I need to trace an IP address

Buttman wrote in
:

On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 21:15:58 -0400, Dudley Henriques sayeth:

Buttman wrote:
On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 17:41:50 -0400, Dudley Henriques sayeth:
Nice try but not really a very good twist on the real situation.
The quote you have presented here without the accompanying text
that completes the post was written ONLY after the bio was attacked
by another poster. In other words, the information about the bio
was NOT used until it was mentioned negatively by someone else and
in response to what was said.


And that changes things, how? One day someone accuses your article
of being crap, you defend it. The next day someone else call it crap
by flagging it, and now you inform the wikipedia admins that you
agree it should be deleted?

You CAN'T be this stupid! But.........:-)

Unnecessary comment. Shows REAL agenda here. You REALLY need some
lessons in how to nail people.


Who the **** would want to nail you? Your head on my trophy wall would
look rather insignificant.


Bertie

Buttman wrote in news:furcr6$cs2$2
@registered.motzarella.org:

On Fri, 25 Apr 2008 01:31:00 +0000, Buttman sayeth:

On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 17:28:34 -0700, gatt sayeth:

I'm curious: It's clear that you have some sort of personal issue
with
Dudley, but WTF does it have to do with rec.aviation.piloting?

I don't know. I'm not the one who made this thread. What does tracing
an
IP have to do with piloting?

He's given me some great advice here that has been very useful
toward
my IFR, Commercial and CFI training and understanding, and I have no
doubt that he's been a great help to other folks on the forums
because
they've said so.

I just don't see it. All I ever see him post is either pointless one
liners, or a 5 paragraph post filled with convoluted sentence
structures
and odd formal tones to make the post sound smarter than it really
is,
but in the end all he ever does is, at best, state the obvious. He's
the
perfect example of the type of person who may have done good things
in
the past, but has fallen victim to his own hype.

I mean, he wrote his own god damn wikipedia entry for petes sake.
He's
the type of person who would instruct in his will to have a monument
build honoring him after he does, paid by his own estate (ala Evel
Knievel).

People like that just amuse me. I think it's fun to mess with them
and
watch them try to rationalize their actions. "Oh I didn't write it as
a
vanity article, I wrote it as a service to my millions of fans that
fill
my fan-club office's mailbox with requests to hear my exciting life
story. Huh? Whats that, someone doesn't like my article and thinks it
should be deleted? Oh well thats OK because it's not really needed
anymore anyways..." Freaking hilarious.


I definately can't say that others here, know what I mean?

-c
CP-ASEL-IA

You're saying Dudly is the only person here who makes worthwile
posts?

I don't know if this is showing up more than once, but I only meant to
send it once



We understand. it;'s the jerking off thing.

Bertie

On Fri, 25 Apr 2008 01:31:00 +0000, Buttman sayeth:

On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 17:28:34 -0700, gatt sayeth:

I'm curious: It's clear that you have some sort of personal issue with
Dudley, but WTF does it have to do with rec.aviation.piloting?

I don't know. I'm not the one who made this thread. What does tracing an
IP have to do with piloting?

He's given me some great advice here that has been very useful toward
my IFR, Commercial and CFI training and understanding, and I have no
doubt that he's been a great help to other folks on the forums because
they've said so.

I just don't see it. All I ever see him post is either pointless one
liners, or a 5 paragraph post filled with convoluted sentence structures
and odd formal tones to make the post sound smarter than it really is,
but in the end all he ever does is, at best, state the obvious. He's the
perfect example of the type of person who may have done good things in
the past, but has fallen victim to his own hype.

I mean, he wrote his own god damn wikipedia entry for petes sake. He's
the type of person who would instruct in his will to have a monument
build honoring him after he does, paid by his own estate (ala Evel
Knievel).

People like that just amuse me. I think it's fun to mess with them and
watch them try to rationalize their actions. "Oh I didn't write it as a
vanity article, I wrote it as a service to my millions of fans that fill
my fan-club office's mailbox with requests to hear my exciting life
story. Huh? Whats that, someone doesn't like my article and thinks it
should be deleted? Oh well thats OK because it's not really needed
anymore anyways..." Freaking hilarious.


I definately can't say that others here, know what I mean?

-c
CP-ASEL-IA

You're saying Dudly is the only person here who makes worthwile posts?

I don't know if this is showing up more than once, but I only meant to
send it once

Dudley Henriques wrote in
:

Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
You should stop jerking off while you hit "send"



Bertie

I think it's anger :-)) He wants to make sure EVERYBODY notices it :-))
D


that can be arranged!

Bertie

Buttman wrote:
On Fri, 25 Apr 2008 01:31:00 +0000, Buttman sayeth:

On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 17:28:34 -0700, gatt sayeth:
I'm curious: It's clear that you have some sort of personal issue with
Dudley, but WTF does it have to do with rec.aviation.piloting?
I don't know. I'm not the one who made this thread. What does tracing an
IP have to do with piloting?

He's given me some great advice here that has been very useful toward
my IFR, Commercial and CFI training and understanding, and I have no
doubt that he's been a great help to other folks on the forums because
they've said so.
I just don't see it. All I ever see him post is either pointless one
liners, or a 5 paragraph post filled with convoluted sentence structures
and odd formal tones to make the post sound smarter than it really is,
but in the end all he ever does is, at best, state the obvious. He's the
perfect example of the type of person who may have done good things in
the past, but has fallen victim to his own hype.

I mean, he wrote his own god damn wikipedia entry for petes sake. He's
the type of person who would instruct in his will to have a monument
build honoring him after he does, paid by his own estate (ala Evel
Knievel).

People like that just amuse me. I think it's fun to mess with them and
watch them try to rationalize their actions. "Oh I didn't write it as a
vanity article, I wrote it as a service to my millions of fans that fill
my fan-club office's mailbox with requests to hear my exciting life
story. Huh? Whats that, someone doesn't like my article and thinks it
should be deleted? Oh well thats OK because it's not really needed
anymore anyways..." Freaking hilarious.


I definately can't say that others here, know what I mean?

-c
CP-ASEL-IA
You're saying Dudly is the only person here who makes worthwile posts?

I don't know if this is showing up more than once, but I only meant to
send it once

A hand this nervous should be REAL careful shutting down a fuel selector
on takeoff with his student don't you think? :-)
DH

it hit mine spot on

"Jay Maynard" wrote in message
...
On 2008-04-24, Jim Logajan wrote:
Nomen Nescio wrote:
http://whatismyipaddress.com/
I'll try to remember that web site - though it places my own IP address
in
Eugene Oregon - about 20 miles from where I really live.

It places me in Minneapolis, about 125 miles wrong.
--
Jay Maynard, K5ZC http://www.conmicro.com
http://jmaynard.livejournal.com http://www.tronguy.net
Fairmont, MN (FRM) (Yes, that's me!)
AMD Zodiac CH601XLi N55ZC (ordered 17 March, delivery 2 June)

Buttman wrote:
On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 21:15:58 -0400, Dudley Henriques sayeth:

Buttman wrote:
On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 17:41:50 -0400, Dudley Henriques sayeth:
Nice try but not really a very good twist on the real situation. The
quote you have presented here without the accompanying text that
completes the post was written ONLY after the bio was attacked by
another poster. In other words, the information about the bio was NOT
used until it was mentioned negatively by someone else and in response
to what was said.


And that changes things, how? One day someone accuses your article of
being crap, you defend it. The next day someone else call it crap by
flagging it, and now you inform the wikipedia admins that you agree it
should be deleted?
You CAN'T be this stupid! But.........:-)

Unnecessary comment. Shows REAL agenda here. You REALLY need some
lessons in how to nail people. You're way too obvious with statements
like this one. It fairly shouts that you have "other issues" with the
person you're addressing. In my case, you seem to be harboring a bit of
issue over that run in we had a while back when I told you you were the
worst CFI I've ever encountered on Usenet. :-)

It doesn't matter really.

Oh, no. It doesn't matter at all. *make a thread asking for help tracing
the IP of the person who deleted my wiki page*


All you have succeeded in doing is to remind me the article is no longer
needed.
If you wish to consider this some sort of victory, please do so.
As for my asking that the bio be deleted; that decision was made for
the exact reasons given and has nothing whatsoever to do with
Wikipedia.
Oh, I see. Its just a coincidence that you decide to remove your self-
written vanity article less than 12 hours after somebody with a
roadrunner connection in El Paso (which may or may not be me) decides
to flag it as against the wikipedia guidelines.
No, as I said, it was NOT coincidence. The "activity" here on the forum
coupled with realizing that the article was being used as a hammer as
you have done here simply keyed my actions to go to Wiki. To tell you
the truth, until Mxsmanic's post, I had virtually forgotten the article
was there. You can verify that by searching for the last time I
mentioned it on Usenet. In fact, I think I'm fairly safe in telling you
that what you will find are very few if any times I have mentioned the
Wiki article unless someone else mentioned it first; which of course
shoots a rather large hole in your "self importance" theory.

It doesn't matter how many times you have mentioned it in the last year,
the point id you wrote your own damn wikipedia article. I find it funny
how you repeatedly can't grasp why this is so humorous to people my me
and apparently mxsmanic who see you as nothing but a parody of the kind
of person you claim to be.

It's especially funny because the article reads exactly like your posts
here. Nothing but half-assed claims of notoriety alongside substance-less
fluff all wrapped up in image-conscious tone.

Whatever. I should point out however that fortunately for me, you and
Mxsmanic seem to be fairly alone with all this bull ****.

Personally, my main interest in you is that you claim to be an
instructor who has shut down a fuel selector valve on a student to
"teach him" about engine failures on takeoff.

Apparently you and I will be meeting fairly regularly on these forums as
you post concerning flight instruction. Any "disagreement" we might have
will I'm sure be judged by others for any missing accuracy or attempts
at "self importance". That seems fair enough to me.
I believe I'll just go with that :-)
DH

Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
Dudley Henriques wrote in
:

Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
You should stop jerking off while you hit "send"



Bertie
I think it's anger :-)) He wants to make sure EVERYBODY notices it :-))
D


that can be arranged!

Bertie


He IS a real trip isn't he? Oh well...goes with Usenet I guess. :-)
D

Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
Buttman wrote in news:furcr6$cs2$2
@registered.motzarella.org:

On Fri, 25 Apr 2008 01:31:00 +0000, Buttman sayeth:

On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 17:28:34 -0700, gatt sayeth:
I'm curious: It's clear that you have some sort of personal issue
with
Dudley, but WTF does it have to do with rec.aviation.piloting?
I don't know. I'm not the one who made this thread. What does tracing
an
IP have to do with piloting?

He's given me some great advice here that has been very useful
toward
my IFR, Commercial and CFI training and understanding, and I have no
doubt that he's been a great help to other folks on the forums
because
they've said so.
I just don't see it. All I ever see him post is either pointless one
liners, or a 5 paragraph post filled with convoluted sentence
structures
and odd formal tones to make the post sound smarter than it really
is,
but in the end all he ever does is, at best, state the obvious. He's
the
perfect example of the type of person who may have done good things
in
the past, but has fallen victim to his own hype.

I mean, he wrote his own god damn wikipedia entry for petes sake.
He's
the type of person who would instruct in his will to have a monument
build honoring him after he does, paid by his own estate (ala Evel
Knievel).

People like that just amuse me. I think it's fun to mess with them
and
watch them try to rationalize their actions. "Oh I didn't write it as
a
vanity article, I wrote it as a service to my millions of fans that
fill
my fan-club office's mailbox with requests to hear my exciting life
story. Huh? Whats that, someone doesn't like my article and thinks it
should be deleted? Oh well thats OK because it's not really needed
anymore anyways..." Freaking hilarious.


I definately can't say that others here, know what I mean?

-c
CP-ASEL-IA
You're saying Dudly is the only person here who makes worthwile
posts?
I don't know if this is showing up more than once, but I only meant to
send it once



We understand. it;'s the jerking off thing.

Bertie

At least he seems to have the situation well in hand :-)
D

Dudley Henriques wrote in
:

Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
Dudley Henriques wrote in
:

Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
You should stop jerking off while you hit "send"



Bertie
I think it's anger :-)) He wants to make sure EVERYBODY notices it
:-))
D


that can be arranged!

Bertie


He IS a real trip isn't he? Oh well...goes with Usenet I guess. :-)

It's what i like about it best..He's entertaining, but not especially
so. He's definitely kicking it up a notch with this latest ****, ghough.


Bertie