If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#111
|
|||
|
|||
"Dan Luke" wrote in message
... "Bob Noel" wrote: But I would love to discuss this with someone who thinks that honesty, integrity, and moral are not important characteristics of the best leaders. I am very interested in what characteristics they think make the best leaders (which,' of course, also wouldn't have any bearing on what actually does make the best leaders...now my head hurts.) Mine too. Especially since what you mean by "best" is so debateable. If you mean "most able to sway the masses" then a great gift of gab makes a great leader, e.g. Adolph Hitler, Winston Churchill and Ronald Reagan (no, I'm not saying they are morally equivalent). Churchill wasn't above a bit of whoring with his American friend whose name I forget. His honesty was severely compromised by having to conceal the success of the Bletchly codebreakers, leading to many tens of thousands of deaths in the British cities which went unprotected as a result. Such is the nature of politics. But he _projected_ the aura of honesty and integrity in a way that is quite remarkable. Who, friend of foe, could ever have been in any doubt that he meant what he said in his "...fight them on the beaches..." speech (http://www.bbc.co.uk/history/war/wwt...l_audio.shtmll)? And he wrote it himself. Add to that good humor, intelligence, hard work to the point of exhaustion and willingness to share the hardships of the people. "Ask not what your country can do for you..." my arse. Its strained grammar hurts my ears for a start, and its substance an aftertaste of empty rhetoric. Honesty and integrity that matter to a point, but it is the *perception* that trumps the reality. Face it, Kennedy was lucky. If people knew 40 years back that he was permanently on pain killers and frequently incapacitated with his Addison's disease, perhaps this strange personality cult would never have got started. The thought of a strung-out junkie deciding the fate of the world from the safety of his nuclear bunker makes me shiver. A true leader would have excused himself -- heck, he wouldn't even have been medically fit to fly my Cessna -- and we're just damn lucky that today we're not all living in caves (the few of us that would have been left). -- Dr. Tony Cox Citrus Controls Inc. e-mail: http://CitrusControls.com/ |
#112
|
|||
|
|||
"C J Campbell" wrote in message ... He did claim to be a jelly donut (literal translation of "Ich bin ein Berliner"), but the wall that went up on his watch came down on the hated Reagan's watch. I thought a "Berliner" was a type of sausage. Anyway, the picture of an earnest JFK, waffling away in such seriousness, while the locals tittered and guffawed must be the highpoint of his entire presidency. Wish I'd been there. -- Dr. Tony Cox Citrus Controls Inc. e-mail: http://CitrusControls.com/ |
#113
|
|||
|
|||
Tony Cox wrote:
"C J Campbell" wrote in message ... He did claim to be a jelly donut (literal translation of "Ich bin ein Berliner"), but the wall that went up on his watch came down on the hated Reagan's watch. I thought a "Berliner" was a type of sausage. Anyway, the picture of an earnest JFK, waffling away in such seriousness, while the locals tittered and guffawed must be the highpoint of his entire presidency. Wish I'd been there. Sorry to disappoint, but I was there (attending a German "Hochschule" that year) and heard no comments at all on the minor grammatical error from Germans. I only saw mention of it in the American press. Any "tittering" must have been drowned out in the loud applause and cheering in response to that statement of his. |
#114
|
|||
|
|||
mike regish wrote:
So I guess you're going with the "faulty intelligence" spin, then. And you believe that Bush had the best interests of Iraq and the US as real reasons for pushing this war. After all, that's what he keeps saying now. Yeah. "Buhs" is just a paragon of virtue. OK. And did Clinton have the best interests of Iraq and the US as real reasons when he launched a massive offensive in Baghdad in 1998 "Operation Desert Fox"? He certainly felt he did. And in Bosnia, when thousands were slaughtered in the air in the guise of ending "genocide"? Or in Haiti? Or in Somalia? Now, in Iraq, hundreds of thousands of graves HAVE been found. The torture chambers (some of) HAVE been found. And even CNN now admits that it covered up the torture and brutal murder it knew was going on in Iraq for a decade, so that it could stay on Hussein's good side. Don't take my word, Click here to hear Clinton say it in his own words: http://tinyurl.com/67rz (small audio file) Thank goodness we finally have a President who not only gets the message, but takes action. P.S. "Buhs" is actually a pretty apt name for him, considering his party days. P.S. Unlike say, Clinton's party days? Or does he count as a saint as you bring someone's alleged personal life into the picture yourself? |
#115
|
|||
|
|||
Montblack wrote:
("C J Campbell" wrote) snip He did claim to be a jelly donut (literal translation of "Ich bin ein Berliner"), but the wall that went up on his watch came down on the hated Reagan's watch. Fall of The Wall was 1989 - Bush's watch. Folks may have marched up to it on Reagan's watch, but it was Bush who was on station when she toppled. Your point doesn't make sense. Nixon was on station when Apollo 11 landed on the moon, but it is safe to "march it up" to Kennedy. |
#116
|
|||
|
|||
"Icebound" wrote in message .rogers.com... What is it with the US policy about Cuba anyway? We should have never given it back after the Spanish-American war :-) |
#117
|
|||
|
|||
"Tom S." wrote in message ... Since LBJ's wife was a major shareholder in the transportation company (marine shipping) that had virtually a monopoly contract to ship war material to Vietnam...well, you can guess the rest. Lady Bird was owner of the Johnson businesses in name only. |
#118
|
|||
|
|||
"Tom S." wrote in message ... The biggest problem is that Joseph Kennedy was hardly the type to instill a sound sense of morals in his sons. You mean backing the Nazi's...even after being named ambassador to England and the Battle of Britain... That's just the tip of the iceberg. His whole life was devoted to the advancement of the Kennedy name in advance of all else. |
#120
|
|||
|
|||
in article , Bob Noel
at lid wrote on 11/14/03 11:15 AM: In article md9tb.147048$mZ5.1005335@attbi_s54, "Michael 182" wrote: Sorry, I don't see any correlation between fidelity, infidelity, and public service. In most courses/seminars about leadership, surveyed people consistently believe that honesty, integrity, morality are highly valued characteristics of the best leaders. Where does drunk driving fit into all of that? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|