A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

SSA INVESTIGATION



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old September 10th 06, 02:50 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Nyal Williams
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 215
Default SSA INVESTIGATION

Bad link.


At 13:06 10 September 2006, Skysoar wrote:

Mike Schumann wrote:
When you have an organization of this size, the back
office is a real
problem. The group is too large to run with volunteers,
but barely big
enough where professional management is efficient
and affordable.

That is the advantage of becoming affiliated with
a larger organization,
whether it is the EAA, AOPA or someone else. It provides
an opportunity to
leverage the existing professional back office infrastructure
of that
organization, so that the SSA volunteers can focus
on what they love:
soaring.


It may be that what the SSA needs is professional management,
but I
would submit that the mangaement not be under the EAA
or AOPA umbrella
(umbrellas don't protect you in ill winds). I'd bet
most people have
never heard of an association management company (AMC).
The AMC model
of association management may be just what an association
of SSA's size
and type of governance needs. You have economies of
scale on your side
with an AMC. For more info on AMCs: www.iaamc.org.





  #22  
Old September 10th 06, 02:51 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Nyal Williams
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 215
Default SSA INVESTIGATION

Bad link.


At 13:06 10 September 2006, Skysoar wrote:

Mike Schumann wrote:
When you have an organization of this size, the back
office is a real
problem. The group is too large to run with volunteers,
but barely big
enough where professional management is efficient
and affordable.

That is the advantage of becoming affiliated with
a larger organization,
whether it is the EAA, AOPA or someone else. It provides
an opportunity to
leverage the existing professional back office infrastructure
of that
organization, so that the SSA volunteers can focus
on what they love:
soaring.


It may be that what the SSA needs is professional management,
but I
would submit that the mangaement not be under the EAA
or AOPA umbrella
(umbrellas don't protect you in ill winds). I'd bet
most people have
never heard of an association management company (AMC).
The AMC model
of association management may be just what an association
of SSA's size
and type of governance needs. You have economies of
scale on your side
with an AMC. For more info on AMCs: www.iaamc.org.





  #23  
Old September 10th 06, 10:50 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
SkySoar
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3
Default SSA INVESTIGATION


Nyal Williams wrote:
Bad link.

That's odd...it works when I click on it. Try typing it directly into
your browser's address bar instead.

Bob

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Air Force One Had to Intercept Some Inadvertent Flyers / How? Rick Umali Piloting 29 February 15th 06 04:40 AM
Neil Lawson and Accident Investigation David Roberts Soaring 8 August 15th 05 03:47 PM
FAA grants AOPA demand for investigation into Meigs closure Larry Dighera Piloting 18 February 16th 04 11:33 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:05 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.