Gliders in the Grand Canyon

A Guy Called Tyketto writes:

Back to the same issue again; If the A/FD shows that the
airport is closed (and keep in mind the A/FD is updated every 56 days),
your 3 month old 'recent sectional' is out of date and needs to be
updated. Once again, A/FD changes would supercede the chart you have.

More precisely, anything that agrees with you would supersede anything that
agrees with me.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Mxsmanic wrote:
A Guy Called Tyketto writes:

Back to the same issue again; If the A/FD shows that the
airport is closed (and keep in mind the A/FD is updated every 56 days),
your 3 month old 'recent sectional' is out of date and needs to be
updated. Once again, A/FD changes would supercede the chart you have.

More precisely, anything that agrees with you would supersede anything that
agrees with me.

You want to take it personal, that is your call. But evidence
and support of it (A/FD vs. outdated sectional/charts) still stand. Now
you're trolling, and you're not going to bait me.

Anywho, Don't take my word for it (you won't anyway). Go search
for Tuweep at http://www.naco.faa.gov and let us know what you do (more
importantly, DON'T) find.

BL.
- --
Brad Littlejohn | Email:
Unix Systems Administrator, |
Web + NewsMaster, BOFH.. Smeghead! | http://www.wizard.com/~tyketto
PGP: 1024D/E319F0BF 6980 AAD6 7329 E9E6 D569 F620 C819 199A E319 F0BF

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFGabMwyBkZmuMZ8L8RAgaOAJwLD+IumfVoZjydfl2HMm 2rZ/gWNACcDPhA
VZ6luhaf0k4q0bbyX9mxq18=
=4wS2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

On Jun 8, 5:05 pm, Mxsmanic wrote:
george writes:


you spend time in here posting upon subjects that are beyond you and
when corrected you start empty argument thus making a fool of yourself

Not really. I post questions to which I'd like to have answers. Sometimes
people give me useful answers; sometimes not. The static from the little boys
may hide the useful information (if any) from the uninitiated but not from
USENET veterans.

What you should stop and consider is how the pilots in here no matter
from whatever part of the world and levels of skill attained have very
little disagreement with each other..
And to claim that you are a veteran of the Internet is a wee bit on
the silly side.
Do you recognise this form of address?
3:774/605.112

Mxsmanic wrote:
A Guy Called Tyketto writes:

Back to the same issue again; If the A/FD shows that the
airport is closed (and keep in mind the A/FD is updated every 56 days),
your 3 month old 'recent sectional' is out of date and needs to be
updated. Once again, A/FD changes would supercede the chart you have.

More precisely, anything that agrees with you would supersede anything that
agrees with me.

Have you ever seen a real A/FD and noticed the chapter "Chart Bulletin"
where updates to charts are published or the chapter "Notices" were
the current altitudes for SFAR-50-2 are published?

I thought not; you would rather argue endlessly about something you
know little to nothing about.

--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.

george writes:

What you should stop and consider is how the pilots in here no matter
from whatever part of the world and levels of skill attained have very
little disagreement with each other..

I'm interested in all opinions. In some cases there is no answer that is
demonstrably correct from any objective standpoint.

writes:

Have you ever seen a real A/FD and noticed the chapter "Chart Bulletin"
where updates to charts are published or the chapter "Notices" were
the current altitudes for SFAR-50-2 are published?

I've seen SFAR-50-2, the one that says "extending upward from the surface" and
names a number of airfields within the SFRA.

Mxsmanic wrote in
:

A Guy Called Tyketto writes:

True; while this may be irrelevant to the Grand Canyon chart,
it goes back to the previous statement; the Grand Canyon Chart is 6
years out of date, according to the FAA; last update for that was April
19th, 2001. I understand that 'because a new chart hasn't been issued
still makes the old one current'; but it also does mean that any
changes to airports in the A/FD (closure, changes to the diagram,
layout of the airport, etc.) would supercede the chart you have, making
it old and out of date.

The most recent sectional also shows the airports.


How exciting for you. You can plug it into your nintendo, fjukkwit.


Bertie

Mxsmanic wrote in
:

A Guy Called Tyketto writes:

Back to the same issue again; If the A/FD shows that the
airport is closed (and keep in mind the A/FD is updated every 56
days), your 3 month old 'recent sectional' is out of date and needs
to be updated. Once again, A/FD changes would supercede the chart you
have.

More precisely, anything that agrees with you would supersede anything
that agrees with me.


Nothing agrees with you.


Bertie

Mxsmanic wrote in
:

writes:

Have you ever seen a real A/FD and noticed the chapter "Chart
Bulletin" where updates to charts are published or the chapter
"Notices" were the current altitudes for SFAR-50-2 are published?

I've seen SFAR-50-2, the one that says "extending upward from the
surface" and names a number of airfields within the SFRA.


So what, you can't fly into any of them and never will fjukkwit.


bertie

Mxsmanic wrote in
:

george writes:

What you should stop and consider is how the pilots in here no matter
from whatever part of the world and levels of skill attained have very
little disagreement with each other..

I'm interested in all opinions.


no you aren't


In some cases there is no answer that is
demonstrably correct from any objective standpoint.

You're an idiot.


bertie