If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Details on the New SPOT 2
One reason they don't have a charging port might be that it's really
hard to make that charging port waterproof. Can't see it adding more than a couple of bucks to the building cost. Ed |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Details on the New SPOT 2
On Aug 5, 1:35*pm, Ed Winchester wrote:
One reason they don't have a charging port might be that it's really hard to make that charging port waterproof. *Can't see it adding more than a couple of bucks to the building cost. Ed They don't have a charging port because they want to use long-shelf life primary (not rechargeable) battery. If they wanted a rechargeable battery there is no practical barrier (including weather proof specs) to them pretty easilly adding that. Darryl |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Details on the New SPOT 2
On Aug 6, 2:35*am, Steve Koerner wrote:
No help Philip. *The help button is reserved for special meaning. The Help and OK (and the new message button on the Spot2) are just buttons that send messages. The 'special' meaning is whatever you want it to be. So repurposing the Help in a one hour tracking function loses no specialness. Because Spot intended the OK button to mean OK and the Help button to mean Help doesn't actually restrict them to those uses. You can easily reverse those functions and use the Help to mean you're flying and provide tracking, and OK to mean you've landed out and want a retrieve. -- Philip Plane “When I use a word," Humpty Dumpty said in rather a scornful tone, "it means just what I choose it to mean - neither more nor less.” |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Details on the New SPOT 2
On Wed, 05 Aug 2009 13:22:04 -0700, Darryl Ramm wrote:
Their choice of a primary Li battery is completely understandable given their assumption the device is mostly for occasional use and an emergency signaling. I missed the point that Spot uses Li primary batteries rather than alkaline. Have you any idea of the capacity of AA and AAA Li cells? If I was SPOT I'd be looking to charge significantly more for external power + altitude and other features. Seems reasonable for altitude, but a bit outrageous for external power - after all that can be as simple as a rectangular recess moulded into the case with a couple of nickel-plated pins cast in. It would be very interesting to know the profile of the average Spot user, though. -- martin@ | Martin Gregorie gregorie. | Essex, UK org | |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Details on the New SPOT 2
On Aug 5, 2:04*pm, Philip wrote:
On Aug 6, 2:35*am, Steve Koerner wrote: No help Philip. *The help button is reserved for special meaning. The Help and OK (and the new message button on the Spot2) are just buttons that send messages. The 'special' meaning is whatever you want it to be. So repurposing the Help in a one hour tracking function loses no specialness. Because Spot intended the OK button to mean OK and the Help button to mean Help doesn't actually restrict them to those uses. You can easily reverse those functions and use the Help to mean you're flying and provide tracking, and OK to mean you've landed out and want a retrieve. -- Philip Plane “When I use a word," Humpty Dumpty said in rather a scornful tone, "it means just what I choose it to mean - neither more nor less.” Yes, I suppose I could install a coo-coo clock in the glider so that when the bird comes out, its beak will push the help button once every hour. And then I will hope that all who view my public spot page will not be confused by the concept that help means OK and OK means help. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Details on the New SPOT 2
On Aug 5, 2:31*pm, Martin Gregorie
wrote: On Wed, 05 Aug 2009 13:22:04 -0700, Darryl Ramm wrote: Their choice of a primary Li battery is completely understandable given their assumption the device is mostly for occasional use and an emergency signaling. I missed the point that Spot uses Li primary batteries rather than alkaline. Have you any idea of the capacity of AA and AAA Li cells? If I was SPOT I'd be looking to charge significantly more for external power + altitude and other features. Seems reasonable for altitude, but a bit outrageous for external power *- after all that can be as simple as a rectangular recess moulded into the case with a couple of nickel-plated pins cast in. It would be very interesting to know the profile of the average Spot user, though. -- martin@ * | Martin Gregorie gregorie. | Essex, UK org * * * | Martin Go to http://data.energizer.com and look at the "Lithium primary" specs. These are more like the batteries uses in ELT and PLB than normal rechargeable Li-ion or Li-Po batteries. Strong thanks to SPOT for going with the Energizer Li batteries and not a proprietary battery. I wonder if the PLB market could just about get away with using these instead of charging $100-$200 for a replacement battery pack with ~5 year lift. Anyhow you can see the significant battery capacity reduction in the new SPOT messenger. We'll have to see what the pracitcal track lifetime is with the new model. They have power saving features like an advanced new GPS chipset, but they are also sending more Globalstar data. New SPOT: 3 x AAA Energizer Li Ultimate ~ 3 x 1.2 Ah = 3.6 Ah Old SPOT: 2 x AA Li Energizer Ultimate ~ 2 x 3.0 = 6.0 Ah (at any low current draw) Of course if they were coming out with a product better for tracking applications, then reducing the track time on the low-end unit might make marketing sense :-) Darryl |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Details on the New SPOT 2
On Wed, 05 Aug 2009 14:56:21 -0700, Darryl Ramm wrote:
These are more like the batteries uses in ELT and PLB than normal rechargeable Li-ion or Li-Po batteries. Strong thanks to SPOT for going with the Energizer Li batteries and not a proprietary battery. I wonder if the PLB market could just about get away with using these instead of charging $100-$200 for a replacement battery pack with ~5 year lift. Very interesting. The capacity and discharge rate are very higher and the shelf life is noticeably better than alkaline. The shelf life is hugely better than LiPoly, which I guess is better for a lot of folks than remembering to charge it before use. I would guess that the high discharge rate would be rather useful for transmit power too. I just checked the price of a McMurdo battery pack: I take your point about using COTS batteries. McMurdo prices are fierce - when you can find an agent who sells replacement batteries. -- martin@ | Martin Gregorie gregorie. | Essex, UK org | |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Details on the New SPOT 2
On Aug 5, 2:56*pm, Darryl Ramm wrote:
New SPOT: 3 x AAA Energizer Li Ultimate ~ 3 x 1.2 Ah = 3.6 Ah Old SPOT: 2 x AA Li Energizer Ultimate ~ 2 x 3.0 = 6.0 Ah (at any low current draw) Are you saying the cells are in parallel in both units? If they are in series the capacity is the same for one cell as for 2 or 3 except that the 3 cell unit may run at higher current because of the increased voltage and have even lower battery life. Andy |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Details on the New SPOT 2
On Aug 5, 4:58*pm, Andy wrote:
On Aug 5, 2:56*pm, Darryl Ramm wrote: New SPOT: 3 x AAA Energizer Li Ultimate ~ 3 x 1.2 Ah = 3.6 Ah Old SPOT: 2 x AA Li Energizer Ultimate ~ 2 x 3.0 = 6.0 Ah (at any low current draw) Are you saying the cells are in parallel in both units? *If they are in series the capacity is the same for one cell as for 2 or 3 except that the 3 cell unit may run at higher current because of the increased voltage and have even lower battery life. Andy No I am summing battery capacity and ignoring voltage. If you want nominal Watt.h then multiply by 1.5 volts. To first order it does not matter how the batteries are configured. LDO regulators/charge pumps have relatively low loss and will be used internally to shift voltages,,and I assume they are not completely incompetent on basic power supply engineering. Darryl Darryl |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Details on the New SPOT 2
On Aug 5, 6:27*pm, Darryl Ramm wrote:
On Aug 5, 4:58*pm, Andy wrote: On Aug 5, 2:56*pm, Darryl Ramm wrote: New SPOT: 3 x AAA Energizer Li Ultimate ~ 3 x 1.2 Ah = 3.6 Ah Old SPOT: 2 x AA Li Energizer Ultimate ~ 2 x 3.0 = 6.0 Ah (at any low current draw) Are you saying the cells are in parallel in both units? *If they are in series the capacity is the same for one cell as for 2 or 3 except that the 3 cell unit may run at higher current because of the increased voltage and have even lower battery life. Andy No I am summing battery capacity and ignoring voltage. If you want nominal Watt.h then multiply by 1.5 volts. To first order it does not matter how the batteries are configured. *LDO regulators/charge pumps have relatively low loss and will be used internally to shift voltages,,and *I assume they are not completely incompetent on basic power supply engineering. Darryl Darryl If one cell has a capacity of 1 amp hour then 1000 of those cells in series still have a capacity of 1 amp hour. Do you disagree with that basic concept? Andy |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Spot deal, today only, buy service get a free Spot | Tim Taylor | Soaring | 3 | December 1st 08 10:30 PM |
Anyone got any details on this? | Jay Honeck | Piloting | 5 | December 19th 07 06:54 AM |
SS1 details | [email protected] | Soaring | 0 | January 13th 05 02:30 PM |
Any details about this? | Dan | Soaring | 5 | October 28th 03 07:22 PM |