#67
|
|||
|
|||
Will the new government have any effect on GA?
On Thu, 16 Nov 2006 13:40:37 -0600, "Gig 601XL Builder"
wrDOTgiaconaATcox.net wrote: Let's face it, the country is 276 years old do we really need any more laws? Yes, HR 25 Don |
#68
|
|||
|
|||
Will the new government have any effect on GA?
"Don Tabor" wrote in message ... On Thu, 16 Nov 2006 13:40:37 -0600, "Gig 601XL Builder" wrDOTgiaconaATcox.net wrote: Let's face it, the country is 276 years old do we really need any more laws? Yes, HR 25 Don Don't hold your breath. |
#69
|
|||
|
|||
Will the new government have any effect on GA?
Isn't that the Fair Tax bill?
"Don Tabor" wrote in message ... | On Thu, 16 Nov 2006 13:40:37 -0600, "Gig 601XL Builder" | wrDOTgiaconaATcox.net wrote: | | Let's face it, the country is 276 years old do we really need any more laws? | | Yes, HR 25 | | Don | | |
#70
|
|||
|
|||
Will the new government have any effect on GA?
On Thu, 16 Nov 2006 13:40:37 -0600, Gig 601XL Builder wrote:
Let's face it, the country is 276 years old do we really need any more laws? It's what I've been saying for a long time -- laws should automatically expire after a year and the politicians should have to debate and pass them again if they want them to be renewed... At the very least, it should keep them busy enough that only the important ones are kept around and they have less time to come up with new bull**** ones... Sometimes, the best thing that the legislature can do is do nothing... -- "Is it possible for the voices in my head to use email from now on?" |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
UAV's and TFR's along the Mexico boarder | John Doe | Piloting | 145 | March 31st 06 06:58 PM |
Washington DC airspace closing for good? | tony roberts | Piloting | 153 | August 11th 05 12:56 AM |
Hey! What fun!! Let's let them kill ourselves!!! | [email protected] | Naval Aviation | 2 | December 17th 04 09:45 PM |
Pilot's Political Orientation | Chicken Bone | Piloting | 533 | June 29th 04 12:47 AM |
Bu$h Jr's Iran-Contra -- The Pentagone's Reign of Terror | PirateJohn | Military Aviation | 1 | September 6th 03 10:05 AM |