If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Will US Sport Pilot be insurable?
The US Sport Pilot initiative seems like it will be
fully approved in less than another year. I wonder if Sport Pilots will be insurable in the US? By happy coincidence, Jane and Dennis both seem to be strong supporters, so I hope they can help with the final problem (which has also thwarted ultralights) of insurance. Jane Garvey (head of US air regulations) supports the Sport Pilot initiative, which would allow much looser requirements for pilots and instructors transitioning from power to simple gliders (such as the 2-33 or 1-26). Dennis Wright (the US soaring association guy) agrees US soaring is over-regulated and overly complex. See his Dec 2003 Soaring editorial. "Remember 'safety' and 'fun' are not mutually exclusive". He strongly supports sport pilot. But in the US, the insurer has the veto power. Will Sport Pilot, Jane, and Dennis be able to convince insurers to cover this kind of flying? There are more than 22 glider operations in California (including Reno and half of them have 2-33s and/or 1-26s. These operations have the potential to market to over 600,000 current pilots with a new product: a sport pilot glider license. With no cumbersome and expensive FAA practical test, the sport pilot transition requires a mere glider instructor sign-off. Then the new sport pilot can take a passenger (spouse, kids, parents, friends) on lovely and quiet sunset flights in the 2-33... And there is a large pool of instructors who can also become sport glider instructors with no FAA practical test, just requiring two sign-offs. Potentially they can instruct at these clubs too. Well...if the insurer agrees. Hopefully the fact there hasn't been a US 2-33 fatality in 25 years will help show the simplicity and built in safety of that aircraft at least. How have those in other countries fared? Do you have lower level licenses for less performing aircraft? Do you have issues finding insurance? Have your licensing requirements "evolved" over time? For example, in the US power pilots used to not need IFR, night, or radio training. Our sport pilot initiative is an attempt to get back to the simpler standard by allowing only simple aircraft. Have you had similar initiatives to reduce these slowly rising barriers to pilot entry? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Sport Pilot cuts off special issuance at the knees | Juan~--~Jimenez | Home Built | 40 | August 10th 04 01:19 PM |
sport pilot humor | Occom | Home Built | 0 | April 9th 04 04:22 PM |
"I Want To FLY!"-(Youth) My store to raise funds for flying lessons | Curtl33 | General Aviation | 7 | January 9th 04 11:35 PM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |