If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Howdy!
In article .net, Steven P. McNicoll wrote: "Michael Houghton" wrote in message ... ...such as "November 1234, radar contact..." An instruction is an authoritative direction to be obeyed. What part of "November 1234, radar contact..." do you consider to be an instruction? My bad. Your postulate was invalid. "November 1234, radar contact." is not an instruction. It does, however, "establish two-way radio communication" which authorizes entry into Class C airspace. Entry into Class C airspace does not require affirmative instructions, unlike Class B airspace which requires an affirmative clearance. If ATC wants you to remain clear, they have to keep saying so if they are going to communicate using your tail number. yours, Michael -- Michael and MJ Houghton | Herveus d'Ormonde and Megan O'Donnelly | White Wolf and the Phoenix Bowie, MD, USA | Tablet and Inkle bands, and other stuff | http://www.radix.net/~herveus/ |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
"Michael Houghton" wrote in message ... My bad. Your postulate was invalid. "November 1234, radar contact." is not an instruction. It does, however, "establish two-way radio communication" which authorizes entry into Class C airspace. Negative. Communications are established only once per flight, that was done with the first communications exchange. Entry into Class C airspace does not require affirmative instructions, unlike Class B airspace which requires an affirmative clearance. If ATC wants you to remain clear, they have to keep saying so if they are going to communicate using your tail number. No. ATC only has to issue any given instruction once. It remains in effect until overridden by another instruction or the original request is dropped. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Steven,
Once told to memain clear you must remain clear until the controller issues an instruction that permits entry. I sort of thought that when the controller called me by tail number and said radar contact (and didn't say remain clear), that would constitute a communication that permits entry. But you wrote: ... entering without an explicit instruction that permitted entry, such as "proceed on course" or "fly heading xxx", would be a violation ... What determines which communications permit entry? Can you point me to a reference in the FAR or AIM? Do say "proceed on course", but how is that an explicit instruction to enter the class C airspace? I would think "cleared to enter class C airspace" would be an explicit instruction, but I certainly never hear that because I didn't think that was necessary for class C, only class B. I don't understand why you think "proceed on course" is an explicit instruction that permits entry. (It certainly wouldn't be explicit if we were talking about class B.) Again, a reference to something that would help be know exactly which communications constituted explicit instruction to enter vs. not would help me for the future. John Gaquin wrote: When you're talking about airspace entry, etc., pilot/controller interaction is *never* "understood", or "presumed". Clear and direct statements are used. .... When you hear the phrase '....cleared to enter...', or '....cleared into...', or some such. I keep my airplane at a class C airport and don't think I ever hear that type of language. When the controller calls my tail number and doesn't tell me to remain clear then it means that I can enter. John Harlow wrote: Lol - in my experience, either the airspace is too busy - or you sound like you could be a nuisance. I think it might be standard practice for this AFB. I don't think the airspace was busy. I guess they don't want people flying in until they can see them on their screens. I hope I didn't sound like a nuisance. John Harlow wrote: When you explicitly get permission to enter. I though when they called my tail number and didn't tell me to remain clear that was permission. Where is what I need to hear defined in the FAR or AIM? Maule Driver wrote: Did the controller contact the pilot after departure before the pilot called himself? The controller called me (my speculation is that he called me upon seeing me on his radar). Nathan Young wrote: Irrespective of regulations - it never hurts to ask the controller for clarification. I agree with you, but at the time it didn't occur to me that I needed any clarification. I heard my tail number and did not hear another remain clear and thought that meant I could enter. The ONLY reason that I questioned this was that my pilot friend who was on board questioned it first. And he said that he honestly didn't know, but believed that I should have heard something else before entering. Yes, I ask when I am confused about something ... but only if I realize that I am confused. :-) Anyway I prefer to get straightened out on these things on the ground when possible so that I don't have to continually quiz the controllers about things that I'm expected to know while in the air. Steven P. McNicoll: It ends upon receipt of ATC instructions that permit entry. Which are defined where? Thank-you! |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
"Arden Prinz" wrote in message om... Steven, Once told to memain clear you must remain clear until the controller issues an instruction that permits entry. I sort of thought that when the controller called me by tail number and said radar contact (and didn't say remain clear), that would constitute a communication that permits entry. It does, unless the controller instructs you to remain clear of the Class C airspace, as was the case here. But you wrote: ... entering without an explicit instruction that permitted entry, such as "proceed on course" or "fly heading xxx", would be a violation ... What determines which communications permit entry? Can you point me to a reference in the FAR or AIM? Do say "proceed on course", but how is that an explicit instruction to enter the class C airspace? I would think "cleared to enter class C airspace" would be an explicit instruction, but I certainly never hear that because I didn't think that was necessary for class C, only class B. I don't understand why you think "proceed on course" is an explicit instruction that permits entry. (It certainly wouldn't be explicit if we were talking about class B.) Again, a reference to something that would help be know exactly which communications constituted explicit instruction to enter vs. not would help me for the future. The last instruction issued by ATC in this case was "remain clear of the Class C airspace. That instruction remains in effect until overridden by another instruction. How can it be any other way? If you were IFR and assigned eight thousand, at what point can you descend to six thousand? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message
ink.net... The last instruction issued by ATC in this case was "remain clear of the Class C airspace. That instruction remains in effect until overridden by another instruction. How can it be any other way? Well, suppose the pilot returns tomorrow and establishes two-way communication with the Class C controller. Yesterday's remain-clear instruction still has not been explicitly rescinded. So is it still in effect, or can the pilot now enter the Class C? --Gary |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
"Gary Drescher" wrote in message
"Steven P. McNicoll" The last instruction issued by ATC in this case was "remain clear of the Class C airspace. That instruction remains in effect until overridden by another instruction. How can it be any other way? Well, suppose the pilot returns tomorrow and establishes two-way communication with the Class C controller. Yesterday's remain-clear instruction still has not been explicitly rescinded. So is it still in effect, or can the pilot now enter the Class C? I think you are getting to the heart of the matter. The key is that the "remain clear' was issued before departure. It is a meaningless admonishment by ATC. They can't clear you to enter before departure anymore than they need to tell you to remain clear. What it is really meant to convey is that "just because you are about ready to depart and we've made radio contact with N-numbers, don't think it means that radio contact has been established for the purpose of entering my Class C - let's talk after you depart" |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
"Maule Driver" wrote in message m... I think you are getting to the heart of the matter. The key is that the "remain clear' was issued before departure. It is a meaningless admonishment by ATC. They can't clear you to enter before departure anymore than they need to tell you to remain clear. Meaningless before departure, meaningful after departure. What it is really meant to convey is that "just because you are about ready to depart and we've made radio contact with N-numbers, don't think it means that radio contact has been established for the purpose of entering my Class C - let's talk after you depart" What it really means is "remain outside Class C airspace until I say something that permits entry." |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
"Gary Drescher" wrote in message news:6idXb.310621$na.463020@attbi_s04... Well, suppose the pilot returns tomorrow and establishes two-way communication with the Class C controller. Yesterday's remain-clear instruction still has not been explicitly rescinded. So is it still in effect, or can the pilot now enter the Class C? What happened yesterday? Why didn't the pilot respond to the controller's calls? |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message
ink.net... "Gary Drescher" wrote in message news:6idXb.310621$na.463020@attbi_s04... Well, suppose the pilot returns tomorrow and establishes two-way communication with the Class C controller. Yesterday's remain-clear instruction still has not been explicitly rescinded. So is it still in effect, or can the pilot now enter the Class C? What happened yesterday? Why didn't the pilot respond to the controller's calls? Who said the pilot didn't respond? ATC: "Cessna 12345, remain clear of Class C". N12345: "Roger". N12345 flies around the Class C to some destination, then returns the following day and establishes the requisite two-way communication before entering Class C. Is yesterday's "remain clear" instruction still in effect? If not, when did it expire? --Gary |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
You do not need a "Clearance" to enter Class C, however you do need two way
communications and be recognized as stated below in the Airmen Information Manual. Richard 3. Arrival or Through Flight Entry Requirements. Two-way radio communication must be established with the ATC facility providing ATC services prior to entry and thereafter maintain those communications while in Class C airspace. Pilots of arriving aircraft should contact the Class C airspace ATC facility on the publicized frequency and give their position, altitude, radar beacon code, destination, and request Class C service. Radio contact should be initiated far enough from the Class C airspace boundary to preclude entering Class C airspace before two-way radio communications are established. NOTE- 1. If the controller responds to a radio call with, "(aircraft callsign) standby," radio communications have been established and the pilot can enter the Class C airspace. 2. If workload or traffic conditions prevent immediate provision of Class C services, the controller will inform the pilot to remain outside the Class C airspace until conditions permit the services to be provided. 3. It is important to understand that if the controller responds to the initial radio call without using the aircraft identification, radio communications have not been established and the pilot may not enter the Class C airspace. EXAMPLE- 1. [Aircraft callsign] "remain outside the Class Charlie airspace and standby." 2. "Aircraft calling Dulles approach control, standby." "Arden Prinz" wrote in message om... Recently I was departing a small airport (with no control tower) which was underneath the class C shelf area of a somewhat larger airport (which is an air force base). Immediately before departing, I called the approach controller for the class C airspace and told him that I was departing and would like flight following. I was actually hoping to fly straight over the larger airport (they weren't busy due to the time). The approach controller assigned me a transponder code and told me "after departure remain clear of the class C airspace". So after I took of, I started flying a route taking me around the class C area that extended to the surface. Well, the controller then called me by my tail number and asked some questions (I don't remember exactly what -- it might have been my expected cruising altitude and aircraft type, I think he may have also said radar contact, although I can't remember the specifics right now). As soon as this happened, I turned and headed directly toward my destination, taking me across the class C to the surface airspace. A fellow pilot was with me, and he later mentioned that thought I might have violated the controller's instructions. Hmmmm... That brings up a question --- when does the "remain clear of class C airspace" instruction end? I figured that since he called my by tail number and was clearly communicating with me and didn't assign any vectors or repeat his direction to remain clear, that it was now understood that I could enter. The controller didn't give any indication that I had done anything wrong, but I want to be sure that I understand this for the future. So ... if I'm told to remain clear in the future, WHEN does that end? Thank-you. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Mountain flying instruction: McCall, Idaho, Colorado too! | [email protected] | General Aviation | 0 | March 26th 04 11:24 PM |
Windshields - tint or clear? | Roger Long | Piloting | 7 | February 10th 04 02:41 AM |
Is a BFR instruction? | Roger Long | Piloting | 11 | December 11th 03 09:58 PM |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 01:27 PM |