If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#51
|
|||
|
|||
"Sport Pilot" wrote in message
oups.com... HELLO! It's just the friggin usenet! Most of us don't even know who we are talking too. Some of us have more important things to do, such as correspondance on a 10 million dollor project. You bet that baby gets proofread, spell checked, grammer checked, proofread, maybe ask a co worker to proofread it, see what I missed, etc. You want fry's with dat? Rich S. |
#52
|
|||
|
|||
Don Stauffer wrote: Sport Pilot wrote: The Diesel is not an Otto cycle it is a completly differant cycle. The Diesel is a constant pressure cycle where the presure is constant through the expansion phase. I wouldn't say the ENTIRE expansion phase. That would not be that great for efficiency- sort of like a steam engine running with no cutoff. And if one injects fuel into the cylinder at the instant just before BDC, that fuel would be pretty much wasted. I was under the impression that the cycle would look something like the steam (Rankine) cycle in that the way Diesel envisoned it it would be either constant enthalpy or constant pressure of part of the expansion phase, adiabatic during the rest. The point where it changed would correspond to what would be the throttle opening on a steam or SI engine. At full "throttle" the changeover would be late in stroke, light load early in stroke. Where did I say the entire expansion phase? Where did I say there was a perfect Diesel cycle? |
#53
|
|||
|
|||
Morgans wrote: "Sport Pilot" wrote in message oups.com... So what I often transpose letters. I don't spend time proofreading something as trivial as a usenet messsage. Yur lak of ettension tu detale makes ti seam lik yu dounut giv a dam. Ti si knot heard too tack a secant adn pruff reed a poust. -- Jim in NC As long as I get 90% or so right, I really don't give a damn. |
#54
|
|||
|
|||
karel wrote: "ower" wrote in message ... "Morgans" skrev i meddelandet ... True, but _everyone_ can take the time to re-read their post, and everyone can learn basic rules, like their-there, to-too-two. By not doing that, people that can't spell _do_ look like morons. They should run spell check if'in they know they have a speeling problem, also. -- Jim in NC So I am a moron if my spelling isnt correct? I am afraid you did not take the full meaning of the msg. It was not said that people who can't spell errorfree are morons. Really not! What was said is that people who have difficulties with spelling (one such difficulty may be dyslexia) will _look like_ morons if they don't take the trouble to correct for their weakness. There's no blame in committing errors, who errs never? But we should be humble about them and hence try to avoid them In this case, by proofreading our msgs and correcting the errors we detect. Karel (closer to SE than to US) Sooo, why did you get so upset a few posts back there? Like my misspelling of diesel was sooo important? |
#55
|
|||
|
|||
|
#56
|
|||
|
|||
"Sport Pilot" wrote Some of us have more important things to do, such as correspondance on a 10 million dollor project. Your attitude makes me wonder why you are in "only usenet." Nice of you to come and play with us mortals. Good luck. You will need it, an it won't be from me. Plonk -- Jim in NC |
#57
|
|||
|
|||
In article .com,
"Sport Pilot" wrote: HELLO! It's just the friggin usenet! Most of us don't even know who we are talking too. Some of us have more important things to do, such as correspondance on a 10 million dollor project. You bet that baby gets proofread, spell checked, grammer checked, proofread, maybe ask a co worker to proofread it, see what I missed, etc. Hello? You mean "to," (a preposition and therefore a word with which you ought not end a sentence, anyway) "correspondence," "dollar," and "grammar?" I'm not picking on you, particularly, but the pervasive ignorance of spelling, grammar, punctuation, homonyms, sentence construction, ad infinitum, makes me ****ing sick. And it isn't just usenet, it's everywhere, even in your ten million dollar report, because your computer can't fix everything and your coworkers are as apathetic as you are. We're becoming a nation of ignorant idiots. I think that's a bad thing, and a dangerous one. If we knew as little about airplanes as we did the English language, and flew them as carelessly as we write, we'd all be dead by now. |
#58
|
|||
|
|||
"Morgans" skrev i meddelandet ... Good luck. You will need it, an it won't be from me. Plonk About spellig, an it won't. An? And? Have a nice day Owe from SE |
#59
|
|||
|
|||
Actually, it is Otto, as in 4-stroke spark ignition.
Dude, MJC was Joking |
#60
|
|||
|
|||
Yea me two! 90% spelling accuracy on Usenet is what should be
acepted without comment! My opinion. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
2-stroke diesel is the (near) future? | Max Kallio | Home Built | 134 | July 18th 05 12:39 AM |
BSFC vs gas mileage, 2 stroke vs 4 stroke | Jay | Home Built | 10 | August 24th 04 02:26 PM |
Diesel Jodel information..........and .........diesel plane groups | Roland M | Home Built | 1 | January 4th 04 04:04 AM |
Diesel engines for Planes Yahoo Group Jodel Diesel is Isuzu Citroen Peugeot | Roland M | Home Built | 3 | September 13th 03 12:44 AM |
Diesel engines for Planes Yahoo Group Jodel Diesel is Isuzu Citroen Peugeot | Roland M | Rotorcraft | 2 | September 13th 03 12:44 AM |