If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
"Platoon" instructing versus dedicated...
On Thu, 31 May 2012 16:45:28 -0700, John Halpenny wrote:
Many years ago I belonged to a sailing club with a very active training program. Training sessions involved crowds of students and instructors on the dock paired up randomly in a first come, first served format. The lessons were disorganized but the social life was great. They later went to a more organized plan with scheduled times and instructors, so there were far few people hanging about,... and the club collapsed. We're not collapsing, but I see something similar since my club switched to bookable training rather than the traditional flying list at the launch point. I learned with the list: worked for me, as I got solo in six months of weekend-only flying. I learnt on the winch in a system that guaranteed at least two launches each time you got to the top of the queue, and three if demand was lower. There was generally a reasonable number of people around the launch point, so ground handling muscle was usually not a problem and at busy times we had enough helpers to manage almost 20 launches an hour using a dual-drum winch. Now that almost all training is booked there simply aren't very many people at the launch point: last Saturday PM I was the only designated launch point marshal (there are normally two) and so was very busy and forced to rely on students and those waiting to fly to keep things moving because nobody else was there to help by retrieving landed gliders, fetching winch cables, etc, etc. I accept that booked training is probably better for students, but it wrecks the launch point social scene and makes life much harder for those running the flight line. -- martin@ | Martin Gregorie gregorie. | Essex, UK org | |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
"Platoon" instructing versus dedicated...
Let me try to put a different spin on this topic:
For those of you doing the "platoon" system, two big questions: 1) How do you get around the fact that when a student flies with an instructor they haven't seen in a couple of months the instructor invariably asks the student to repeat what they already know, to "get a feel" for the student? This tends to burn several hours of the student's time as they wait around for the launch line and the instructor to come available. This creates a great deal of frustration in our club among students who often only get 2 flights a day (one of which is purely review)... 2) Relying on students to be "self-motivated" or "design their own lesson plans" only works if the students know what the hell they're supposed to be doing next, or concentrating on. As mentioned by others in this thread, that works OK with transition students or add- on rations; but ab-initio students are frequently drifting without a compass. How does your club deal with that? In our club, we seem to be good at telling new members to go to the launch line on their first day and chat up an instructor. But after that it seems all they learn to do is buy a few books, carry them around, and take repeated flights with instructors (who's pre-flight briefings take all of 5 minutes and post-flight briefings consist of a chat while walking the glider back to the line). Do those of you with a platoon system find that you have decent ground instruction? Do your platoon instructors actually sit down with students and give them guidance? Do they make themselves available at any other time besides on the launch-line? What support-systems do you have in place? My experience is that "platoon" instructors aren't tied to any students, so its easy for them to not take any responsibility for their students' success or failure. How do you avoid that? [NOTE: For those who want to insist that its the student's job to take responsibility and that truly motivated students will succeed - I understand the sentiment but I also point to the high student dropout rate and declining pilot population as evidence that this is a ****- poor argument. Yes, we can see that motivated people are getting their license; but it doesn't mean that the system is functioning well. Most sports or skill-based activities have mentors and coaches for a good reason - even if someone is motivated they can still use guidance and encouragement. This can be seen in grassroots/amateur hobbies all the way up through the highest levels of professional athletes.] 3) For those who moved to scheduled training: Do you do anything social in your club to support the social-scene other than having a launch-line? Do you think events like BBQs or Seminars or Mentoring sessions would help? 4) For those who talk about scheduled training causing them to come out less-often: What about supplementing your in-air experiences with flight simulators or ground-instruction (in-person, on the phone, online, etc)? --Noel |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
"Platoon" instructing versus dedicated...
On May 31, 8:50*pm, "noel.wade" wrote:
Let me try to put a different spin on this topic: For those of you doing the "platoon" system, two big questions: 1) How do you get around the fact that when a student flies with an instructor they haven't seen in a couple of months the instructor invariably asks the student to repeat what they already know, to "get a feel" for the student? *This tends to burn several hours of the student's time as they wait around for the launch line and the instructor to come available. *This creates a great deal of frustration in our club among students who often only get 2 flights a day (one of which is purely review)... 2) Relying on students to be "self-motivated" or "design their own lesson plans" only works if the students know what the hell they're supposed to be doing next, or concentrating on. *As mentioned by others in this thread, that works OK with transition students or add- on rations; but ab-initio students are frequently drifting without a compass. *How does your club deal with that? *In our club, we seem to be good at telling new members to go to the launch line on their first day and chat up an instructor. *But after that it seems all they learn to do is buy a few books, carry them around, and take repeated flights with instructors (who's pre-flight briefings take all of 5 minutes and post-flight briefings consist of a chat while walking the glider back to the line). *Do those of you with a platoon system find that you have decent ground instruction? *Do your platoon instructors actually sit down with students and give them guidance? *Do they make themselves available at any other time besides on the launch-line? What support-systems do you have in place? *My experience is that "platoon" instructors aren't tied to any students, so its easy for them to not take any responsibility for their students' success or failure. *How do you avoid that? [NOTE: For those who want to insist that its the student's job to take responsibility and that truly motivated students will succeed - I understand the sentiment but I also point to the high student dropout rate and declining pilot population as evidence that this is a ****- poor argument. *Yes, we can see that motivated people are getting their license; but it doesn't mean that the system is functioning well. *Most sports or skill-based activities have mentors and coaches for a good reason - even if someone is motivated they can still use guidance and encouragement. *This can be seen in grassroots/amateur hobbies all the way up through the highest levels of professional athletes.] 3) For those who moved to scheduled training: *Do you do anything social in your club to support the social-scene other than having a launch-line? *Do you think events like BBQs or Seminars or Mentoring sessions would help? 4) For those who talk about scheduled training causing them to come out less-often: *What about supplementing your in-air experiences with flight simulators or ground-instruction (in-person, on the phone, online, etc)? --Noel The crucial element to make the platoon system work is a published syllabus. Our students get a booklet that lays out all the instruction through bronze badge with a prominent space on the front for them to write their names. The students always show up with this because this is where the lesson plans are detailed, along with the reading assignments and instructor signoffs. Each lesson plan includes items to be covered as ground instruction, in the simulator, and in the air. An estimate of how many sessions should be required is also listed. My students always show up with one, unless they're on their first visit to the airport, in which case we make sure they get one. Lately we've gone to a more formally scheduled list. For several years we'd just left it up to the instructor, and my preference was to have a "morning ground" and an "afternoon group", who all stuck around and helped each other. (I don't require my students to hang around all day but I like to see a half day helping each other out from everybody.) I haven't seen the new schedule in action much yet, but it seems to be OK with the students more or less operating in a first half/second half grouping. In the past we set up an online scheduling system. We had one student in particular abuse this very badly: he would schedule himself every Saturday at 2 for a month in advance. He'd show up at 1:59 and expect to be launched promptly, and then disappear once he'd flown. We were glad to be shot of him. At least our current system is under control of the instructor, so I have control of when I want my students to fly. If they need to do some soaring I can move them to mid afternoon, or schedule them early or late in the day if they're getting close to solo and would benefit from calmer conditions. -- Matt |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
"Platoon" instructing versus dedicated...
On Thu, 31 May 2012 21:10:41 -0500, Matt McKrell
wrote: Noel, Good questions. I want to draw one distinction between how our club handles instruction and what some others have described. While we do have a "platoon" system, this applies to the CFIs, not to the students. Students still schedule their flights (4 instructional slots per day). Perhaps this wasn't clear in my earlier e-mail. So, instructors volunteer and come out per an online schedule, and students sign up (up to a week before) to fly anytime they are able. The distinction I draw is with a system where students just show up with no idea who might be the duty instructor and no certainty of flying. This is not the way we do it. Students and instructors are scheduled ahead of time, but students are not "paired" with a particular instructor. One side-effect of this system, though, is that students can to a certain extent "pair up" with an instructor by scheduling themselves only on days when that instructor is signed up to instruct. Of course, this typically means only one instructional session per month, which is far less than optimal. Perhaps another way to look at it is that if students have a particular instruction who does NOT mesh well with their learning style, they at least have a means to avoid flying with this instructor. Note that I am not aware of much of this actually happening, but perhaps it does. Regarding your specific questions, Noel: 1) Basically, most of glider instruction is review and practice. It is not as complex as airplane training in terms of varied different areas of performance. I can easily run a student through every task on the PTS on their first flight. Of course I don't do this, but the point is that there aren't that many things that need to be done on the practical and these things tend to be introduced within the first 10 flights or so. Then, the rest is just practice and refinement, and learning to do the same maneuver under different conditions. For example, while a student may be totally proficient in boxing the wake in calm, morning conditions, take that same student up on a buoyant afternoon and the result may be a less than proficient performance. It takes practice, repetition, and experience under different weather conditions to make a well-trained glider pilot. This should not be annoying to students. Think about this in more general terms. All of glider flying essentially comes down to knowing how to find an exploit lift, navigate in a straight line, takeoff and land. If you can do these 4 things perfectly under any conditions, you are now the world champion. Of course, nobody does these things perfectly, which is why people spend a good chunk of their years on earth trying to get closer to perfection. Going up and practicing boxing the wake for the 14th time shouldn't be seen by students as "wasting time." It's a task that should be practiced over and over again until it can be performed well under any conditions. Then, it should be periodically practiced (even after license) to ensure continued proficiency. If students are bored by repetition and don't see that the point is to push them along closer to perfection, then probably they need the CFI to be more active in pointing out areas for improvement. Maybe they think they are already totally proficient and no room is left for improvement? 2) Relying on students to be "self motivated" doesn't work for ab initio students. I think this is somewhat true. As others have mentioned, we have a pretty comprehensive syllabus and training outline that shows students exactly what they SHOULD be studying and practicing. I think this provides the "road map" that ab initio students need in order to keep themselves on track. However, we are all adults, so we do rely to a certain extent on students to speak up if they think they have missed something or need more practice or instruction in certain areas. I think this is true even if instructors are paired up with students from start to finish. Also, as I mentioned previously, as the date for the checkride draws near, students tend to pair up more closely with a particular CFI. In any case, ONE CFI will be on the hook for signing the student's 8710 form (the form that attests that the CFI has prepared the student for the practical test), so in the end a single CFI has to ensure that all the training has been accomplished (even if not all of it was preformed by him personally). So, for the last month or so, our chief CFI will typically assist the student in arranging the final few instructional sessions with a particular CFI who will do a comprehensive review and analysis of the student's performance, fill in any gaps, and recommend the student to the examiner by signing his 8710 form. The other topic that has been brought up relative to scheduled training is a resulting lack of manpower at the launch line. Personally, I think this smacks of making students "pay their dues" by hanging out and performing free labor in order to fly. If this is required by everyone in the club, great, but I have seen many cases where students are expected to show up at 9 AM (or whenever) in order to (hopefully) get on the schedule with an instructor. This instructional slot may not happen until 4 PM, and in the meantime the students (and not other members) are expected to provide all the labor to launch everyone. Meanwhile, the glass ship owners show up at the field at 11:30 AM, recruit a students to help them assemble, then expect the students to help with ground handling and launching. The glass ship guys launch at 12:30, returning at 5 PM, and expect the students to help disassemble and put their gliders back in the box. This certainly would create hard feelings among the students. It's just not fair. Our club has assigned "ground crew" slots each flying day. Every member (unless they are an instructor or tow pilot) is expected to sign up for one of these ground crew slots each month. This means that we have 40-year veteran X/C pilots out shagging ropes once a month, just like everyone else. Students don't see themselves as "second class citizens" and they get the benefit of sharing the experience often with much more experienced pilots and club members. This also avoids the "blind leading the blind" effect that sometimes occurs at clubs where the ground crew is solely composed of less experienced (student) members. And, it provides a great opportunity for interaction between younger members and those with more experience. --Stefan On May 31, 8:50 pm, "noel.wade" wrote: Let me try to put a different spin on this topic: For those of you doing the "platoon" system, two big questions: 1) How do you get around the fact that when a student flies with an instructor they haven't seen in a couple of months the instructor invariably asks the student to repeat what they already know, to "get a feel" for the student? This tends to burn several hours of the student's time as they wait around for the launch line and the instructor to come available. This creates a great deal of frustration in our club among students who often only get 2 flights a day (one of which is purely review)... 2) Relying on students to be "self-motivated" or "design their own lesson plans" only works if the students know what the hell they're supposed to be doing next, or concentrating on. As mentioned by others in this thread, that works OK with transition students or add- on rations; but ab-initio students are frequently drifting without a compass. How does your club deal with that? In our club, we seem to be good at telling new members to go to the launch line on their first day and chat up an instructor. But after that it seems all they learn to do is buy a few books, carry them around, and take repeated flights with instructors (who's pre-flight briefings take all of 5 minutes and post-flight briefings consist of a chat while walking the glider back to the line). Do those of you with a platoon system find that you have decent ground instruction? Do your platoon instructors actually sit down with students and give them guidance? Do they make themselves available at any other time besides on the launch-line? What support-systems do you have in place? My experience is that "platoon" instructors aren't tied to any students, so its easy for them to not take any responsibility for their students' success or failure. How do you avoid that? [NOTE: For those who want to insist that its the student's job to take responsibility and that truly motivated students will succeed - I understand the sentiment but I also point to the high student dropout rate and declining pilot population as evidence that this is a ****- poor argument. Yes, we can see that motivated people are getting their license; but it doesn't mean that the system is functioning well. Most sports or skill-based activities have mentors and coaches for a good reason - even if someone is motivated they can still use guidance and encouragement. This can be seen in grassroots/amateur hobbies all the way up through the highest levels of professional athletes.] 3) For those who moved to scheduled training: Do you do anything social in your club to support the social-scene other than having a launch-line? Do you think events like BBQs or Seminars or Mentoring sessions would help? 4) For those who talk about scheduled training causing them to come out less-often: What about supplementing your in-air experiences with flight simulators or ground-instruction (in-person, on the phone, online, etc)? --Noel The crucial element to make the platoon system work is a published syllabus. Our students get a booklet that lays out all the instruction through bronze badge with a prominent space on the front for them to write their names. The students always show up with this because this is where the lesson plans are detailed, along with the reading assignments and instructor signoffs. Each lesson plan includes items to be covered as ground instruction, in the simulator, and in the air. An estimate of how many sessions should be required is also listed. My students always show up with one, unless they're on their first visit to the airport, in which case we make sure they get one. Lately we've gone to a more formally scheduled list. For several years we'd just left it up to the instructor, and my preference was to have a "morning ground" and an "afternoon group", who all stuck around and helped each other. (I don't require my students to hang around all day but I like to see a half day helping each other out from everybody.) I haven't seen the new schedule in action much yet, but it seems to be OK with the students more or less operating in a first half/second half grouping. In the past we set up an online scheduling system. We had one student in particular abuse this very badly: he would schedule himself every Saturday at 2 for a month in advance. He'd show up at 1:59 and expect to be launched promptly, and then disappear once he'd flown. We were glad to be shot of him. At least our current system is under control of the instructor, so I have control of when I want my students to fly. If they need to do some soaring I can move them to mid afternoon, or schedule them early or late in the day if they're getting close to solo and would benefit from calmer conditions. -- Matt -- Stefan Murry |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
In an ideal world the student would be switched on and proactive in their training but glider clubs can be difficult to 'crack' as in feeling a real part of the scene and a feeling of belonging. In my experience that makes a real difference in the level of keenness from the student and along with social activities at the club can help bind them to the sport
At my club the instructors are rostered on and the students mostly fly with who ever is on duty. They are free to fly with any instructor by arrangement and some choose to do this. Here in New Zealand we have a structured syllabus that leads through to being a qualified glider pilot which goes some way to keeping good continuity between the different instructors. http://www.gliding.co.nz/training/syllabus One of the bigger problems I have seen in the last 8 years since my return to the sport is 'old worn out' instructors staying in the game for the free flying with students and trial flights. They only flew when someone else was paying and showed little interest in progressing the students through the syllabus. Fortunately for all concerned this has largely disappeared in the last couple of years. I would also like to be very clear that some of our 'old timers' are/were excellent instructors and with their years of experience are of great value to the club Colin http://www.glidingauckland.co.nz |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
"Platoon" instructing versus dedicated...
On Thu, 31 May 2012 17:50:39 -0700, noel.wade wrote:
Let me try to put a different spin on this topic: For those of you doing the "platoon" system, two big questions: 1) How do you get around the fact that when a student flies with an instructor they haven't seen in a couple of months the instructor As I already said, I think this is helped a lot in my club by the fact that all UK instructors teach the same syllabus and will write notes in the student's log book about what was taught and, less commonly, about things that he things need more work. 2) Relying on students to be "self-motivated" or "design their own lesson plans" only works if the students know what the hell they're supposed to be doing next, or concentrating on. This simply doesn't happen for the reasons given above. As my club teaches on the winch, and its quite usual to be solo well before getting an aero tow sign-off (I got mine a year after going solo). A result is that a student will do 2-3 launches on the trot and there will normally be an extensive debrief at the end of that set. 3) For those who moved to scheduled training: Do you do anything social in your club to support the social-scene other than having a launch-line? Do you think events like BBQs or Seminars or Mentoring sessions would help? Some things get rolled into the booking. A pre-solo booking is always for a half day and assigns two students to an instructor and glider. We never roster for less than two instructors + gliders plus a launch marshal, assistant launch marshal, winch driver and tuggie. Trial flights don't normally interfe they use a third glider and instructor, who may be available for training if only a few trial flights have been booked. If you take a morning booking you're expected to be there for the hangar unpack, DI, and setting up the airfield. Similarly, afternoon bookings expect the student to help with clearing the field, washing the gliders and hangar packing. The upshot of all this is that there should be enough people to help with driving the cable truck, moving gliders and there's a bit of time for the group of students socialise among themselves and with other club members who are on duty or just hanging out. We also run flying evenings twice a week during the season - all off the winch for noise reasons - which are part training and part social, especially as there is usually food involved and these sessions often end with a pint in a local pub. 4) For those who talk about scheduled training causing them to come out less-often: What about supplementing your in-air experiences with flight simulators or ground-instruction (in-person, on the phone, online, etc)? Some members use Condor over winter, but the club doesn't have a simulator despite it getting discussed from time to time. -- martin@ | Martin Gregorie gregorie. | Essex, UK org | |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Standardising Pilot Licensing/Instructing and Safety issues | johnhamish | Soaring | 5 | December 6th 09 09:35 AM |
Being Awake And Staying Awake - versus - Being Told "You Need Sleep!" {HRI note 20060907} | Koos Nolst Trenite | Piloting | 27 | September 10th 06 06:40 PM |
A Wiki dedicated to Aviation | [email protected] | General Aviation | 4 | March 10th 05 06:52 PM |
"zero" versus "oscar" versus "sierra" | Ron Garret | Piloting | 30 | December 20th 04 08:49 AM |
Instructing with an ATP | \T\ Tung | Piloting | 9 | December 15th 03 06:45 AM |