If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
"A Guide to Transponders in Sailplanes" - updated!
I find it difficult to believe that adding a battery would cost $1,000. I
would think that this could be included as part of the installation of the transponder. Mike Schumann "Eric Greenwell" wrote in message ... On Feb 14, 8:59 pm, Mike the Strike wrote: On Feb 14, 9:42 pm, Mike the Strike wrote: Also.....consider, a Transponder equipped aircraft is also REQUIRED to have the transponder ON and reporting at all times from wheels up to wheels down......not just as I have heard many glider pilots saying they "only use" the transponder when they are flying at or near areas of high traffic.... think about this.... A lot of us have thought about this, including people in the FAA, and decided it's a lot better to have a transponder on in areas that need it, instead of risking a dead battery (meaning NO radio or transponder) later in the flight, or discouraging pilots with marginal batteries from installing a transponder. I covered this in the the "Guide". Take a look at that section and see if it promotes flight safety better than strict adherence to the "always on" rule; also, take a look at the "Why doesn't the SSA ..." section that addresses the FAA's official position. This argument seems rather like deciding to put your seat belt on in a car just before you have a crash! Anyway, this rule isn't an option, it is mandatory. If you have a transponder the regs say it MUST be on while you are flying. No pilot discretion here. And don't give me the battery argument. Electricity is the fuel for your instruments, including your safety ones such as the radio and transponder. In my book, starting a flight with insufficient battery power is as irresponsible as flying a power plane cross-country with insufficient fuel. It's the pilot's responsibility to make sure that he has everything needed for a safe flight and to comply with regulations and that includes power for the instruments. Mike I should add that the article is excellent - the battery issue and turning transponders off is the only point that I disagree with. With a $2,000+ transponder in a $50,000+ sailplane, it seems ironic that people are too mean to add another $10 battery. That's not what stops pilots - it's the $1000 battery that stops them. Many gliders require and additional battery when a transponder is installed, and doing this in certified glider can be expensive. Experimental certificate gliders can usually get by more cheaply. A dedicated 7 Ah battery will power a Microair transponder for 12 to 15 hours, in my experience. This is a no-brainer. That is the solution I recommend, but see the cost of implementing it stops some pilots from adding another battery. A 7 AH battery won't run a vario, radio, gps, AND a full-time transponder for very long. We have had a collision between an aircraft and a sailplane whose transponder was turned off "to save the batteries", so this isn't just a theoretical problem. And we are all agreed that if that was actually the case, it was a very foolish decision, because that is a prime area for using a transponder. But answer this: if that glider had not had a transponder, would the jet have hit it more gently? He was not required to have one, after all. -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
"A Guide to Transponders in Sailplanes" - updated!
Mike Schumann wrote:
I find it difficult to believe that adding a battery would cost $1,000. I would think that this could be included as part of the installation of the transponder. FWIW, we had a great deal of trouble with battery failures using a Terra TRT250D transponder (nearly twice the power consumption of a Becker, which wasn't then available in the US) in our Duo with the standard installation of two 7ah batteries. We would get about 3 to 4 hours out of each, failing to switch at the proper time would result in a useless battery after a few cycles. We wanted to switch to 12ah batteries, but there is essentially no room in a Duo for anything that size in an accessible spot, if we still wanted to continue to carry drinking water, survival kits, and/or jackets (this isn't the only glider with this problem). So, we had the local shop reshape the molded battery wells in the floor to accommodate the larger batteries. This involved cutting out the existing wells, molding new larger ones, glassing them back in, and painting. When all was said and done, it cost well over $1000, but it solved the problem... Marc |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
"A Guide to Transponders in Sailplanes" - updated!
Excellent update on your fine article, thanks Eric!
Have to disagree regarding your points on NiMH batteries, though. I've now flown now for over 2 years with them (including a dedicated transponder battery) and I love them. Weight is about 60% of sealed lead-acid, same for volume. The big advantage I see is in being able to quick-charge them with 2A in a couple of hours very safely with cheap automatic chargers available for example from all-battery.com or ebay. I fly with 2 batteries for instrumentation/radio, each 5AH and one for the transponder that has 10AH. One of the smaller batteries is in the tail. Having much less mass in the area behind the headrest is another plus. Shop around and find that the prices are affordable and pre-wired 12V packs are offered. I have not found the higher discharge rate in storage to be a factor. Herb, J7 |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
"A Guide to Transponders in Sailplanes" - updated!
Marc Ramsey wrote:
Mike Schumann wrote: I find it difficult to believe that adding a battery would cost $1,000. I would think that this could be included as part of the installation of the transponder. snip So, we had the local shop reshape the molded battery wells in the floor to accommodate the larger batteries. This involved cutting out the existing wells, molding new larger ones, glassing them back in, and painting. When all was said and done, it cost well over $1000, but it solved the problem... OK, now I know of two instances. -- Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA * Change "netto" to "net" to email me directly * Updated! "Transponders in Sailplanes" http://tinyurl.com/y739x4 * New Jan '08 - sections on Mode S, TPAS, ADS-B, Flarm, more * "A Guide to Self-launching Sailplane Operation" at www.motorglider.org |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
"A Guide to Transponders in Sailplanes" - updated!
On Feb 16, 9:42 pm, "Mike Schumann"
wrote: I find it difficult to believe that adding a battery would cost $1,000. I would think that this could be included as part of the installation of the transponder. I hope I didn't scare anyone off, as I've heard of only one instance and it was a certified glider. But, it is the kind of thing a few pilots worry about. Pilots with "newer" gliders will have factory locations for at least two batteries; "older" gliders generally weren't so well equipped, so there may be some effort and expense involved in adding another battery. I suspect a more common problem than insufficient space for adequate batteries is the battery getting low during the flight. This can happen because the flight is much longer than usual, the battery(s) weren't charged completely before takeoff, there was a battery or wiring failure, or other problem. This is the main situation I tried to address with the comments about using the transponder in the areas of greatest risk, and turning it off elsewhere. The point I was trying to make is that pilots that have just spent ~$2300 for a transponder, encoder, cabling, and antenna, plus looking at some more for the installation, aren't going to balk at buying a $10 (or even a $100 battery!) to power it. It's generally a much bigger amount for the complete installation (at typical technician hourly rates in the $50-$70 range) that makes the complete package to expensive for some pilots. My "Guide" offers some ideas for dealing with the power issue, besides the obvious one of adding another battery. -- Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA * Change "netto" to "net" to email me directly * Updated! "Transponders in Sailplanes" http://tinyurl.com/y739x4 * New Jan '08 - sections on Mode S, TPAS, ADS-B, Flarm, more * "A Guide to Self-launching Sailplane Operation" at www.motorglider.org |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
"A Guide to Transponders in Sailplanes" - updated!
Mike the Strike wrote:
On Feb 15, 10:18 am, "bumper" wrote: "Eric Greenwell" wrote in message ... And to reiterate, it's not a "200 watt transmitter". The peak power of the pulses is 200 watt, but it's only about a 5 watt max transmitter, as the pulses are short. I know you are talking about peak power vs average power. However, even though pulse width is narrow, and thus the average radiation from a 175 or 250 watt transponder might be on the order of 5 watts, I'm not sure the radiation exposure should be equated to just the low average power. Consider a single high powered pulse as being one .22 rifle bullet. The bullet might have on the order of 100 ft pounds of energy and would obviously do considerable tissue damage. Compare that to several hundred BB's from a low powered air rifle, the combined energy of which equals the energy of that one .22 bullet. Same total energy, far less damage. The point I'm trying to make is that pulsed high energy may well do more tissue damage than the same total amount of low level energy delivered over a longer time frame. I want that transponder antenna installed away from me. bumper A colleague who deals with radiation safety said that the argument that low energy long-duration doses of radiation are equivalent to high energy short duration doses is like equating jumping off a 3-foot wall ten times with jumping off a 30-foot wall once. Please ask your colleague if his analogy applies to microwave radiation. Where I worked, "radiation safety" generally meant "atomic radiation safety", including ionizing radiation (a bit like the bullet in bumper's analogy) and gamma radiation. These tend to interact with tissue much differently than microwave (radio) radiation. -- Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA * Change "netto" to "net" to email me directly * Updated! "Transponders in Sailplanes" http://tinyurl.com/y739x4 * New Jan '08 - sections on Mode S, TPAS, ADS-B, Flarm, more * "A Guide to Self-launching Sailplane Operation" at www.motorglider.org |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
"A Guide to Transponders in Sailplanes" - updated!
Herb wrote:
Excellent update on your fine article, thanks Eric! Have to disagree regarding your points on NiMH batteries, though. I've now flown now for over 2 years with them (including a dedicated transponder battery) and I love them. Weight is about 60% of sealed lead-acid, same for volume. The big advantage I see is in being able to quick-charge them with 2A in a couple of hours very safely with cheap automatic chargers available for example from all-battery.com or ebay. I fly with 2 batteries for instrumentation/radio, each 5AH and one for the transponder that has 10AH. One of the smaller batteries is in the tail. Having much less mass in the area behind the headrest is another plus. Shop around and find that the prices are affordable and pre-wired 12V packs are offered. Your Googling was more productive than mine! Please send links to the batteries and chargers you use, and part numbers if you can. I'll review them and rewrite that section as needed. I have not found the higher discharge rate in storage to be a factor. And pilots who find it is a factor might be able to counter it with solar panel on the trailer. -- Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA * Change "netto" to "net" to email me directly * Updated! "Transponders in Sailplanes" http://tinyurl.com/y739x4 * New Jan '08 - sections on Mode S, TPAS, ADS-B, Flarm, more * "A Guide to Self-launching Sailplane Operation" at www.motorglider.org |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
"A Guide to Transponders in Sailplanes" - updated!
On Feb 20, 9:35 pm, Eric Greenwell wrote:
Herb wrote: Excellent update on your fine article, thanks Eric! Have to disagree regarding your points on NiMH batteries, though. I've now flown now for over 2 years with them (including a dedicated transponder battery) and I love them. Weight is about 60% of sealed lead-acid, same for volume. The big advantage I see is in being able to quick-charge them with 2A in a couple of hours very safely with cheap automatic chargers available for example from all-battery.com or ebay. I fly with 2 batteries for instrumentation/radio, each 5AH and one for the transponder that has 10AH. One of the smaller batteries is in the tail. Having much less mass in the area behind the headrest is another plus. Shop around and find that the prices are affordable and pre-wired 12V packs are offered. Your Googling was more productive than mine! Please send links to the batteries and chargers you use, and part numbers if you can. I'll review them and rewrite that section as needed. I have not found the higher discharge rate in storage to be a factor. And pilots who find it is a factor might be able to counter it with solar panel on the trailer. -- Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA * Change "netto" to "net" to email me directly * Updated! "Transponders in Sailplanes"http://tinyurl.com/y739x4 * New Jan '08 - sections on Mode S, TPAS, ADS-B, Flarm, more * "A Guide to Self-launching Sailplane Operation" atwww.motorglider.org Eric, Here is a link for the battery (10Ah): http://www.all-battery.com/index.asp...OD&ProdID=1344 The charger I use is on the same page. I just ordered 10 individual NiMh batteries of 10Ah capacity on ebay but will have to wire the pack up myself. The price was only $60 plus $10 for shipping: http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...MEWN:IT&ih=014 Regards, Herb |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
"A Guide to Transponders in Sailplanes" - updated!
Tim Mara wrote:
...a Transponder equipped aircraft is also REQUIRED to have the transponder ON and reporting at all times from wheels up to wheels down.... Yes, we keep bumping against this reg whenever the subject comes up. What is the rationale behind such a requirement? Whose interests does it serve to differentiate between uninstalled transponders and unused transponders? Is it just another example of bureaucratic passive/aggressive bitchiness, or is there an actual Safety of Flight context that thoughtful glider pilots can appreciate? Jack |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
"A Guide to Transponders in Sailplanes" - updated!
On Feb 22, 9:17 am, J a c k wrote:
Tim Mara wrote: ...a Transponder equipped aircraft is also REQUIRED to have the transponder ON and reporting at all times from wheels up to wheels down.... Yes, we keep bumping against this reg whenever the subject comes up. What is the rationale behind such a requirement? Whose interests does it serve to differentiate between uninstalled transponders and unused transponders? Is it just another example of bureaucratic passive/aggressive bitchiness, or is there an actual Safety of Flight context that thoughtful glider pilots can appreciate? Jack I suspect it is to prevent thinking like "I'll just turn this little box off and bust whatever FAR I feel like cuz noboby can see me" (even if ATC can see you as a primary on radar). Seems a perfectly fine requirement for a powered aircraft and I'd be surprised if gliders were front and center in any thinking about this requirement. As for bitchiness, the FAA seems to be showing perfect restraint in not enforcing the thing you seemed concerned about, and therefore helping encourage use of transponders in sailplanes. Of course we can keep whining about this and other requirements and maybe in a long shot end up with removing a regulation that does not seem to be enforced or maybe worse end up with more regulations, maybe mandatory Mode-C/ADS-B for all flight... For many people flying in high-traffic areas, and that's a lot more than just around Reno, it is not outrageous to expect them to install batteries (and/or possibly solar panels at significantly higher cost) so they can operate transponders thought quite long flights. So there is no need to turn off those transponders - and in those areas that *is* a safety of flight issue. Darryl |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Phrase "landing runway" vs. "cleared to land" | Robert M. Gary | Piloting | 168 | February 5th 08 05:32 PM |
Phrase "landing runway" vs. "cleared to land" | Robert M. Gary | Instrument Flight Rules | 137 | February 5th 08 05:32 PM |
FS: 1996 "Aircraft Of The World: A Complete Guide" Binder Sheet Singles | [email protected] | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | January 5th 07 09:50 AM |
Old polish aircraft TS-8 "Bies" ("Bogy") - for sale | >pk | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | October 16th 06 07:48 AM |