If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Odd missed approach instructions
The published missed for the RNAV (GPS) RWY 04 at KROC says "Climb to 3000
direct CISON WP and via 098(degree) track to BREIT WP and hold". I'm trying to think why they'd put in that "098 track" thing instead of just saying "direct BRIET WP". The plan view makes it look like after crossing CISON you'd have to fly about 135 degrees to intercept the 098 track somewhere before BRIET. Are they trying to keep you clear of that 1030' obstacle just north west of BREIT? I was reading it as if you had to be at 3000' before you got to CISON, but I suppose you could read it that you're still on your way up to 3000' on the way between CISON and BREIT? -- Paul Tomblin http://blog.xcski.com/ "Imagine if every Thursday your shoes exploded if you tied them the usual way. This happens to us all the time with computers, and nobody thinks of complaining." -- Jef Raskin, interviewed in Doctor Dobb's Journal |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Odd missed approach instructions
"Paul Tomblin" wrote in message ... The published missed for the RNAV (GPS) RWY 04 at KROC says "Climb to 3000 direct CISON WP and via 098(degree) track to BREIT WP and hold". I'm trying to think why they'd put in that "098 track" thing instead of just saying "direct BRIET WP". The plan view makes it look like after crossing CISON you'd have to fly about 135 degrees to intercept the 098 track somewhere before BRIET. Are they trying to keep you clear of that 1030' obstacle just north west of BREIT? I was reading it as if you had to be at 3000' before you got to CISON, but I suppose you could read it that you're still on your way up to 3000' on the way between CISON and BREIT? Probably right, but also, the more specific instructions they give, the less you need to calc-on-the-fly during a MA. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Odd missed approach instructions
In a previous article, "Matt Barrow" said:
"Paul Tomblin" wrote in message ... The published missed for the RNAV (GPS) RWY 04 at KROC says "Climb to 3000 direct CISON WP and via 098(degree) track to BREIT WP and hold". I'm trying to think why they'd put in that "098 track" thing instead of just saying "direct BRIET WP". The plan view makes it look like after crossing CISON you'd have to fly about 135 degrees to intercept the 098 track somewhere before BRIET. Are they trying to keep you clear of that 1030' obstacle just north west of BREIT? I was reading it as if you had to be at 3000' before you got to CISON, but I suppose you could read it that you're still on your way up to 3000' on the way between CISON and BREIT? Probably right, but also, the more specific instructions they give, the less you need to calc-on-the-fly during a MA. This is an RNAV (GPS) approach, so direct to the next waypoint is going to involve considerably fewer calculations that trying to intercept a track. Personally, I think whoever wrote that missed approach procedure forgot that BREIT isn't an NDB any more. -- Paul Tomblin http://blog.xcski.com/ One item could not be deleted because it was missing. -- Mac System 7.0b1 error message |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Odd missed approach instructions
On Fri, 18 May 2007 17:49:00 +0000 (UTC), (Paul
Tomblin) wrote: The published missed for the RNAV (GPS) RWY 04 at KROC says "Climb to 3000 direct CISON WP and via 098(degree) track to BREIT WP and hold". I'm trying to think why they'd put in that "098 track" thing instead of just saying "direct BRIET WP". The plan view makes it look like after crossing CISON you'd have to fly about 135 degrees to intercept the 098 track somewhere before BRIET. Are they trying to keep you clear of that 1030' obstacle just north west of BREIT? I was reading it as if you had to be at 3000' before you got to CISON, but I suppose you could read it that you're still on your way up to 3000' on the way between CISON and BREIT? I agree that it is unusual, and I'm not certain of the appropriate wording in this circumstance. However, the NACO chart calls for flying the 098° track, whereas the JEPP chart call for flying a 118° track! Something is really screwed up here. Also, I believe you have misinterpreted a portion of the missed approach procedure. Probably especially important in view of that tower NW of CISON: You write, "... after crossing CISON ...". But CISON is depicted, on both the Jepp and the NACO charts, as a fly-by WP and not as a fly-over WP. "Fly-by waypoints are used when an aircraft should begin a turn to the next course prior to reaching the waypoint". So you should not be "crossing CISON". Ron (EPM) (N5843Q, Mooney M20E) (CP, ASEL, ASES, IA) |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Odd missed approach instructions
Ron Rosenfeld wrote:
I agree that it is unusual, and I'm not certain of the appropriate wording in this circumstance. However, the NACO chart calls for flying the 098° track, whereas the JEPP chart call for flying a 118° track! Something is really screwed up here. Also, I believe you have misinterpreted a portion of the missed approach procedure. Probably especially important in view of that tower NW of CISON: You write, "... after crossing CISON ...". But CISON is depicted, on both the Jepp and the NACO charts, as a fly-by WP and not as a fly-over WP. "Fly-by waypoints are used when an aircraft should begin a turn to the next course prior to reaching the waypoint". So you should not be "crossing CISON". Ron (EPM) (N5843Q, Mooney M20E) (CP, ASEL, ASES, IA) Yup! The Jepp database supplied to our Universal FMS's definitely shows a 120 degree track from CISON to BREIT, and that CISON is fly past, so you should begin your turn before the waypoint. NACO obviously goofed on this one. A double-take on the chart should alert you that 098 *cannot* take you from CISON to BREIT, as 098 is the outbound heading of the hold, and is clearly at a different angle than the CISON to BREIT leg. Happy Flying! Scott Skylane |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Odd missed approach instructions
On 2007-05-18, Paul Tomblin wrote:
This is an RNAV (GPS) approach, so direct to the next waypoint is going to involve considerably fewer calculations that trying to intercept a track. Unless you just went missed due to GPS failure? -- Ben Jackson AD7GD http://www.ben.com/ |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Odd missed approach instructions
In a previous article, Ben Jackson said:
On 2007-05-18, Paul Tomblin wrote: This is an RNAV (GPS) approach, so direct to the next waypoint is going to involve considerably fewer calculations that trying to intercept a track. Unless you just went missed due to GPS failure? Like I said, BRIET (the missed approach fix) isn't an NDB any more, so in the event of a GPS failure you wouldn't be able to fly the published missed anyway. -- Paul Tomblin http://blog.xcski.com/ If killing them all to a man is not an option then you are better off to simply leave them to slowly self destruct under their own incompetance. -- Dag |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Full deflection = missed approach ??? | pgbnh | Instrument Flight Rules | 33 | October 21st 05 01:57 PM |
Missed approach (?) when glideslope fails | Yossarian | Instrument Flight Rules | 61 | September 22nd 05 05:01 AM |
GPS missed approach question | xyzzy | Instrument Flight Rules | 15 | September 15th 05 02:24 AM |
Approach Question- Published Missed Can't be flown? | Brad Z | Instrument Flight Rules | 8 | May 6th 04 04:19 AM |
Missed approach procedure... | [email protected] | Instrument Flight Rules | 39 | November 11th 03 03:46 PM |