A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Oxygen regulators, medical type



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old November 5th 15, 11:19 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 465
Default Oxygen regulators, medical type

I'm looking for an inexpensive oxygen system for occasional flights up to 18,000 feet MSL. It seems easy to get a used medical type bottle with a regulator that includes a flow restriction built in. You can select, e.g., a 1 lpm flow rate right on the regulator. But, in a glider, you won't be able to reach this control when it is mounted behind the seat. My question is: with this type of regulator, if you add a flow valve and meter downstream, between that regulator and a cannula, and you open the flow on the medical regulator, but shut the added flow valve (unless and until you reach an altitude high enough to need oxygen), will the flow restrictor on the regulator protect the low-pressure hoses from excessive pressure, or will pressure build up enough to pop the hoses?

A side question is how to re-fill such a bottle.
  #2  
Old November 5th 15, 11:56 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,124
Default Oxygen regulators, medical type

On Thursday, November 5, 2015 at 6:19:34 PM UTC-5, wrote:
I'm looking for an inexpensive oxygen system for occasional flights up to 18,000 feet MSL. It seems easy to get a used medical type bottle with a regulator that includes a flow restriction built in. You can select, e.g., a 1 lpm flow rate right on the regulator. But, in a glider, you won't be able to reach this control when it is mounted behind the seat. My question is: with this type of regulator, if you add a flow valve and meter downstream, between that regulator and a cannula, and you open the flow on the medical regulator, but shut the added flow valve (unless and until you reach an altitude high enough to need oxygen), will the flow restrictor on the regulator protect the low-pressure hoses from excessive pressure, or will pressure build up enough to pop the hoses?

A side question is how to re-fill such a bottle.


Sounds a bit like do it yourself brain surgery.
Don't be a fool, buy proper equipment. This is a life support system.
UH
  #3  
Old November 6th 15, 12:04 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
AS
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 653
Default Oxygen regulators, medical type

On Thursday, November 5, 2015 at 6:56:53 PM UTC-5, wrote:
On Thursday, November 5, 2015 at 6:19:34 PM UTC-5, wrote:
I'm looking for an inexpensive oxygen system for occasional flights up to 18,000 feet MSL. It seems easy to get a used medical type bottle with a regulator that includes a flow restriction built in. You can select, e.g., a 1 lpm flow rate right on the regulator. But, in a glider, you won't be able to reach this control when it is mounted behind the seat. My question is: with this type of regulator, if you add a flow valve and meter downstream, between that regulator and a cannula, and you open the flow on the medical regulator, but shut the added flow valve (unless and until you reach an altitude high enough to need oxygen), will the flow restrictor on the regulator protect the low-pressure hoses from excessive pressure, or will pressure build up enough to pop the hoses?

A side question is how to re-fill such a bottle.


Sounds a bit like do it yourself brain surgery.
Don't be a fool, buy proper equipment. This is a life support system.
UH


I can only second UH! I happened to attend a wave camp in the WVa where one participants decided to use a cheap medical mask on his A8A-regulator. Due to the cold, the mask shrank more than the hose and it fell out of the mask without him noticing. Although he correctly readjusted the flow according to altitude gain and the flow indicator showed 'green', the O2 was not getting to his mask. When it was getting late, we radioed the pilot and he was answering completely incoherent. We talked him into pulling the spoilers. He came down and landed with a huge headache. He stated that he had no recollection of being above 18,000'; the barograph (remember those?;-) )showed that he was well above the wave window's ceiling!
Sorry if I went off on a tangent here but it shows what happens if you skimp on vital equipment. You could end up paying the ultimate price!

Uli
AS
  #4  
Old November 9th 15, 03:08 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
AS
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 653
Default Oxygen regulators, medical type

On Friday, November 6, 2015 at 7:04:08 AM UTC-5, AS wrote:
On Thursday, November 5, 2015 at 6:56:53 PM UTC-5, wrote:
On Thursday, November 5, 2015 at 6:19:34 PM UTC-5, wrote:
I'm looking for an inexpensive oxygen system for occasional flights up to 18,000 feet MSL. It seems easy to get a used medical type bottle with a regulator that includes a flow restriction built in. You can select, e.g., a 1 lpm flow rate right on the regulator. But, in a glider, you won't be able to reach this control when it is mounted behind the seat. My question is: with this type of regulator, if you add a flow valve and meter downstream, between that regulator and a cannula, and you open the flow on the medical regulator, but shut the added flow valve (unless and until you reach an altitude high enough to need oxygen), will the flow restrictor on the regulator protect the low-pressure hoses from excessive pressure, or will pressure build up enough to pop the hoses?

A side question is how to re-fill such a bottle.


Sounds a bit like do it yourself brain surgery.
Don't be a fool, buy proper equipment. This is a life support system.
UH


I can only second UH! I happened to attend a wave camp in the WVa where one participants decided to use a cheap medical mask on his A8A-regulator. Due to the cold, the mask shrank more than the hose and it fell out of the mask without him noticing. Although he correctly readjusted the flow according to altitude gain and the flow indicator showed 'green', the O2 was not getting to his mask. When it was getting late, we radioed the pilot and he was answering completely incoherent. We talked him into pulling the spoilers.. He came down and landed with a huge headache. He stated that he had no recollection of being above 18,000'; the barograph (remember those?;-) )showed that he was well above the wave window's ceiling!
Sorry if I went off on a tangent here but it shows what happens if you skimp on vital equipment. You could end up paying the ultimate price!

Uli
AS


Not wanting to beat a dead horse any further but I found this very informative WW-II US Navy training film on this subject:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C6Hg7gzz9jE

Uli
AS
  #5  
Old November 6th 15, 01:23 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
shkdriver shkdriver is offline
Member
 
First recorded activity by AviationBanter: Aug 2008
Posts: 69
Default Oxygen regulators, medical type

On Thursday, November 5, 2015 at 5:19:34 PM UTC-6, wrote:
I'm looking for an inexpensive oxygen system for occasional flights up to 18,000 feet MSL. It seems easy to get a used medical type bottle with a regulator that includes a flow restriction built in. You can select, e.g., a 1 lpm flow rate right on the regulator. But, in a glider, you won't be able to reach this control when it is mounted behind the seat. My question is: with this type of regulator, if you add a flow valve and meter downstream, between that regulator and a cannula, and you open the flow on the medical regulator, but shut the added flow valve (unless and until you reach an altitude high enough to need oxygen), will the flow restrictor on the regulator protect the low-pressure hoses from excessive pressure, or will pressure build up enough to pop the hoses?

A side question is how to re-fill such a bottle.


I agree with uncl..., would you scuba dive with cobbled together equipment.
  #6  
Old November 6th 15, 02:19 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Mark628CA
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 145
Default Oxygen regulators, medical type

The short answer is, yes, the pressure will most probably build to a point that the hoses and/or connections will fail with the system blocked downstream of a simple flow restricting orifice.

Most regulators for aviation use (i.e. Mountain High E & S) have an internal diaphragm that shuts off flow when the downstream pressure equals the upstream pressure. I highly recommend regulators with this feature, for obvious reasons.

At the same time, I can also recognize the (cheaper) alternatives IF YOU DO NOT SHUT OFF THE FLOW COMPLETELY. The pressure will not increase to the point that mechanical components (tubes and connectors) are likely to fail. However, don't forget to turn the flow rate up when you salvage your flight with a low save and are feeling like a superhero for getting back above 12,000. I have heard more than one badly performed bit of karaoke on the radio when somebody forgot to adjust the O2 flow at altitude.

Pressure in the cylinder is often at 2,200 psi or more (using Aviators Breathing Oxygen from a reputable supplier) but nominal pressure is generally from 1,800 to 2,000 psi on a full tank. Most regulators (orifice type) only reduce the pressure to 15-100 psi, and do not shut the flow off when this pressure is reached, allowing the downstream pressure to eventually try to match the much higher cylinder pressure, resulting in failure of the downstream components. Don't worry, your head won't explode, but you might freak out at the sudden pop and hissing noise when it happens. And then the cylinder empties at an enthusiastic rate.

Please extinguish your cigarettes when this happens, or your whole airplane might explode. or at least turn into a merry little fireball.

Regulators with a diaphragm will regulate the pressure to the optimum level needed to operate the delivery mechanism, whether it is an electronic demand system (MH EDS) or a simple flow meter. Medical regulators are not capable of doing anything but reducing pressure to a manageable rate suitable for a constant flow rate with no change in altitude (and therefore increased O2 requirement).

In a nutshell- buy the best stuff for the application (aviation). If you get cheap crap because you are, well, cheap, don't shut off the flow entirely..

It is just your life, so go as cheap as you think it is worth. Remember that Oxygen refills are generally pretty cheap, and unless you have an extremely small cylinder, saving O2 by shutting the flow down doesn't save much in the way of time vs. altitude. Especially when you have to constantly remind yourself to turn it up at altitude or turn it down when the "houses get bigger." The automatic demand systems (M H E&S) take that out of the equation, so you can just concentrate on flying as best you can.

(I have been giving this lecture to hang glider and sailplane pilots since 1988, when I started selling 02 systems. I am also a dealer for M H E&S. In 2014, I got 147 hours of airtime. I was on 02 for 136 of them.)

Have fun, but don't be stupid. Just because you do not use 02 very often does not mean that you should go cheap. Oxygen is fuel for your brain.
  #7  
Old November 6th 15, 02:51 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 465
Default Oxygen regulators, medical type

Thanks for the advice, Mark. I'd love an EDS system. But here in the East we rarely go high enough to need oxygen, it seems that spending $1000 on a system is overkill for use once a year or so. Also, we have very few convenient places around here to refill, other than at "wave camp".

Do those medical regulators not have a diaphragm? You'd think that's necessary, in order to shut off (at least mostly) the flow coming from the high pressure cylinder? I was guessing they have a diaphragm-based pressure reduction followed by an orifice to set the flow rate, but I may be wrong. And perhaps even the diaphragm system would have some leakage through the high pressure side valve even when it's supposedly shut because the diaphragm senses that the output pressure is high. Then again, these regulators have an "off" position, on the same knob as the non-zero flow rates. If that is simply a zero-size orifice, wouldn't the pressure then build up dangerously in the low-pressure side of that device?
  #8  
Old November 6th 15, 03:48 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
JS
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,384
Default Oxygen regulators, medical type

On Thursday, November 5, 2015 at 6:51:25 PM UTC-8, wrote:
Thanks for the advice, Mark. I'd love an EDS system. But here in the East we rarely go high enough to need oxygen, it seems that spending $1000 on a system is overkill for use once a year or so. Also, we have very few convenient places around here to refill, other than at "wave camp".

Do those medical regulators not have a diaphragm? You'd think that's necessary, in order to shut off (at least mostly) the flow coming from the high pressure cylinder? I was guessing they have a diaphragm-based pressure reduction followed by an orifice to set the flow rate, but I may be wrong. And perhaps even the diaphragm system would have some leakage through the high pressure side valve even when it's supposedly shut because the diaphragm senses that the output pressure is high. Then again, these regulators have an "off" position, on the same knob as the non-zero flow rates. If that is simply a zero-size orifice, wouldn't the pressure then build up dangerously in the low-pressure side of that device?


Agree with others... It's life support.
As evidenced in another thread, it's easy enough to get yourself into trouble on the "occasional 18,000' flight". 100% brain power when that happens is fairly important.
Jim
  #9  
Old November 6th 15, 06:20 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Jonathan St. Cloud
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,463
Default Oxygen regulators, medical type

An Aerox system is cheaper than an EDS, maybe half the price. This is life support, as in LIFE, this epitomizes "pound foolish". If you really wanted to save the money on an O2 system, the much smarter choice is to stay at lower altitudes where you do not need it. This is not something to jury rig or kluge together on a budget with parts not designed for this use. Honestly!!!!

On Thursday, November 5, 2015 at 6:51:25 PM UTC-8, wrote:
Thanks for the advice, Mark. I'd love an EDS system. But here in the East we rarely go high enough to need oxygen, it seems that spending $1000 on a system is overkill for use once a year or so. Also, we have very few convenient places around here to refill, other than at "wave camp".

  #10  
Old November 6th 15, 03:48 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Richard[_9_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 551
Default Oxygen regulators, medical type

On Thursday, November 5, 2015 at 6:51:25 PM UTC-8, wrote:
Thanks for the advice, Mark. I'd love an EDS system. But here in the East we rarely go high enough to need oxygen, it seems that spending $1000 on a system is overkill for use once a year or so. Also, we have very few convenient places around here to refill, other than at "wave camp".

Do those medical regulators not have a diaphragm? You'd think that's necessary, in order to shut off (at least mostly) the flow coming from the high pressure cylinder? I was guessing they have a diaphragm-based pressure reduction followed by an orifice to set the flow rate, but I may be wrong. And perhaps even the diaphragm system would have some leakage through the high pressure side valve even when it's supposedly shut because the diaphragm senses that the output pressure is high. Then again, these regulators have an "off" position, on the same knob as the non-zero flow rates. If that is simply a zero-size orifice, wouldn't the pressure then build up dangerously in the low-pressure side of that device?


I also agree that you should not cobble an Oxygen System. Please read this article about Hypoxia

http://www.craggyaero.com/hypoxia.htm

Mountain High has the constant flow systems including a cylinder price range from $500 to $600.

http://www.craggyaero.com/xcr_systems1.htm

EDS system with a small bottle about $849

http://www.craggyaero.com/edssystem1.htm

Call to get exact prices and cylinder sizes.

Richard
www.craggyaero.com

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FA: Gas Regulators Skrud Home Built 0 August 21st 06 03:19 AM
Class III medical, Sport Pilot Medical, Crohn's disease [email protected] Piloting 3 August 15th 05 01:44 PM
Help With Medical Problem Identified During Medical Exam pjbphd Piloting 30 September 8th 04 12:59 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:00 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.