If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
"R. Hubbell" wrote in message news:20040305200906.1d872e49@fstop... On Fri, 5 Mar 2004 11:03:51 -0800 "C J Campbell" wrote: "R. Hubbell" wrote in message news:20040305082731.0e32b58f@fstop... Any prognosticators out there that know what's next from Garmin in the handheld category? I like the size of the Airmap 1000 but I also like the company, Garmin, a little better. Does it really matter? Panel GPS units are becoming extremely common. The handheld is being relegated to backup status, like a handheld radio. Handhelds are great, especially if you don't own your own plane. My guess is that eventually we will see an all-in-one GPS/Nav/Com with personal ELT, about the size of a cellular phone, with an interface like the 196. Perhaps it will be a cellular phone, too, and even a PDA. Since it really is intended for emergency use, the com radio only needs a couple of frequencies such as emergency and weather channels. They have GPS/ELT/EPIRB/PLB units now that use 406MHz. Maybe they could add a cell-phone to dial 911. In the meantime, I expect to see the 296 introduced sometime this year. I haven't seen any mention of it. Is it a color 196? -------------------------------------------------- The old color GPS is the 295. Just as the 196 replaced the 195 it is assumed that there is a '296' that will eventually replace the 295. Garmin is very secretive. They will sell 295's and deny that there is a replacement in the works right up to the day they announce the replacement and put it on sale at some major air show. Even their factory reps will not know anything about it until then -- they will even be encouraged to tell people that Garmin has decided that color GPS is a bad idea (which they do). That is what Garmin has always done in the past, so there is little reason to expect that they will do anything different this time. They have done this so often that no one believes them any more. What the actual designation of that replacement will be is unknown. So most people call the replacement the 296 out of convenience. It may not be a color 196 any more than the 295 was a color 195. Garmin is probably being truthful (from a certain point of view) when they say that there is no color version of the 196 in the works. No, the 296 (or whatever they choose to call it) could well be something that is completely different, with a different screen size, button layout, and overall shape. I know one guy who claims to have seen a '296.' He said it looked like a small tablet PC with a touch screen. Of course, he could be lying through his teeth. Garmin's marketing strategy is interesting. It is based around the idea that announcing new products before they are introduced will hurt sales of current products. It is the exact opposite of most technology manufacturers' strategy, which holds the theory that you announce new products as early as possible to prevent your customers from buying your competitors' products, giving rise to the term 'vaporware.' Garmin does not usually do 'vaporware,' although WAAS for the GNS panel mount units is a notable exception. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
I have almost lost all hope about Garmin's aviation "handhelds" - I love
their products but the Lowrance 500 is calling my name. (I owned a GPS III Plus and a 195, for a while.) Garmin is seeming to take a geologic age to update the GPS III Pilot into something more desireable.... Here is what I want Garmin to do: Make a unit that has the same (or thinner) form factor as the GPS III Pilot, but with a COLOR, higher resolution, backlit color display. Maintain or improve the battery life. Provide a large amount of RAM in which I can load RELATIVELY INEXPENSIVE ($50 for my area - e.g. California) terrestrial (highway/road/street) data. ("Go to/Turn Here" instructions would be nice but this is IMO a luxury.) Provide a rechargeable battery (preferably NiMh), an NMEA-capable USB data cable, and perhaps a yoke mounting device of some kind, as Lowrance did with my Airmap 100. Include the 195's pseudo-IFR approach capability. Keep it under $600. I'd also like to download TFR info from Jepp Flitestar, but I know that's a stretch... Garmin: make it, and I will buy it. Dave Blevins On Fri, 5 Mar 2004 08:27:31 -0800, R. Hubbell wrote: Any prognosticators out there that know what's next from Garmin in the handheld category? I like the size of the Airmap 1000 but I also like the company, Garmin, a little better. R. Hubbell |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Obstruction database (radio towers etc), and recharges when plugged
into aircraft power PLEASE. I have a 195. Nice unit, but getting a little old. But I wont upgrade until I get the above two. GRMN stock has taken a dip (it was up to $59), it is now around $46. Great company, great future. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
No prognostication, but what I want is terrain and obstacle data. I
won't buy another Garmin handheld until they include that. The day the do is probably the day I sell my 295 on eBay for $500 and get the new one--with elevation data. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Handhelds and alkaline batteries | Ross Richardson | Piloting | 44 | August 10th 03 12:17 AM |