If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#61
|
|||
|
|||
Gary Boggs wrote:
I really appreciate all this good input, thank you all for responding. Now for a new twist, one of our members has built a "pay out winch". Haven't heard about that, but I _have_ heard about a hairy thing called "step towing", which is something the hang-glider pilots do from small fields. They winch up to say 150m, have the winch pay out as the fly back, turn and take another winch launch from altitude! This can of course be repeated for as many times as practical, and some respectable altitudes can be gained. Imagine this done with a glider and dyneema or spectra cord for wire. You would of course have to modify the tow-hook to not automatically back-release (shudder, gulp!)... Well, if someone actually tries this with a sailplane I'm not sure I'd want to know. They would certainly not be allowed to fly _my_ glider anyway. Christian 8-) |
#62
|
|||
|
|||
"F.L. Whiteley" wrote in message ...
If it's soarable, one launch should do most days. Most seasons I winch launched regularly I can count on one hand the number second snaps taken per season to soar away. Of course, _big wings_ do help, but that's another thread;^) This season, I only took two aerotows to 2000agl. My other AT releases were 1200 to 1700agl, that is, at or below winch height and near enough to the airfield to presume had we been winching, getting away was pretty likely. For a number of reasons we didn't winch much this season, but when we did, we soared. This included thermals on New Year's Day and wave on Feb 1 and thermals each subsequent winch day this season. Looks like snow for November 1st though. Last Saturday would have been perfect as lift was 10kts to 12K in a stiff NW breeze. The kind of day we get 2500+agl on the wire. Frank Whiteley ************************************************** ******************************** You guys should get a really good winch and pay someone to operate it during the week. During the summer you could become a vacation destination. Since there are nonstop flights from Europe to Denver every day, you could probably get enough Brits and others to pay for your winch and some rental gliders in a few summers. |
#63
|
|||
|
|||
"Eric Greenwell" wrote in message .. . In article , mowry86 @hotmail.com says... Beware of the raw statistics. How about this one: 100% of 2003 US glider fatalities occur after aerotow. Sounds like a good tag line for a winch manufacturer advertisement Unfortunately, not true: some have occurred after self-launch, and I know there have been some ground launch fatalities (how recently, I can't remember) -- !Replace DECIMAL.POINT in my e-mail address with just a . to reply directly Eric Greenwell Richland, WA (USA) The following occured in the launch phase Two fatals I'm aware of. A homebuilt failed structurally in a winch launch in Colorado some years ago and apparently another homebuilt crashed in North Carolina in the past couple of weeks on auto tow. Not clear whether the NC accident pilot was even trained in ground launch. Perhaps someone in that neck of the woods can offer more information. A Russia was damaged in Wyoming a few years back on auto tow at a private ranch strip, however, the grapevine reported the pilot had no specific ground launch training and cart-wheeled the glider. IIRC, it was properly repaired and sold. A sometimes RAS poster was seriously injured in a winch launch accident involving a Phoebus C in Georgia a few years ago. (stalled all-flying tail to excessive pitch-up to wing stall, wing-drop, and rolled inverted to impact) Any others? Certainly there have been a few at Torrey Pines over the decades, though environmental factors have been a big player there. Frank Whiteley |
#64
|
|||
|
|||
The HG community used (has used) pay-out winches for a number of years. At
least one major auto maker produced a limited production launch vehicle pick-up truck as advertised on national TV. Others were retro-fits or home grown. The current generation of US UL gliders, Sparrowhawk and Lighthawk, could probably use these as supplied. The Apis and Silent might need something a bit more stout. Frank Whiteley "Gary Boggs" wrote in message ... I really appreciate all this good input, thank you all for responding. Now for a new twist, one of our members has built a "pay out winch". A pay out winch is a drum with a break on it. The glider hooks up about 200' behind the tow vehicle, and as the glider climbs, the line spools out. Does anybody have any experience with this type of launch? How much runway do you need for this type of launch, how high can you get, ect? Boggs "Stefan" wrote in message ... Bob Johnson wrote: Your ability to get 600 m releases with a winch on a 1200 m strip seems extraordinary. It all depends on the wind. With zero wind, the rule of thumb is that you get approximately 1/3 the cable lengh. More with headwind, much more with strong headwind. With extraordirarily strong headwind, you can even kite. (Yes, it has been done.) Stefan |
#65
|
|||
|
|||
Bob Johnson wrote:
Eggert -- Those are really good numbers for your winch. With V8 300 HP (GMC 454 c.i., 7.4 L), and 5000 ft (1550 m) Plasma line laid out, we are getting the rule of thumb 1/3 cable length releases of 1700 ft (525 m). This is into 10-15 kt wind. Much over that, we leave the Blanik in the barn! BJ Midland, Texas Eggert Ehmke wrote: Bob Johnson wrote: Mr. Ehmke -- Your ability to get 600 m releases with a winch on a 1200 m strip seems extraordinary. Is your cable length just 1200 m also or is it greater than your strip length? That's 1200 m of cable laid out, with a V8 240 HP engine at the other end. What I told is the normal range - with strong wind aligned to the runway we had 750 m (2460 feet) agl with a double seated ASK21. I did not see this launch, but it sounds reasonable. 650 m I have experienced myself. Eggert 1/3 cable length seems low. There was in France an experiment showing 40% cable length without wind with cable length from 1000 to 2000 m. See HTTP://www.gliderforum.com/thread-vi...geID=1466#1466 |
#66
|
|||
|
|||
soarski wrote:
... As for Gary Boggs, the only thing I can suggest is to go to Germany for a summer and learn the trade. Winches, how to run them, including the infrastructure. (Telephone) Why telephone rather than radio? Radio let everybody know what is happening, rather than only the two persons at bot end of telephone. Likely mandatory when there is some other activity in parallel (aero tow, power flying ...). On the other hand, with more reasonable selflaunchers coming out, the winch effort may not be the answer anymore in the US. There are enough reasons mentioned in this thread. What does "reasonable" mean here? Selflaunchers are a way to increase the cost of flying, winch is a way to decrease it. |
#67
|
|||
|
|||
Robert --
I would like to learn how they do this. Our Blanik has perhaps the best located CG hook on any sailplane I'm aware of, although some would say the bridle is somewhat awkward to use. On a typical tow, with the Blanik weighing about 1100 lb, the 300 hp winch engine throttle is advanced to the forward stop in 3 seconds and at this time the engine is already rapidly approaching redline 5000 RPM. At this point the Blanik is already beginning its climb and the throttle is eased. This quick takeoff and climb performance is still not fast enough to load the ship and its occupants to more than about 0.8 - 0.9 G horizontal acceleration, which I think one would have do to attain any more than the 1/3 line length releases we are attaining. We limit our climb airspeed to 55-60 kt, which I believe is the POH recommendation. Very little if any back stick is necessary, and the Blanik attains the 55 kt climb pretty much on its own until the last part of the 45 second tow, when some back stick is applied to counter the downward (with respect to the ground) pull of the rope. Our Spectra/Dyneema/Plasma plastic rope weighs less than its full 66 lb when partially wound on the drum, so line weight (and its necessary acceleration and ground contact friction) for us is practically negligible. If there is a better setup anywhere in the world, I would sure appreciate a description. Thanks for your reply, BJ Midland, Texas http://www.permiansoaring.us/ Robert Ehrlich wrote: Bob Johnson wrote: Eggert -- Those are really good numbers for your winch. With V8 300 HP (GMC 454 c.i., 7.4 L), and 5000 ft (1550 m) Plasma line laid out, we are getting the rule of thumb 1/3 cable length releases of 1700 ft (525 m). This is into 10-15 kt wind. Much over that, we leave the Blanik in the barn! BJ Midland, Texas Eggert Ehmke wrote: Bob Johnson wrote: Mr. Ehmke -- Your ability to get 600 m releases with a winch on a 1200 m strip seems extraordinary. Is your cable length just 1200 m also or is it greater than your strip length? That's 1200 m of cable laid out, with a V8 240 HP engine at the other end. What I told is the normal range - with strong wind aligned to the runway we had 750 m (2460 feet) agl with a double seated ASK21. I did not see this launch, but it sounds reasonable. 650 m I have experienced myself. Eggert 1/3 cable length seems low. There was in France an experiment showing 40% cable length without wind with cable length from 1000 to 2000 m. See HTTP://www.gliderforum.com/thread-vi...geID=1466#1466 |
#68
|
|||
|
|||
Mike Borgelt wrote in message . ..
On Sat, 25 Oct 2003 12:43:35 -0700, "Gary Boggs" wrote: Someone must have already compared the safety of these tow launch methods. What do the statistics show is the safer method of launch? Aero tow seems to involve more inherent dangers to me. For one thing, there is just more time for things to go wrong. What could be more dangerous than to tie tow airplanes together and try to fly? Gary Boggs I've only done about two winch launches but have done several hundred car tows and driven several hundred also. Two winch launches. Helps to understand why you say what you say later on. Ground launches involve lots of wire, rope etc. It is probably a good observation that the more rope you have the more trouble you can get into! With one exception below. I've had the glider run over the wire and tangle in the wheel well. Not good as you now cannot release and depend on the tow driver.. Pilot reactions to a low altitude winch launch failure are utterly critical. I suspect we've killed dozens if not hundreds over the years this way around the world. Yes, the reaction is critical. But even more important is the correct attitude corresponding to airspeed and altitude at all times. This does make the reaction when something goes wrong a quite a bit less critical. I guess we have about 0.5 cable breaks and 2 or 3 weak link breaks per 1000 launches. We do about 3500 winch launches a year. It can happen and if the pilot is properly instructed he knows this and is prepared. I do not consider cable break or engine failure to be a _problem_ when launching even when it happens. You may need more than one launch to get away(rare with aerotow). Normally not. Someone mentioned the stresses in the wire and the glider. Both are much lower in properly executed arotow. Stresses are normally higher, but where's the problem in that? The glider is built to easily take those stresses and we change the wire once a year anyway. Aero tow may have a higher exposure to an off airport landing in unsuitable terrain but the failures seem to be much more rare than winch wire breaks. If you don't use toy towplanes(less than 180HP) then any place suitable for winching probably gives you the opportunity to do a 180 or land straight ahead from an aerotow. Definite 'No' on the 'probably gives you' bit. From a winch launch you should _always_ be able to land on the runwyay. I know lots of airfields where you have a certain time, sometimes only two or three seconds, sometimes ages, in the aero tow when you definitely do _not_ want _anything_ to go wrong. The suitability of the airfield for whinch launching has no relevance here. If you want gliding to be popular aerotow involves less running around on the ground per flight hour. Don't see why. Only thing to do additionally is retrieveing the winch cable. And the guy drives, he doesn't run. And: If you want gliding to be more popular among the people living near the airfield you should stop making such a racket with those ancient technology fuel to noise converters. Instead we do 80% of our launches with 0.4 litres of Diesel. Flying towplanes is more fun than driving a winch or tow car.(Allegedly - I last sat in a towplane in 1971 writing down CHT's for the cooling test for 4 tows in a row and haven't felt motivated to get into a towplane since despite the aquisition of a PPL 9 years ago) Aerotowing danger can be reduced by using a longer rope. One of the local clubs around here tried it and liked it so much the towpilots won't fly with short ropes. The long rope gives everyone more time to handle upsets. I suspect the rise of the towplane upset accident coincided with using shorter ropes. Agree to all that. Regards Marcel |
#69
|
|||
|
|||
On Wed, 29 Oct 2003 10:02:06 +0000, Robert Ehrlich
wrote: Why telephone rather than radio? Radio let everybody know what is happening, rather than only the two persons at bot end of telephone. Likely mandatory when there is some other activity in parallel (aero tow, power flying ...). Nothing worse than someone else interfering during the critical phase of a winch launch (initial acceleration). Bye Andreas |
#70
|
|||
|
|||
Bob Johnson wrote:
I would like to learn how they do this. Our Blanik has perhaps the best located CG hook on any sailplane I'm aware of, although some would say the bridle is somewhat awkward to use. On a typical tow, with the Blanik weighing about 1100 lb, the 300 hp winch engine throttle is advanced to the forward stop in 3 seconds and at this time the engine is already rapidly approaching redline 5000 RPM. At this point the Blanik is already beginning its climb and the throttle is eased. As a winch driver, I allways try to leave the throttle in the position it has when the plane leaves the ground, for about the first 1/3 of the climb. Then I slightly slow down, depending on the wind and the climb angle of the plane. This can mean full throttle for a double seater and almost idle for a Ka8 with strong headwind. This method works in all wind conditions. With an ASK21 or Grob G103, the ground roll is not longer than 2 or 3 seconds. The first ca. 100 feet we keep a flat attitude, than we go slightly into a climb angle of about 40 degrees. We limit our climb airspeed to 55-60 kt, which I believe is the POH recommendation. This seems a bit slow for me, but may be correct for the Blanik. The ASK21 has a recommended speed of about 60 kt, and 65 is no problem. More speed means more lift too. Very little if any back stick is necessary, and the Blanik attains the 55 kt climb pretty much on its own until the last part of the 45 second tow, when some back stick is applied to counter the downward (with respect to the ground) pull of the rope. In the last part of the climb it is even important to give the stick a little forward, so the angle between cable and plane does not exceed the point where the backrelease is triggered. That way you can stay longer on the rope, getting higher. Also the release is much softer. Just my 2 cents... Eggert |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Parachute fails to save SR-22 | Capt.Doug | Piloting | 72 | February 10th 05 05:14 AM |
spaceship one | Pianome | Home Built | 169 | June 30th 04 05:47 AM |
The Internet public meeting on National Air Tour Standards begins Feb. 23 at 9 a.m. | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 0 | February 22nd 04 03:58 PM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |
using winch instead of aerotow | goneill | Soaring | 5 | August 27th 03 02:46 PM |