A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Glider population Statistic



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 9th 16, 03:42 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
smfidler
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 72
Default Glider population Statistic

Number of current glider pilots in the USA?

Number of current glider pilots in Canada?

Number of current glider pilots in the world?

Thanks,

Sean
  #2  
Old February 9th 16, 04:57 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
son_of_flubber
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,550
Default Glider population Statistic

I wonder how many glider pilots passed a BFR in the last two years.


  #3  
Old February 9th 16, 05:25 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 478
Default Glider population Statistic

On Tuesday, February 9, 2016 at 11:57:39 AM UTC-5, son_of_flubber wrote:
I wonder how many glider pilots passed a BFR in the last two years.


8710s for flight reviews are coming. Someday we'll know. Maybe we don't want to...
  #4  
Old February 9th 16, 05:38 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
JS
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,384
Default Glider population Statistic

Not the dreaded 8710!
Other than between 8709 and 8711, what is an 8710?
Is it like a landing on tow?
Jim

On Tuesday, February 9, 2016 at 9:25:18 AM UTC-8, wrote:
8710s for flight reviews are coming. Someday we'll know. Maybe we don't want to...


  #5  
Old February 9th 16, 05:54 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Charlie M. (UH & 002 owner/pilot)
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,383
Default Glider population Statistic

On Tuesday, February 9, 2016 at 12:38:51 PM UTC-5, JS wrote:
Not the dreaded 8710!
Other than between 8709 and 8711, what is an 8710?
Is it like a landing on tow?
Jim

On Tuesday, February 9, 2016 at 9:25:18 AM UTC-8, wrote:
8710s for flight reviews are coming. Someday we'll know. Maybe we don't want to...


Google search for "FAA 8710" yields... http://www.faa.gov/documentlibrary/m...faa_8710-1.pdf
  #6  
Old February 9th 16, 05:58 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 478
Default Glider population Statistic

On Tuesday, February 9, 2016 at 12:38:51 PM UTC-5, JS wrote:
Not the dreaded 8710!
Other than between 8709 and 8711, what is an 8710?
Is it like a landing on tow?
Jim

On Tuesday, February 9, 2016 at 9:25:18 AM UTC-8, wrote:
8710s for flight reviews are coming. Someday we'll know. Maybe we don't want to...


Same form you filled out for your checkride. New Advisory Circular for flight reviews says 8710s 'should' be filled out for flight reviews. 'Should' often becomes 'Shall' with these things. New AC http://www.faa.gov/documentlibrary/m.../ac_61-98c.pdf
One more hassle, but it would answer the active pilot population question for glider and sport pilots.
  #7  
Old February 9th 16, 08:13 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
son_of_flubber
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,550
Default Glider population Statistic

On Tuesday, February 9, 2016 at 12:59:02 PM UTC-5, wrote:
but it would answer the active pilot population question for glider and sport pilots.


Perhaps when 'current medical' goes away for GA power pilots, 'should' will be changed to 'shall'.

New Advisory Circular for flight reviews says 8710s 'should' be filled out for flight reviews.

  #8  
Old February 9th 16, 10:53 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
waremark
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 377
Default Glider population Statistic

Much mention of bfr's. We don't have such things in the UK, although some clubs impose their own requirements. I wonder whether that's a good thing or a bad thing.
  #9  
Old February 10th 16, 12:00 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
son_of_flubber
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,550
Default Glider population Statistic

On Tuesday, February 9, 2016 at 5:53:51 PM UTC-5, waremark wrote:
Much mention of bfr's. We don't have such things in the UK, although some clubs impose their own requirements. I wonder whether that's a good thing or a bad thing.


I do a BFR every 12 months because I'm not as young as I used to be.
  #10  
Old February 10th 16, 01:35 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,124
Default Glider population Statistic

On Tuesday, February 9, 2016 at 7:00:54 PM UTC-5, son_of_flubber wrote:
On Tuesday, February 9, 2016 at 5:53:51 PM UTC-5, waremark wrote:
Much mention of bfr's. We don't have such things in the UK, although some clubs impose their own requirements. I wonder whether that's a good thing or a bad thing.


I do a BFR every 12 months because I'm not as young as I used to be.


There is no such thing as a BFR and has not been for many years. It is simply called a flight review. Doing it once a year is a good practice, at the very least the flying portion.
All our club members are required to do a spring check before solo flying which is a pretty good practice, we think.

UH
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
NY Times Story on Pilot Population Decline Marco Leon Piloting 341 June 8th 07 06:33 PM
Glider Model - Blaue Maus- 1922 Wasserkuppe Glider [email protected] Soaring 5 November 19th 06 11:08 PM
A disturbing statistic Dane Spearing Instrument Flight Rules 63 November 6th 06 02:06 AM
request for fighter pilot statistic gatt Piloting 64 December 21st 05 10:55 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:51 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.