If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Sad day for Mxsmanic
"Mxsmanic" wrote in message ... Steve Foley writes: I doubt an old DOS version will recognise a USB joystick, and I don't think you'll find a game port that will plug into your 64 Bit DualCore motherboard. Since DOS didn't support USB, there's no need to recognize a USB joystick in DOS applications. You can't even understand what others mean in their posts. No wonder your a shut in, social interaction with you has to be tedious at best. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Sad day for Mxsmanic
"Mxsmanic" wrote in message
... Steve Foley writes: No it cannot. It would end in disaster. Why? It has not been demonstrated to my satisfaction that any other outcome is possible. I do not accept your conjecture as proof. When you have evidence that someone with nothing but simulator experience has successfully landed an airliner full of passengers, let me know. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Sad day for Mxsmanic
"Steve Foley" wrote in message ... "Mxsmanic" wrote in message ... Steve Foley writes: No it cannot. It would end in disaster. Why? It has not been demonstrated to my satisfaction that any other outcome is possible. I do not accept your conjecture as proof. When you have evidence that someone with nothing but simulator experience has successfully landed an airliner full of passengers, let me know. This will be a circular conversation where MS insists that simulation is close enough that it could easily be pulled off with no further proof. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Sad day for Mxsmanic
"Mxsmanic" wrote in message ... Mike Ash writes: The bit in the article where he talks about a simmer being asked to land a passenger plane after the pilots have been debilitated is pretty funny. Absolutely no mention whatsoever of the difficulty or improbability of actually pulling off such a feat. It is simply assumed that it could be done. It can easily be done. Large commercial transports are heavily automated, and most flights are conducted under computer control for most of their durations. With the automation in operation, no particular flying skill is required to keep the aircraft flying, and since the automation can also land the aircraft, no particularly flying skill is required for landing, either. Because of this, any person of reasonable intelligence who can follow instructions precisely can land an airliner, with help over the radio from a pilot. Many people imagine a non-pilot grabbing the yoke and wrestling the aircraft to the ground, Hollywood-style, and that type of scenario is indeed implausible and likely to end in failure. But it's a very unrealistic scenario, because in reality the automation would fly the plane, and the non-pilot would never have to touch the controls. As long as he can follow instructions, press buttons, and turn dials, he can land the airplane (or, more precisely, he can direct the computer to land the airplane). This has already been demonstrated on multiple occasions in full-motion sims. In fact, some people are able to land airliners by hand without any previous instruction, as long as they have an instructor to guide them. It's not rocket science. It's actually easier to land an airliner than it is to land a small aircraft, because small aircraft usually have only limited automation, just as small aircraft pilots usually have no clue about how large airliners work, and tend to assume that everything flies like their Cessnas. You simply must be on drugs, or you are naive you shouldn't walk to school alone. |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Sad day for Mxsmanic
"Mxsmanic" wrote in message ... Mike Ash writes: When it's tested, either with an actual in-flight crisis or by having somebody set it up as an experiment, then I will believe it. Until then, please do not act as though the unknown is certain. And no, I don't mean testing it in a simulator. The simulators are good enough for the FAA and the airlines, so they're good enough for me. Anything is good enough for you. You are satisfied to live in a hole in France. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Sad day for Mxsmanic
"Mxsmanic" wrote in message ... Steve Foley writes: No it cannot. It would end in disaster. Why? He says with the usual child like gaze. |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Sad day for Mxsmanic
"Mxsmanic" wrote in message ... writes: Yep, all the software for DOS and an EGA display, not to mention the Apple II stuff is still running, assuming you can find hardware that still runs outside a museum. Well-behaved MS-DOS applications do indeed still run today. And of course MS-DOS itself still runs. Yeah, I wouldn't be surprise if your tight ass wasn't still running it. Why don't you get a real job and upgrade? |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Sad day for Mxsmanic
"Darkwing" theducksmail"AT"yahoo.com wrote in message
... This will be a circular conversation where MS insists that simulation is close enough that it could easily be pulled off with no further proof. Maybe semi-circular. When he responds with the same conjecture, there won't be any point in repeating myself. |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Sad day for Mxsmanic
Mxsmanic wrote:
writes: Yep, all the software for DOS and an EGA display, not to mention the Apple II stuff is still running, assuming you can find hardware that still runs outside a museum. Well-behaved MS-DOS applications do indeed still run today. And of course MS-DOS itself still runs. So you are admitting that not ALL DOS applications will run today, only "Well-behaved MS-DOS applications"? -- Jim Pennino Remove .spam.sux to reply. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Apology re mxsmanic | terry | Piloting | 96 | February 16th 08 05:17 PM |
Mxsmanic : Your results are in | Mayo Clinic | Piloting | 13 | May 24th 07 02:01 PM |
I saw Mxsmanic on TV | Clear Prop | Piloting | 8 | February 14th 07 01:18 AM |
Mxsmanic | gwengler | Piloting | 30 | January 11th 07 03:42 AM |
Getting rid of MXSMANIC | [email protected] | Piloting | 33 | December 8th 06 11:26 PM |