If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#171
|
|||
|
|||
Way off topic, but it has do to with the French
On Mar 3, 7:59 pm, Phil J wrote:
On Mar 3, 6:18 pm, Rich Ahrens wrote: Phil J wrote: Churchill was so concerned about it that he ordered the English army to prepare to use poison gas to defend England's beaches in the event of a German invasion. The old ******* was fond of poison gas in general. Ask the Kurds and Pashtuns, for instance. "I do not understand the squeamishness about the use of gas. I am strongly in favour of using poison gas against uncivilised tribes." Yeah, Churchill didn't really see a moral difference between using high explosives and using poison gas. In World War II, the U.S. got involved as well. In 1943 a U.S.Liberty ship called the John Harvey carried a shipment of liquid mustard gas to the port of Bari, Italy. It was to be held in reserve in case the Germans decided to use poison gas. Because the shipment was top secret, the ship had to wait with all the others to unload. They waited in the harbor for five days. At the time, the Allied authorities were convinced that the Luftwaffe wasn't a threat in that area, so they kept the harbor fully lighted at night so they could continue unloading ships. A formation of 105 Ju-88s snuck in under radar and attacked the port, and it was the worst Allied loss of shipping in a bombing raid since Pearl Harbor. The John Harvey exploded and released the liquid mustard gas which mixed with oil on the water. Over 600 were treated for exposure, and 69 died. The whole thing was hushed up by the English and American governments because they were afraid the Germans would start using poison gas if they knew the Allies were working with it. AFAIK poison gas was never actually used by either side in World War II, thank God. Phil "Poison gas" was used extensively during the Great War. One of the post-war conclusions was that it was more trouble than it was worth and had only limited tactical value. The environmental conditions had to be just so, and often the burden placed on friendly troops reduced their own combat effectiveness. The reason the Axis was so reluctant to employ such weapons was more practical than moral -- contrary prevailing winds, and a tactical emphasis on the offensive made gas unattractive as a battlefield weapon. The only great unknown is why the Germans didn't use it in the last throes of the Reich. There are very few weapons which use cannot be justified in one extremity or the other. Despite all the bad press, MAD worked, and kept the nuclear option the untapped resource. Dan |
#172
|
|||
|
|||
Way off topic, but it has do to with the French
On Mar 3, 7:16*pm, " wrote:
"Poison gas" was used extensively during the Great War. One of the post-war conclusions was that it was more trouble than it was worth and had only limited tactical value. The environmental conditions had to be just so, and often the burden placed on friendly troops reduced their own combat effectiveness. The reason the Axis was so reluctant to employ such weapons was more practical than moral -- contrary prevailing winds, and a tactical emphasis on the offensive made gas unattractive as a battlefield weapon. The only great unknown is why the Germans didn't use it in the last throes of the Reich. That is a mystery. There are very few weapons which use cannot be justified in one extremity or the other. I suppose there is always the "desperate times call for desperate measures" argument. But the kind of horrible, painful death you get from poison gas just seems to put it into a different category. Despite all the bad press, MAD worked, and kept the nuclear option the untapped resource. Dan- Except for Hiroshima and Nagasaki. But as bad as they were, more Japanese were killed by the incendiary bombs we dropped than by the atomic bombs. There were plans being made in the American military to use atomic bombs to soften up the beaches if it became necessary to invade Japan. They didn't realize the effects the radiation would have had on our troops when they came ashore. That would have been a catastrophe for both sides. Surprisingly (to me), the most expensive weapon system America developed during World War II was not the atomic bomb. It was the B-29 that dropped it. Phil |
#173
|
|||
|
|||
Way off topic, but it has do to with the French
Phil J wrote:
On Mar 3, 7:16*pm, " wrote: "Poison gas" was used extensively during the Great War. One of the post-war conclusions was that it was more trouble than it was worth and had only limited tactical value. The environmental conditions had to be just so, and often the burden placed on friendly troops reduced their own combat effectiveness. The reason the Axis was so reluctant to employ such weapons was more practical than moral -- contrary prevailing winds, and a tactical emphasis on the offensive made gas unattractive as a battlefield weapon. The only great unknown is why the Germans didn't use it in the last throes of the Reich. That is a mystery. Hitler was temporarily blinded by mustard gas in WWI. So that may have had some influence (excepting the use of gas in concentration camps - Hitler suggested using poison gas on Jews in Mein Kampf, where he also recounted his experience in WWI with mustard gas.) In fact Wikipedia claims a cite in support of the following statement: "One notable poison gas casualty of the Great War was Adolf Hitler, who was temporarily blinded. As a result, Hitler adamantly refused to authorise the use of poison gas on the battlefield during World War II, for fear of retaliation.[32]" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Use_of_...in_World_War_I Trivia: Hitler allegedly originally wore a "Kaiser" style mustache at the start of WWI but was ordered to clip it to the now-infamous "Toothbrush" style so it would fit under the respirator masks used during mustard gas attacks. Reference: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toothbrush_moustache |
#174
|
|||
|
|||
Way off topic, but it has do to with the French
Was gas not used in the concentration camps?
On Mar 3, 7:59*pm, Phil J wrote: On Mar 3, 6:18*pm, Rich Ahrens wrote: Phil J wrote: Churchill was so concerned about it that he ordered the English army to prepare to use poison gas to defend England's beaches in the event of a German invasion. The old ******* was fond of poison gas in general. Ask the Kurds and Pashtuns, for instance. "I do not understand the squeamishness about the use of gas. I am strongly in favour of using poison gas against uncivilised tribes." Yeah, Churchill didn't really see a moral difference between using high explosives and using poison gas. In World War II, the U.S. got involved as well. *In 1943 a U.S.Liberty ship called the John Harvey carried a shipment of liquid mustard gas to the port of Bari, Italy. *It was to be held in reserve in case the Germans decided to use poison gas. *Because the shipment was top secret, the ship had to wait with all the others to unload. *They waited in the harbor for five days. *At the time, the Allied authorities were convinced that the Luftwaffe wasn't a threat in that area, so they kept the harbor fully lighted at night so they could continue unloading ships. *A formation of 105 Ju-88s snuck in under radar and attacked the port, and it was the worst Allied loss of shipping in a bombing raid since Pearl Harbor. *The John Harvey exploded and released the liquid mustard gas which mixed with oil on the water. *Over 600 were treated for exposure, and 69 died. *The whole thing was hushed up by the English and American governments because they were afraid the Germans would start using poison gas if they knew the Allies were working with it. AFAIK poison gas was never actually used by either side in World War II, thank God. Phil |
#175
|
|||
|
|||
Way off topic, but it has do to with the French
So the "target of jokesters" supports your conclusion that...?
Sorry.. having a hard time keeping up. ::YAWN:: For a supposedly educated man, you sure have a short attention span. Oh, well. If you wish to continue this slightly interesting discussion, let me know. It's a topic of great interest. Meanwhile, back to flying. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#176
|
|||
|
|||
Way off topic, but it has do to with the French
Well you've not shown yourself in a good light at all in this thread.
I think you should rethink you attitudes and preconceptions. I don't have attitudes and preconceptions -- but I do have a minor in history from the University of Wisconsin, Where everyone majors in drinking... You say that like it was a bad thing... ;-) -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#177
|
|||
|
|||
Way off topic, but it has do to with the French
Oh, well. If you wish to continue this slightly interesting discussion,
let me know. It's a topic of great interest. Whoo-weee. Don't even *try* to parse that paragraph. Yet another reason not to post after a QB meeting... ;-) -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#178
|
|||
|
|||
Way off topic, but it has do to with the French
"Jay Honeck" wrote in
news:UH4zj.7552$TT4.6644@attbi_s22: So the "target of jokesters" supports your conclusion that...? Sorry.. having a hard time keeping up. ::YAWN:: For a supposedly educated man, you sure have a short attention span. Oh, well. If you wish to continue this slightly interesting discussion, let me know. It's a topic of great interest. Meanwhile, back to flying. Yeah, right. Look at what's talkin. Bertie |
#179
|
|||
|
|||
Way off topic, but it has do to with the French
"Jay Honeck" wrote in
news:gR4zj.7561$TT4.2072@attbi_s22: Oh, well. If you wish to continue this slightly interesting discussion, let me know. It's a topic of great interest. Whoo-weee. Don't even *try* to parse that paragraph. Yet another reason not to post after a QB meeting... ;-) Oh brother. Bertie |
#180
|
|||
|
|||
Way off topic, but it has do to with the French
Aratzio wrote in
: My nephew was stationed at Aviano. My brother and I went over and spent 2 weeks at the time of the kid's 21st Bday. I could live around there. Yeah. i don't know of Aviano. Whart part? I haven;t been in the south much except for just quick visits, but I'd like to see more of that part. Sorrento, Sicily and so on.. So many places, so little time.. Bertie |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Off-topic, but in need of help | Alan Erskine | Aviation Photos | 20 | January 5th 07 06:21 AM |
Off-topic, but in need of help | dennis | Aviation Photos | 0 | January 4th 07 10:40 PM |
Almost on topic... | Richard Lamb | Home Built | 22 | January 30th 06 06:55 PM |
French but on topic... | ArVa | Military Aviation | 2 | April 16th 04 01:40 AM |
off topic | Randall Robertson | Simulators | 0 | January 2nd 04 01:29 PM |