Left can't read well nor do they understand Constitution

On Fri, 16 Jan 2004 09:03:20 -0600, charles krin
wrote:


Chuckle...Colin didn't say that...he said that usually a summons to
appear before a federal magistrate was issued for minor problems...and
if the problem wasn't minor, then the offender was held pending arrest
by either the FBI or the US Marshals.

He needs to improve his reading comprehension skills.



"It's not American foreign policy, or the plight of the
Palestinians, or America's longstanding support for Israel.
A group of people with money and weaponry have simply
decided that we, as a civilization, are unfit to live, and
want, eventally, to exterminate us."
'Christian Century' magazine

In article ,
says...
Second, the militray doesn't have the legal right to arrest the President,
and I challenge anyone to demonstrate otherwise.

In less enlightened societies, this is regular practice, and is called
a coup.



A few countries come to mind, Liberia, Argentina, France, Russia ........

To mention a few with a past history..

--
When dealing with propaganda terminology one sometimes always speaks in
variable absolutes. This is not to be mistaken for an unbiased slant.

In article et,
says...

"The Raven" wrote in message
...

Here's a hypothetical. Foreign teenager caught at nuclear storage facility
doing nothing more than shooting rats at the facility rubbish dump (not a
specifically "secure" area). What's going to happen to him/her?


Well, according to Colin Campbell, who spent a year pulling 'Military Police
Duty Officer' 3-4x a month at Ft Lewis not long ago and got to be an expert
on jurisdictional issues, he won't be arrested. I guess that leaves
"nothing" or "he/she will be shot" as the only alternatives.


I can see you arn't reading what he wrote, or refuse to acknoledge it.

--
When dealing with propaganda terminology one sometimes always speaks in
variable absolutes. This is not to be mistaken for an unbiased slant.

On Fri, 16 Jan 2004 09:27:21 -0800, "Tarver Engineering"
wrote:


Military police are not trained to collect evidence for a civilian
prosecution and therefore they wait for help in these matters. The person
is already arrested when the military seizes them, but the military police
are not trained for an investigation leading to a conviction, in civilian
courts.

'Arrest' is a specific legal status. A person detained by military
authorities is _not_ under arrest. And even in detaining somebody
there are specific legal rules that must be followed - or else the
detention turns into the felony of 'false arrest.'



"It's not American foreign policy, or the plight of the
Palestinians, or America's longstanding support for Israel.
A group of people with money and weaponry have simply
decided that we, as a civilization, are unfit to live, and
want, eventally, to exterminate us."
'Christian Century' magazine

"Colin Campbell" (remove underscore) wrote in
message ...
On Fri, 16 Jan 2004 09:27:21 -0800, "Tarver Engineering"
wrote:


Military police are not trained to collect evidence for a civilian
prosecution and therefore they wait for help in these matters. The
person
is already arrested when the military seizes them, but the military
police
are not trained for an investigation leading to a conviction, in civilian
courts.

'Arrest' is a specific legal status. A person detained by military
authorities is _not_ under arrest.

Tell that to the boys at gitmo.

And even in detaining somebody
there are specific legal rules that must be followed - or else the
detention turns into the felony of 'false arrest.'

That is because it is an arrest.

Semantics - 'arrest' in its legal sense is a precise term. 'Crime
prevention' is an act that can be performed by any person, military or
civilian. For instance, are you just going to ignore something like a
mugger beating up a grandmother? Or, as in Florida, where two geezers
simultaneously offed an armed robber sticking up the restaurant and
interrupting their lunches. (They were sitting at different tables.)
Better make the correct decision, though.
Walt BJ

"charles krin" wrote in message
...

Chuckle...Colin didn't say that...he said that usually a summons to
appear before a federal magistrate was issued for minor problems...and
if the problem wasn't minor, then the offender was held pending arrest
by either the FBI or the US Marshals.


Well, if they're being held, they've been arrested. That's what "arrest"
means!

"Colin Campbell" (remove underscore) wrote in
message ...

Did you read what I posted?


Yup.

"RTO Trainer" wrote in message
om...

Of course they do. They just don't have the power to arrest him.


I suggest you look up the word "arrest".

"Colin Campbell" (remove underscore) wrote in
message ...

'Arrest' is a specific legal status. A person detained by military
authorities is _not_ under arrest. And even in detaining somebody
there are specific legal rules that must be followed - or else the
detention turns into the felony of 'false arrest.'


You are mistaken. I suggest you look up the word "arrest".