If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
"Denyav" wrote in message ... Nice way of dodging some questions. Nope its an accurate answer Very obviously. public hearing before the committee. All witnesses who retained counsel-Admiral Stark, Admiral Kimmel, and General Short-were given the opportunity to be examined by their counsel if they so desired, and to submit questions to committee counsel to be asked other. Monkey investigation designed by the designers of Pearl Harbor conspiracy to white wash their actions .Members of congress were only allowed to see what they allowed to see at that time. Quite the contary, the members of congress drove the inquiry and were not part of the 1941 administration See the minority report of the same. Which is inevitable when irrelevant issues are raised. Yeah Right,you made it clear before,every evidence if it points to a direction other than offical direction is irrelevant. And yet Stinnet claims that they are in the bnational archive http://www.independent.org/tii/news/021202Stinnett.html Yet the very same Stinnett claims that all Crane documents about intercepted pre-Pearl Harbor JN25B dispatches have been removed from Archive II because of NSA withdrawal notices and none of then are available to public scholars or even Congressmen. Actually he says they were transferred from the NSA to the National Archive and that he got them from there And thats the truth you can check it for yourself. I have NSA have issued almost three dozen withdrawal notices for Crane documents up to this date,almost all of them affecting solely pre Pearl Harbor documents. Those withdrawals are alleged to have happpened in 1999, the congressional inquiry you mentioned happened 6 years PRIOR to that date They stated not I am sure Sen.Thurman and Rep.Spence would strongly disagree with your statement. Hardly Yeah right,then you must ask Marshall why he offered his resignation upon this report? He was cheif of staff, any honorable man would do the samed No bananas here bwana, note the last thing Britain wanted in 1941 was war with Japan, it diverted massive resources away from the war in Europe at a time when the Nazis were only 150 miles away from Actually nobody really wanted a war with Japan,but Japan was,unfortunately the key to thrust America,a country with a big German-American population but ruled by an Anglo-American minority,into the war aganist Germany . Incorrect, there was no treaty requirement for Germany to go to war, Japan did NOT declare war on the USSR "As America becomes an increasingly multicultural society,it may find it more difficult to fashion a consensus on foreign policy issues ,except in the circumstances of a truly massive and widely perceived direct external threat" Zbigniew Brzezinski Grand Chessboard 1997. More irrelevance The architect of Afghan trap was right on 1941,he was also proven right in 2001. There arent too many southern baptists in London old son. But the threat the London face now is much bigger than the threat represented by the corporal or by the French Fleet,England survived under Roman rule and would very probably would have survived under French or German rule,to say at least. Aint no threat from bananas bwana Israelis have waited 2000 years to return to their homeland,they could easily wait for another 200 years to create the Greater Israel,but its very doubtful if England and London could afford to wait for 20 years. So you think the Israelis are about to invade Britain ! ROTFLMAO Keith |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Videos: Su-37 Superflanker vs F-22 Raptor | Alejandro Magno | Military Aviation | 20 | January 10th 04 05:19 PM |