A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » General Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

763 Cruising Speed.



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old January 30th 04, 09:01 PM
Tarver Engineering
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Saryon" wrote in message
...
You should pay more attention, sock.


Um, nice try but I'm also not a sock. Don't even know and haven't met
anyone from any of these groups in the real world.


What does your sock name and fake email address represent?


  #12  
Old January 30th 04, 09:19 PM
Tarver Engineering
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Saryon" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 30 Jan 2004 13:01:42 -0800, "Tarver Engineering"
wrote:


"Saryon" wrote in message
.. .
You should pay more attention, sock.

Um, nice try but I'm also not a sock. Don't even know and haven't met
anyone from any of these groups in the real world.


What does your sock name and fake email address represent?


A wish to not have any additional spam sent to me. I get enough junk
email already. I'm assuming your email is correct? I'll drop it a
note from my real email. There are a number of things that I
probabally am, but a sock I'm not.


Of course my email is real, only a sock troll hides beind a fake name and
email address.


  #13  
Old January 31st 04, 12:35 PM
ShawnD2112
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Sorry. Gotta jump in here. I work in the airline industry and we use 744,
733, etc regularly. Have never heard anyone, not even people at Boeing,
drop the first 7. Not saying it isn't done, just not in this sector of the
industry.

Shawn
"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message
...

"Saryon" wrote in message
...

B762 L2J/H 767-200 BOEING
B763 L2J/H 767-300 BOEING
B764 L2J/H 767-400 BOEING

Your assertion was that it's a "673" because you always drop the
leading 7. I can't find 673 anywhere in the list.


I expect those would be apropriate contractions for your correspondence

with
FAA, but here in the real world, the first 7 is dropped. Note carefully
that you have been corrected by an engineer, an air traffic controller and
pilots. If you want to use an insider secret code, don't expect anyone to
know what you are gibbering about.




  #14  
Old January 31st 04, 05:05 PM
Jim Knoyle
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"ShawnD2112" wrote in message
...
Sorry. Gotta jump in here. I work in the airline industry and we use

744,
733, etc regularly. Have never heard anyone, not even people at Boeing,
drop the first 7. Not saying it isn't done, just not in this sector of

the
industry.

Shawn, welcome to Tarverland. :-)
JK

"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message
...

"Saryon" wrote in message
...

B762 L2J/H 767-200 BOEING
B763 L2J/H 767-300 BOEING
B764 L2J/H 767-400 BOEING

Your assertion was that it's a "673" because you always drop the
leading 7. I can't find 673 anywhere in the list.


I expect those would be apropriate contractions for your correspondence

with
FAA, but here in the real world, the first 7 is dropped. Note carefully
that you have been corrected by an engineer, an air traffic controller

and
pilots. If you want to use an insider secret code, don't expect anyone

to
know what you are gibbering about.






  #15  
Old February 1st 04, 04:42 AM
Dean Wilkinson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Amen Jim, another one for the Tarver chronicles.

I am an engineer, and I worked for Boeing for 8 years, primarily on
the AIMS Display System for the 777.

Airline equipment codes on every ticket I have ever purchased always
read 73x, 74x, 75x, 76x, 77x where x is the first digit of the dash
number.

Tarver, once again you are talking out of your ass. Below is the
official listing of equipment codes used by the FAA for flight plan
filing:

B17 Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress
B29 Boeing B-29 Superfortress
B52 Boeing BJ-52 Stratofortress
B701 Boeing 707-100 (C-137b)
B703 Boeing 707-300 (C-18, C-137c,E-8 J-Stars,Ec/Kc-
B712 Boeing 717-200
B720 Boeing 720
B721 Boeing 727-100 (C-22)
B722 Boeing 727-200
B72Q Boeing 727 Stage 3 (Us Only)
B731 Boeing 737-100
B732 Boeing 737-200 Surveiller(CT-43, VC-96)
B733 Boeing 737-300
B734 Boeing 737-400
B735 Boeing 737-500
B736 Boeing 737-600
B737 Boeing 737-700, Bbj, C-40
B738 Boeing 737-800
B739 Boeing 737-900
B73Q Boeing 737 Stage 3 (Us Only)
B741 Boeing 747-100
B742 Boeing 747-200 (E-4, VC-25)
B743 Boeing 747-300
B744 Boeing 747-400(International, Winglets) (AL-1)
B74D Boeing 747-400 (Domestic, No Winglets)
B74R Boeing 747sr
B74S Boeing 747sp
B752 Boeing Model 757-200 (C-32)
B753 Boeing 757-300
B762 Boeing 767-200
B763 Boeing 767-300
B764 Boeing 767-400
B772 Boeing Model 777-200
B773 Boeing 777-300

There, squashed a flea with a hammer...

Dean Wilkinson
B.S.E.E.


"Jim Knoyle" wrote in message ...
"ShawnD2112" wrote in message
...
Sorry. Gotta jump in here. I work in the airline industry and we use

744,
733, etc regularly. Have never heard anyone, not even people at Boeing,
drop the first 7. Not saying it isn't done, just not in this sector of

the
industry.

Shawn, welcome to Tarverland. :-)
JK

"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message
...

"Saryon" wrote in message
...

B762 L2J/H 767-200 BOEING
B763 L2J/H 767-300 BOEING
B764 L2J/H 767-400 BOEING

Your assertion was that it's a "673" because you always drop the
leading 7. I can't find 673 anywhere in the list.

I expect those would be apropriate contractions for your correspondence

with
FAA, but here in the real world, the first 7 is dropped. Note carefully
that you have been corrected by an engineer, an air traffic controller

and
pilots. If you want to use an insider secret code, don't expect anyone

to
know what you are gibbering about.




  #16  
Old February 1st 04, 05:10 PM
Tarver Engineering
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Dean Wilkinson" wrote in message
m...
Amen Jim, another one for the Tarver chronicles.


You mean the Knoyle idiot detector, or the Miller sub-idiot detector.

I'd like to know just how incompetent you are, Wilkinson.

Common usage is to suppress the first "7".


  #17  
Old February 2nd 04, 12:42 AM
Dean Wilkinson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Way more competent than you Tarver, but that is self evident.

Common usage to drop the first 7? Common with whom? Not the FAA, or
the airlines...


"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message ...
"Dean Wilkinson" wrote in message
m...
Amen Jim, another one for the Tarver chronicles.


You mean the Knoyle idiot detector, or the Miller sub-idiot detector.

I'd like to know just how incompetent you are, Wilkinson.

Common usage is to suppress the first "7".

  #18  
Old February 2nd 04, 04:00 AM
Tarver Engineering
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Dean Wilkinson" wrote in message
m...
Way more competent than you Tarver, but that is self evident.


If you buy into either of the archive trolls you are an idiot.

What did you do on the little display you worked?


  #19  
Old February 3rd 04, 01:41 PM
Thorsten Nedderhut
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

The codes listed in below message in first column are typically ICAO codes
(usually 4 characters). E.g. for Airbus the may look like
A332 for A330-200
A346 for A340-600
etc.

Or others:
AT72 for ATR 72
A124 for AN-124
CRJ7 for CRJ-700

The codes the thread was started are IATA codes which have typically 3
characters, e.g.
763 for B-767-300
343 for A340-300

Airlines typically use the IATA codes in their schedules, while ATC (at
least in Europr) is using the ICAO codes. The same is applicable for
airport codes, e.g.

IATA ICAO Name
YYZ CYYZ Toronto
ORD KORD Chicago O'hare
FRA EDDF Frankfurt
FCO LIRF Rome/Fiumicino

Regards

-Thorsten

"Dean Wilkinson" wrote in message
m...
Amen Jim, another one for the Tarver chronicles.

I am an engineer, and I worked for Boeing for 8 years, primarily on
the AIMS Display System for the 777.

Airline equipment codes on every ticket I have ever purchased always
read 73x, 74x, 75x, 76x, 77x where x is the first digit of the dash
number.

Tarver, once again you are talking out of your ass. Below is the
official listing of equipment codes used by the FAA for flight plan
filing:

B17 Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress
B29 Boeing B-29 Superfortress
B52 Boeing BJ-52 Stratofortress
B701 Boeing 707-100 (C-137b)
B703 Boeing 707-300 (C-18, C-137c,E-8 J-Stars,Ec/Kc-
B712 Boeing 717-200
B720 Boeing 720
B721 Boeing 727-100 (C-22)
B722 Boeing 727-200
B72Q Boeing 727 Stage 3 (Us Only)
B731 Boeing 737-100
B732 Boeing 737-200 Surveiller(CT-43, VC-96)
B733 Boeing 737-300
B734 Boeing 737-400
B735 Boeing 737-500
B736 Boeing 737-600
B737 Boeing 737-700, Bbj, C-40
B738 Boeing 737-800
B739 Boeing 737-900
B73Q Boeing 737 Stage 3 (Us Only)
B741 Boeing 747-100
B742 Boeing 747-200 (E-4, VC-25)
B743 Boeing 747-300
B744 Boeing 747-400(International, Winglets) (AL-1)
B74D Boeing 747-400 (Domestic, No Winglets)
B74R Boeing 747sr
B74S Boeing 747sp
B752 Boeing Model 757-200 (C-32)
B753 Boeing 757-300
B762 Boeing 767-200
B763 Boeing 767-300
B764 Boeing 767-400
B772 Boeing Model 777-200
B773 Boeing 777-300

There, squashed a flea with a hammer...

Dean Wilkinson
B.S.E.E.


"Jim Knoyle" wrote in message

...
"ShawnD2112" wrote in message
...
Sorry. Gotta jump in here. I work in the airline industry and we use

744,
733, etc regularly. Have never heard anyone, not even people at

Boeing,
drop the first 7. Not saying it isn't done, just not in this sector

of
the
industry.

Shawn, welcome to Tarverland. :-)
JK

"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message
...

"Saryon" wrote in message
...

B762 L2J/H 767-200 BOEING
B763 L2J/H 767-300 BOEING
B764 L2J/H 767-400 BOEING

Your assertion was that it's a "673" because you always drop the
leading 7. I can't find 673 anywhere in the list.

I expect those would be apropriate contractions for your

correspondence
with
FAA, but here in the real world, the first 7 is dropped. Note

carefully
that you have been corrected by an engineer, an air traffic

controller
and
pilots. If you want to use an insider secret code, don't expect

anyone
to
know what you are gibbering about.






  #20  
Old February 3rd 04, 09:32 PM
running with scissors
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message ...
"Saryon" wrote in message
news
On Thu, 29 Jan 2004 17:40:06 GMT, "Steven P. McNicoll"
wrote:


"Saryon" wrote in message
.. .

What's a 763?


Boeing 767-300.


A Boeing 767-300 is a B763.


Assuming the original poster meant B763 is not unreasonable. People
say/post 744 or 733 and have it interpreted to Boeing 747-400 or
Boeing 737-300 all the time. Not saying it's technically correct, or
even right to do, but even I'm not that pedantic in the absense of
similar designators to confuse it with...


Even though I knew what he ment, if you look at it he is dislexic.

Correctly and common is: 673



utter ****ing ******** as usual little man.

tell us again how the words "average" and "total" are interchangeable
in aircraft manuals.

tell us again how part 25 only applies to a minority of aircraft.

those LSD flashbacks of yours must be bitch. never mind, you can
always down another bottle of thunderbird with your meds little man.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Landing and T/O distances (Was Cold War ALternate Basing) Guy Alcala Military Aviation 3 August 13th 04 12:18 PM
Va and turbulent air penetration speed. Doug Instrument Flight Rules 70 January 11th 04 08:35 PM
Jet fighter top speed at military power David L. Pulver Military Aviation 18 December 1st 03 07:13 PM
#1 Jet of World War II Christopher Military Aviation 203 September 1st 03 03:04 AM
New Film: The Need For Speed - Going to war on drugs Phil Carpenter Military Aviation 0 July 23rd 03 07:43 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:52 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.