A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Home Built
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Equal Power (not!)



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old April 25th 06, 03:44 AM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Equal Power (not!)

To All:

When two identical engines are turning at the same rpm it does NOT mean
they are producing the same amount of power. It is the LOAD on the
engine that determines how much power is being produced at a particular
rpm, not the rpm itself.

For an automobile engine converted for flight the handiest 'load-meter'
is a simple vacuum gauge attached to the intake manifold.

Converted car engines, from the Volkswagen to the Reo (yes, 'Reo' with
an R) do not have a set of factory specs telling you how well they
perform as an AIRCRAFT powerplant. Fortunately, an engine can't lie.
Attach a few instruments, determine your local atmosphere and let her
rip -- the engine will tell you how much power it can produce when
fitted with a given prop.

-------------------------------------

In the same vein, be damn careful about DEFINING the prop. Most
home-builders have the idea that when it comes to props, diameter and
pitch is all you need to know. Alas, with only those two factors you
can miss by a mile. In addition to its diameter and the geometrical
pitch of its blades, in order to define the LOAD a particular prop will
impose you need to know the weight of the prop, the total area of the
blades, and how that area is distributed relative to the prop's
diameter.

Lemme give you an example: You can take a "54x42" prop that needs a
140cid engine to spin it 3200 rpm and shave that puppy down to a
tooth-pick that will turn 3200rpm on the nose of a stock (96cid) VW
engine. But it won't fly the plane, a fact you'll discover the instant
you're out of ground effect.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

It's really all about thrust, as in the Production Of. But folks tend
to hear what they WANT to hear, whereas the engine, the prop and the
airframe can only respond to the reality of physics, mechanics and
aerodynamics.

Vast Mystery, of course. Or at least, half-vast.

-R.S.Hoover

  #2  
Old April 25th 06, 03:50 AM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Equal Power (not!)

To All:

When two identical engines are turning at the same rpm it does NOT mean
they are producing the same amount of power. It is the LOAD on the
engine that determines how much power is being produced at a particular
rpm, not the rpm itself.

For an automobile engine converted for flight the handiest 'load-meter'
is a simple vacuum gauge attached to the intake manifold.

Converted car engines, from the Volkswagen to the Reo (yes, 'Reo' with
an R) do not have a set of factory specs telling you how well they
perform as an AIRCRAFT powerplant. Fortunately, an engine can't lie.
Attach a few instruments, determine your local atmosphere and let her
rip -- the engine will tell you how much power it can produce when
fitted with a given prop.

-------------------------------------

In the same vein, be damn careful about DEFINING the prop. Most
home-builders have the idea that when it comes to props, diameter and
pitch is all you need to know. Alas, with only those two factors you
can miss by a mile. In addition to its diameter and the geometrical
pitch of its blades, in order to define the LOAD a particular prop will
impose you need to know the weight of the prop, the total area of the
blades, and how that area is distributed relative to the prop's
diameter.

Lemme give you an example: You can take a "54x42" prop that needs a
140cid engine to spin it 3200 rpm and shave that puppy down to a
tooth-pick that will turn 3200rpm on the nose of a stock (96cid) VW
engine. But it won't fly the plane, a fact you'll discover the instant
you're out of ground effect.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

---

It's really all about thrust, as in the Production Of. But folks tend
to hear what they WANT to hear, whereas the engine, the prop and the
airframe can only respond to the reality of physics, mechanics and
aerodynamics.

Vast Mystery, of course. Or at least, half-vast.

-R.S.Hoover

I am not exactly how to define "weight of the prop", but the rest need to be
said and repeated. Thanks for posting.

Peter


  #3  
Old April 25th 06, 04:49 PM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Equal Power (not!)

wrote:
To All:

When two identical engines are turning at the same rpm it does NOT mean
they are producing the same amount of power. It is the LOAD on the
engine that determines how much power is being produced at a particular
rpm, not the rpm itself.

For an automobile engine converted for flight the handiest 'load-meter'
is a simple vacuum gauge attached to the intake manifold.

Converted car engines, from the Volkswagen to the Reo (yes, 'Reo' with
an R) do not have a set of factory specs telling you how well they
perform as an AIRCRAFT powerplant. Fortunately, an engine can't lie.
Attach a few instruments, determine your local atmosphere and let her
rip -- the engine will tell you how much power it can produce when
fitted with a given prop.

-------------------------------------

In the same vein, be damn careful about DEFINING the prop. Most
home-builders have the idea that when it comes to props, diameter and
pitch is all you need to know. Alas, with only those two factors you
can miss by a mile. In addition to its diameter and the geometrical
pitch of its blades, in order to define the LOAD a particular prop will
impose you need to know the weight of the prop, the total area of the
blades, and how that area is distributed relative to the prop's
diameter.

Lemme give you an example: You can take a "54x42" prop that needs a
140cid engine to spin it 3200 rpm and shave that puppy down to a
tooth-pick that will turn 3200rpm on the nose of a stock (96cid) VW
engine. But it won't fly the plane, a fact you'll discover the instant
you're out of ground effect.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

It's really all about thrust, as in the Production Of. But folks tend
to hear what they WANT to hear, whereas the engine, the prop and the
airframe can only respond to the reality of physics, mechanics and
aerodynamics.

Vast Mystery, of course. Or at least, half-vast.

-R.S.Hoover

So, is there an equation or series of equations where one can calculate
thrust?

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Another thing I'm puzzled about: this time power settings and altitude. xerj Piloting 8 October 4th 05 12:40 PM
Are you gliding when you touch down? John Doe Piloting 29 January 23rd 05 12:52 AM
eScrew OWNS YOU!!! [email protected] Soaring 0 December 20th 04 09:24 AM
Winch Experts wanted Ulrich Neumann Soaring 117 April 5th 04 06:52 AM
#1 Jet of World War II Christopher Military Aviation 203 September 1st 03 03:04 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:39 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.