If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
"Robert Ehrlich" wrote in message ... Udo Rumpf wrote: Hi, Thank you all, I have learned a lot. I have also come up with two more things to consider, both rather minor I suspect: - The control linkages are propably more complicated in a T-Tail (con). - With a T-Tail you can build the elevator in one piece so you can rig and derig more easily (pro). Now why are we not seeing more V-Tails? The main pro for T-Tails seem to be: - Good ground clearance - Less drag - Operates in clean undisturbed air How does a V-Tail stand up against that? Ground clearance is not an issue (I speak from experience) It is questionable as to it having less drag. The theory says yes. In practise it is not as easy to design a V tail that can match the T tail. The lower part of the vertical stab on a T tail is in disturb air as well. In case of the V tail you would have two surfaces in the disturb air. The mixer is a simple and light weight mechanical device. If built and installed right cross interference is minimal. Udo The V-tail is inherently less efficient than tails with separate horizontal and vertical surfaces (conventional and T tails) as a pitch stabilizer. For any speed except maybe just one, the horizontal stabiliser has to provide some vertical force in order that the glider remain trimmed. But in order to obtain the same vertical force from a V-tail, the normal forces on both surfaces need to be higher than the half of the total vertical force, because only their vertical component is useful, there are also horizontal components which cancel each other. But this increased normal force is lift and so produces an increased induced drag. Not very important if the V is very flat, but then the efficiency in yaw control, i.e. as a rudder and fin, is poor and a similar argument may be developed: now we are interested in the horizontal component and the vertical (higher) components are a nuisance increasing induced drag. However no such component exists in steady straight flight, so the inconvenience is less important. It may happen that in a very well suited situation of steady turn the above argument may be reversed in favor of V-tails: other tails need down elevator forces and outside turn rudder force, the resulting force being closer to the horizontal direction than both the preceding one could be provided with less induced drag by just one of the ruddervators if properly oriented. But I think that in performance oriented designs the priority is to minimize the drag in straight flight, and anyway this would be in favor of V-tail just for (some range around) some very well suited bank angle and speed. Robert You are right on all counts. I think it is still worse due to the fact the elevator and rudder action has to be combined. The elevator/rudder chord for the HP V Tail, for example, is 55% chord at the tip and 45% at the root. The size is dictated due to the combined controls when max deflexion is required for both controls, as deflection has to stay around 25 to 30 deg. To compare the elevator and ruder of a modern T tail which has only 25% chord and 30% respectively, which allows for a substantial laminar flow region on both fixed surfaces. There is also no question as to the superiority of the T tail regarding the interference drag. The T juncture on a T tail is more efficient then the V juncture, due to the T tail surfaces being aerodynamically off set, also the total wetted area is less. Regards Udo |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Tail Skid Help / Advice | Ray Lovinggood | Soaring | 3 | January 2nd 04 08:16 PM |
AH64 tail rotor | CivetOne | Rotorcraft | 3 | October 23rd 03 07:18 PM |
Oshkosh Get together Roster - Sign in, please! | Bruce E. Butts | Owning | 1 | July 26th 03 11:34 AM |
Oshkosh Get together Roster - Sign in, please! | Bruce E. Butts | Piloting | 1 | July 26th 03 11:34 AM |
The prone postion for tail gunners versus turrets. | The Enlightenment | Military Aviation | 8 | July 22nd 03 11:01 PM |