A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

AOPA Sweepstakes Rules- Canadians have to pass a test to win?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 27th 04, 04:35 PM
Brad Z
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default AOPA Sweepstakes Rules- Canadians have to pass a test to win?

I thought this was a joke when I first read this, from the AOPA win a twin
sweepstakes official rules:

"...In compliance with Canadian law, if winner is a Canadian resident, he or
she must first correctly answer a mathematical skill-testing question before
the prize will be awarded. If the potential winner is unable to correctly
answer the question, AOPA will select an alternate winner."


Can anyone shed some light as to the purpose of this Canadian law? Is this
to keep mathematically-challenged people from owning aircraft?


  #2  
Old January 27th 04, 04:52 PM
MH
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I can't say "officially" where this law came from but any/all "free" or
giveaway prizes in Canada have this silly attachment to them.

Almost always the question is mah related and looks like.

What is 33 x 3 /9 =

In this case, 11. also i've noticed o nthese that the BEDMAS principles
generally do not apply. I've seen questions with () in them but the answer
is only "correct" if you do the math in sequence and ignore the BEDMAS
rules.

I'm sure someone else can give you more details eh?

"Brad Z" wrote in message
news:wrwRb.125923$Rc4.979896@attbi_s54...
I thought this was a joke when I first read this, from the AOPA win a twin
sweepstakes official rules:

"...In compliance with Canadian law, if winner is a Canadian resident, he

or
she must first correctly answer a mathematical skill-testing question

before
the prize will be awarded. If the potential winner is unable to correctly
answer the question, AOPA will select an alternate winner."


Can anyone shed some light as to the purpose of this Canadian law? Is

this
to keep mathematically-challenged people from owning aircraft?




  #3  
Old January 27th 04, 05:07 PM
G.R. Patterson III
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Brad Z wrote:

Can anyone shed some light as to the purpose of this Canadian law? Is this
to keep mathematically-challenged people from owning aircraft?


Sounds like a poorly worded law against games of chance. That type of law is the
reason behind some of the things you have to do to enter sweepstakes like the
Publisher's Clearing House.

George Patterson
Great discoveries are not announced with "Eureka!". What's usually said is
"Hummmmm... That's interesting...."
  #4  
Old January 28th 04, 04:54 AM
Drew Hamilton
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article wrwRb.125923$Rc4.979896@attbi_s54, Brad Z wrote:
Can anyone shed some light as to the purpose of this Canadian law? Is this
to keep mathematically-challenged people from owning aircraft?


It's a lot easier to register your sweepstakes as a game of skill
than a game of chance. So they make it into a game of skill by
asking a mathematical question. I think that there has to be at
least 3 operations in the question for it to be skill-testing.

Someone else wrote something about Canadians all carrying around
calculators all the time (presumably on the off chance that we'll
win a sweepstakes?). I certainly don't know anyone who does..

- awh

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Aerobatics 28 January 2nd 09 02:26 PM
AOPA Sells-Out California Pilots in Military Airspace Grab? Larry Dighera Instrument Flight Rules 12 April 26th 04 06:12 PM
AOPA and ATC Privatization Chip Jones Instrument Flight Rules 139 November 12th 03 08:26 PM
AOPA and ATC Privatization Chip Jones Piloting 133 November 12th 03 08:26 PM
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Piloting 25 September 11th 03 01:27 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:32 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.