A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Owning
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

PA28-181 Fuel pressure drop off - Inspired by the Gascolotor thread.



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 27th 05, 02:27 PM
Roy Page
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default PA28-181 Fuel pressure drop off - Inspired by the Gascolotor thread.

I bought our Piper Archer [PA28-181] just over a year ago from a Californian
owner and flew it home to it's new base in Ohio.
On the flight home, we noticed on long climbs that the fuel pressure fell
off from an indicated mid scale reading to about one third scale.
In level cruise the indicated pressure returned to mid scale.
Although we took the top cowl off at every stop to check carefully that we
still had all the important bits still hanging on, we failed to notice that
the gascolator had a slight fuel leak until a few days after we got the bird
home.
You need to remove the lower cowl to get access to the gascolator.
Our A&P put a new bowl seal on the gascolator which cured the leak and
appeared to cure the fuel pressure changes.
A few months passed and then occasionally I noticed a slight fall off in
fuel pressure when climbing.
I concluded that the mechanical engine driven fuel pump must be getting
tired and, to be safe, replaced it with a new pump three weeks ago.
No change, the fuel pressure still falls off when climbing and returns to
mid scale in level cruise.

I also belong to the Taylorcraft Flying Club www.taylorcraftflyingclub.org.
The club, these days, flies a fleet of three PA28's.
Our PA28-180 has a similar fall off in fuel pressure when climbing.

Ideas please ?

Roy
N5804F








  #2  
Old September 27th 05, 02:37 PM
Dave Butler
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Roy Page wrote:

On the flight home, we noticed on long climbs that the fuel pressure fell
off from an indicated mid scale reading to about one third scale.


snip

A few months passed and then occasionally I noticed a slight fall off in
fuel pressure when climbing.
I concluded that the mechanical engine driven fuel pump must be getting
tired and, to be safe, replaced it with a new pump three weeks ago.
No change, the fuel pressure still falls off when climbing and returns to
mid scale in level cruise.


snip

Our PA28-180 has a similar fall off in fuel pressure when climbing.


I don't know what causes it, but the PA28-180 I previously owned did this, too.
First time I saw it, I made a precautionary landing, no trouble found. Like you,
I went over everything and never found any fault. Eventually I concluded it was
just a peculiarity of the model and was benign. If you find a way to fix it, let
us all know.

Dave
  #3  
Old September 27th 05, 02:54 PM
Jonathan Goodish
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article et,
"Roy Page" wrote:
I concluded that the mechanical engine driven fuel pump must be getting
tired and, to be safe, replaced it with a new pump three weeks ago.
No change, the fuel pressure still falls off when climbing and returns to
mid scale in level cruise.


Check the POH, I believe that Piper recommends that the fuel boost pump
remain "on" during climb.





JKG
  #4  
Old September 27th 05, 03:35 PM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

: Check the POH, I believe that Piper recommends that the fuel boost pump
: remain "on" during climb.

The stock Piper fuel pump is marginal, especially on 180hp engines. I talked
with Petersen at length about this when I bought his autofuel STC for our PA28/180.
Bottom line is to get the STC certified, they had to replace the electric fuel pump
due to "low fuel flow." My thought is the Piper system was marginal, but acceptable
in the early 1960's when the TC was issued. Now, it's not considered enough, so the
autofuel STC was required to "fix" it.

FWIW, my plane drops some fuel pressure when the electric boost is off as
well. In a full-power-on-stall, it reads about 0.5-1 psi without the electric on.
With, it comes right back where it belongs.

I believe it's not unsafe, although it *is* a bit unnerving.... just an
idiosyncracy of the plane.

-Cory


************************************************** ***********************
* Cory Papenfuss *
* Electrical Engineering candidate Ph.D. graduate student *
* Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University *
************************************************** ***********************

  #5  
Old September 27th 05, 05:03 PM
nrp
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Any chance you are looking at a partial vapor lock? Are the fuel lines
insulated? I heard from a couple of sources (though years ago) that
Piper Cherokees are more prone to these problems than most other
autofuel STC holders.

  #6  
Old September 27th 05, 06:15 PM
Roy Page
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Well you could be correct about a possible vapor lock.
As far as I can see the fuel lines are not insulated.
The autofuel STC on an Archer calls for mods to the fuel system to prevent
vapor locks.
But I do run on 100LL which is less volatile that Regular Gas.
But if the PA28 aircraft are prone to vapor locks, I would have expected to
see an AD a long time ago ?

Thanks for the input.

Roy

"nrp" wrote in message
oups.com...
Any chance you are looking at a partial vapor lock? Are the fuel lines
insulated? I heard from a couple of sources (though years ago) that
Piper Cherokees are more prone to these problems than most other
autofuel STC holders.



  #7  
Old September 27th 05, 06:49 PM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Roy Page wrote:
: Well you could be correct about a possible vapor lock.
: As far as I can see the fuel lines are not insulated.
: The autofuel STC on an Archer calls for mods to the fuel system to prevent
: vapor locks.
: But I do run on 100LL which is less volatile that Regular Gas.
: But if the PA28 aircraft are prone to vapor locks, I would have expected to
: see an AD a long time ago ?

: Thanks for the input.

My cherokee could be vapor lock, but I've seen it on three different cherokees
that I've flown, with autofuel or on 100LL.

The flow of the pump is just barely adequate. Petersen described the "ditch
test" where they had to put the tail of the plane down in a "ditch" to get a high
nose-up attitude. In the worst conditions, the stock fuel system was unable to
deliver the flow rate with an acceptable safety margin. Thus the modifications to the
fuel system for autofuel STC.

What *really* bugs me is that a PA28-160 has to do the fuel mod for the STC,
but if it's got low-compression pistons (i.e. PA28-140/150), the fuel mod isn't
required. You tell me how changing the pistons (i.e. low compression vs. high
compression) changes fuel flow. Safety through liability and regulation...

-Cory


************************************************** ***********************
* Cory Papenfuss *
* Electrical Engineering candidate Ph.D. graduate student *
* Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University *
************************************************** ***********************

  #8  
Old September 27th 05, 07:14 PM
Roy Page
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

It seems, from the initial comments that a fuel pressure fall off during
climb in PA28 aircraft is seen more often than I thought.
As a mechanical engineer, I can concur that the engine driven fuel pump is
only just keeping up with the full fuel flow needs of a 0-360.
Which is the reasoning behind why I decided to fit a new fuel pump.
My thinking was that the internal diaphragm was tired and could fail.
Sound reasoning, but on the assumption that the pump was more than man
enough to hold good fuel pressure. Not so maybe.

Well where do I go from here .....

Roy



wrote in message
...
Roy Page wrote:
: Well you could be correct about a possible vapor lock.
: As far as I can see the fuel lines are not insulated.
: The autofuel STC on an Archer calls for mods to the fuel system to
prevent
: vapor locks.
: But I do run on 100LL which is less volatile that Regular Gas.
: But if the PA28 aircraft are prone to vapor locks, I would have expected
to
: see an AD a long time ago ?

: Thanks for the input.

My cherokee could be vapor lock, but I've seen it on three different
cherokees
that I've flown, with autofuel or on 100LL.

The flow of the pump is just barely adequate. Petersen described the
"ditch
test" where they had to put the tail of the plane down in a "ditch" to get
a high
nose-up attitude. In the worst conditions, the stock fuel system was
unable to
deliver the flow rate with an acceptable safety margin. Thus the
modifications to the
fuel system for autofuel STC.

What *really* bugs me is that a PA28-160 has to do the fuel mod for the
STC,
but if it's got low-compression pistons (i.e. PA28-140/150), the fuel mod
isn't
required. You tell me how changing the pistons (i.e. low compression vs.
high
compression) changes fuel flow. Safety through liability and
regulation...

-Cory


************************************************** ***********************
* Cory Papenfuss *
* Electrical Engineering candidate Ph.D. graduate student *
* Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University *
************************************************** ***********************



  #9  
Old September 27th 05, 07:35 PM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

: Well where do I go from here .....

Piece of black tape to cover the fuel pressure gauge when you don't like what
it reads?

.... couldn't resist.

-Cory


--

************************************************** ***********************
* Cory Papenfuss *
* Electrical Engineering candidate Ph.D. graduate student *
* Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University *
************************************************** ***********************

  #10  
Old September 27th 05, 07:43 PM
Roy Page
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Well that is what I wrote Cory, but I deleted it before sending my post :-)

Roy

wrote in message
...
: Well where do I go from here .....

Piece of black tape to cover the fuel pressure gauge when you don't like
what
it reads?

... couldn't resist.

-Cory


--

************************************************** ***********************
* Cory Papenfuss *
* Electrical Engineering candidate Ph.D. graduate student *
* Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University *
************************************************** ***********************



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Mini-500 Accident Analysis Dennis Fetters Rotorcraft 16 September 3rd 05 11:35 AM
Towing Roger Fowler Soaring 6 August 11th 05 04:25 AM
Is Your Airplane Susceptible To Mis Fu eling? A Simple Test For Fuel Contamination. Nathan Young Piloting 4 June 14th 04 06:13 PM
faith in the fuel delivery infrastructure Chris Hoffmann Piloting 12 April 3rd 04 01:55 AM
Hot weather and autogas? Rich S. Home Built 33 July 30th 03 11:25 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:17 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.