If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#71
|
|||
|
|||
Way off topic, but it has do to with rednecks
Please pay attention. The last two *were* reported to be mentally
handicapped women unaware of what they were doing. You need to try to understand that these are passionate believers in their cause. No more or less. The suicide bombers are not mentally handicapped and their goal is to enact retribution against their enemy. Wouldn't the US call them freedom fighters if they were were working for your nterests? Did you know that your #1 enemy was a US sponsored "freedom fighter" before he was cut off and left out to dry? That might have made him realize something don't you think? |
#72
|
|||
|
|||
Way off topic, but it has do to with rednecks
LWG wrote:
That's a possibility, but I don't see it that way. Your hypothesis suggests that there is a master strategy on the part of the adversary. I think that since 9/11 we have effectively neutralized OBL. We don't have his scalp, but his C&C has been destroyed. Did the attacks in Spain galvanize the people against Radislam? Did the 7/7 attacks unite the British people in support of Blair? Which countries in Europe are truly helping us in the fight against Radislam? I think they would have done as much to us as they possibly could. The bipartisan agreement between the D's and R's after 9/11 lasted a few months. What did they have to lose by attacking again? My thesis is that Radislam views us as weak, cowardly and vulnerable. An attack -- any attack -- would have supported their view. One thing I've always found interesting when someone puts out the "we haven't been attacked since" card is that no one in the national media to my knowledge anyway, has even come close to suggesting something so basic to common sense that it defies explanation. Anyone with half a strategic brain has to at least consider the fact that the reason could very well be that they don't WANT to attack us again...at least not yet. You could be right. I could be right. Who really knows? History will no doubt sort this thing out for all of us. -- Dudley Henriques |
#73
|
|||
|
|||
Way off topic, but it has do to with rednecks
Except that they lost the news cycle. Iraq is not the divisive issue it was
18 months ago. L'audace, toujours l'audace. To me, the terrorist strategy is glaringly apparent. You first split the country, then you let it destroy itself from within. You sit back and watch. It's the old divide and conquer all over again, only this time it smells of camel crap :-) |
#74
|
|||
|
|||
Way off topic, but it has do to with rednecks
LWG wrote:
Except that they lost the news cycle. Iraq is not the divisive issue it was 18 months ago. L'audace, toujours l'audace. To me, the terrorist strategy is glaringly apparent. You first split the country, then you let it destroy itself from within. You sit back and watch. It's the old divide and conquer all over again, only this time it smells of camel crap :-) Oh I don't know. Just in our family we have division. It's not just the war that was affected. It's the whole liberal/conservative thing :-)) -- Dudley Henriques |
#75
|
|||
|
|||
Way off topic, but it has do to with rednecks
On Feb 29, 1:10*pm, "LWG" wrote:
Please pay attention. *The last two *were* reported to be mentally handicapped women unaware of what they were doing. See the word "reported". Now try to stop looking foolish: "BAGHDAD, Feb 21 (Reuters) - The U.S. military conceded on Thursday it did not know if two women who carried out bombings in Baghdad that killed almost 100 people were mentally handicapped, casting doubt on earlier assertions." Do you really want to be a sucker who can be manipulated? No? Then engage your brain and _try_ to recognize the spin you are being fed all day. Cheers |
#76
|
|||
|
|||
Way off topic, but it has do to with rednecks
On Feb 29, 10:08*am, "Jay Honeck" wrote:
Jay, your thinking illustrates why such problems exist. You need to try to understand that these are passionate believers in their cause. No more or less. The suicide bombers are not mentally handicapped and their goal is to enact retribution against their enemy. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6889106/ If strapping explosives to kids with Down's Syndrome isn't sick, I don't know what is. What is sad that you so readily believe such a (unsubstantiated) story. Cheers |
#77
|
|||
|
|||
Way off topic, but it has do to with the French
On Feb 28, 3:29*pm, "Steven P. McNicoll"
wrote: "Phil J" wrote in message ... Definitely, not every weapon they had was superior. *But their combination of fast motorized infantry supported with armor and dive- bombers and their Blitzkrieg tactics made them pretty hard to beat. Their fighter aircraft weren't too shabby either, especially the FW-190. The Blitzkrieg days were long gone by the time the Fw 190 appeared on the scene. You're right. I was thinking it was introduced earlier, but it didn't come along till 1941. One of the more surprising (to me) pieces of technology developed by the Germans was the radio-controlled glide bomb used against shipping. They were dropped from a bomber and flown into the target by radio control. They also had radar-guided glide bombs, and near the end of the war they were even working on a television-guided bomb, but it was not perfected. They weren't a factor in the war, but I think some of the most amazing stuff designed in World War II was the asymmetrical aircraft by Blohm and Voss. Definitely "outside of the box" thinking. Phil |
#78
|
|||
|
|||
Way off topic, but it has do to with rednecks
So in my very humble opinion, everything seems to suggest that
disengaging from the region will have no negative affects on our security (except oil I suppose) Wow, you say that like oil isn't the driving force behind the world economy. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#79
|
|||
|
|||
Way off topic, but it has do to with rednecks
Two into the WTC.
One into the Pentagon. Why not the White House, and Congress? Don't forget the plane that was brought down by the passengers. That one was supposedly aimed at the Washington, possibly the White House. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#80
|
|||
|
|||
Way off topic, but it has do to with the French upgraded to equal opportunity insulter
The Spanish are all excited to see their new submarines ready to
deploy. These beautifully designed subs have glass bottoms so the new Spanish navy can get a really good look at the old Spanish navy. The old sailors in my workgroup here are roaring. Same here. My son has decided that he probably shouldn't tell that joke when he visits Spain next month... ;-) -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Off-topic, but in need of help | Alan Erskine | Aviation Photos | 20 | January 5th 07 06:21 AM |
Off-topic, but in need of help | dennis | Aviation Photos | 0 | January 4th 07 10:40 PM |
Almost on topic... | Richard Lamb | Home Built | 22 | January 30th 06 06:55 PM |
French but on topic... | ArVa | Military Aviation | 2 | April 16th 04 01:40 AM |
off topic | Randall Robertson | Simulators | 0 | January 2nd 04 01:29 PM |