A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Racing airspace "violation" question



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #9  
Old September 8th 10, 01:53 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,124
Default Racing airspace "violation" question

On Sep 7, 11:02*pm, Frank wrote:
On Sep 7, 10:29*pm, Andy wrote:





On Sep 7, 5:50*pm, "John Godfrey (QT)" wrote:


For any flight for which you must turn in a log (i.e. any launch taken
from the contest site after grid time and before the day is canceled)
you may not enter closed airspace. *You can violate closed airspace
and incur the penalty whether you start or not and whether the day is
canceled or not.


No doubt that this is what SSA rules require but the rules really need
a review and I'd suggest bringing the airspace violation rules in line
with FAI.


In this case the FAI rules would have scored 66 (the OP) to the point
of furthest progress and there would have been no penalty.


The stupidity of the situation is that 66 would be 100 points better
off if he had a logger failure than if he announced his intention to
abandon the task, made a completely legal class C overflight, *and
then turned in his log.


I hope 66 was not depending on the prize money to buy groceries this
week.


Andy (the scorer in this instance)


Even more stupidly, if a contestant turns in a log with an inadvertent
airspace violation, and elects to withdraw his flight log for the day,
he/she STILL gets a zero for the day plus a 100 pt penalty the next
day. *How bizarre is that?! *The rule that says a contestant must be
offered the opportunity to withdraw his/her flight log was intended to
avoid having a record of an airspace violation hanging around where
someone from our friendly government might see it (can you say
"airline pilot career-ending"?). *However, with the present rule
interpretation, a zero on day X combined with a 100pt penalty on day X
+1 is no less incriminating than the original flight log, especially
when the score becomes 'official'.

Ya gotta love the guys who think these things up - going one way and
then the other on the same issue. *We now have the best scoring system
in the world. *It is so good that you have to consult with two
lawyers, three accountants, and a convicted felon (only the felon
really understands the system) before turning in the day's flight log

TA- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


It is not complicated.
Stay out of forbidden airspace- don't get penalty.
The contest board, and by extension the rules committee, has a clear
directive from the SSA board to have a zero tolerance policy with
respect top airspace violations. The rules reflect this directive.
If you can make a case for being lenient on violations, please try to
do so.
The decision not to permit overflight is based primarily on 2
considerations:
1) Transponders are required for overflight of some of these pieces of
airspace. To not be at a competitive disadvantage, pilots would have
to add another expensive piece of equipment(understood that some folks
would think this is a good idea) which can have an adverse affect on
participation. Don't make the mistake of making the case that they are
not required. The order of precidence in the FAR's, which was
carefully parsed, will show otherwise.
2)) There is no assurance that the pilot can positively stay out of
the airspace as he may descend into it. 40 guys all asking for OK to
fly through Class C would result in a huge mess.
"Simple" solution- stay out.
As to withdrawal of log- or non submission. Your violation is between
you and the FAA and the contest operation etc. intends to stay out of
that.
The policies here are, in part, the result of one of the most
difficult exchanges between the contest committee and the BOD and will
not be subject to change.
FWIW
UH
SSA Competition Rules Subcomittee Chair
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Fed: Planes flying in "commercial" airspace must get GPS Mxsmanic Piloting 66 June 4th 10 12:54 PM
(USA) US/Mexico "airspace" (boundary) files available Tuno Soaring 4 March 27th 10 07:17 PM
On Sharing airspace with "non-rated UAV "pilots" vaughn Piloting 15 March 15th 09 04:08 PM
"Fly Baby, you violated Class B Airspace" Ron Wanttaja Piloting 27 September 5th 07 08:30 PM
Aviation Conspiracy: Connecticut To Get "Creamed" By Airspace Redesign Change? Free Speaker General Aviation 0 August 8th 06 02:42 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:47 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.