A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Will US Sport Pilot be insurable?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1  
Old November 26th 03, 08:12 PM
Mark James Boyd
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Will US Sport Pilot be insurable?

The US Sport Pilot initiative seems like it will be
fully approved in less than another year.
I wonder if Sport Pilots will be insurable in the US?
By happy coincidence, Jane and Dennis both seem
to be strong supporters, so I hope they
can help with the final problem (which has also
thwarted ultralights) of insurance.

Jane Garvey (head of US air regulations) supports the
Sport Pilot initiative, which would allow much looser
requirements for pilots and instructors transitioning from
power to simple gliders (such as the 2-33 or 1-26).

Dennis Wright (the US soaring association guy) agrees
US soaring is over-regulated and overly complex. See his
Dec 2003 Soaring editorial. "Remember 'safety' and
'fun' are not mutually exclusive". He strongly supports
sport pilot.

But in the US, the insurer has the veto power. Will
Sport Pilot, Jane, and Dennis be able to convince
insurers to cover this kind of flying?

There are more than 22 glider operations in California
(including Reno and half of them have 2-33s and/or 1-26s.
These operations have the potential to market to
over 600,000 current pilots with a new product:
a sport pilot glider license.

With no cumbersome and expensive FAA practical test,
the sport pilot transition requires a mere glider
instructor sign-off. Then the new sport pilot
can take a passenger (spouse, kids, parents, friends)
on lovely and quiet sunset flights in the 2-33...

And there is a large pool of instructors who can
also become sport glider instructors with no FAA
practical test, just requiring two sign-offs.
Potentially they can instruct at these clubs too.

Well...if the insurer agrees. Hopefully the
fact there hasn't been a US 2-33 fatality in 25 years
will help show the simplicity and built in safety of
that aircraft at least.

How have those in other countries fared? Do
you have lower level licenses for less performing
aircraft? Do you have issues finding insurance?
Have your licensing requirements "evolved" over time?
For example, in the US power pilots used to not
need IFR, night, or radio training. Our sport pilot
initiative is an attempt to get back to the simpler
standard by allowing only simple aircraft. Have
you had similar initiatives to reduce these slowly
rising barriers to pilot entry?
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Aerobatics 28 January 2nd 09 02:26 PM
Sport Pilot cuts off special issuance at the knees Juan~--~Jimenez Home Built 40 August 10th 04 01:19 PM
sport pilot humor Occom Home Built 0 April 9th 04 04:22 PM
"I Want To FLY!"-(Youth) My store to raise funds for flying lessons Curtl33 General Aviation 7 January 9th 04 11:35 PM
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools RT Military Aviation 104 September 25th 03 03:17 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:14 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.