If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
"Kyle Boatright" wrote in message ... What's the narrowest runway you've ever used? 40 feet at http://www.airnav.com/airport/F14 (Wichita Valley Airport at Wichita Falls, Texas). At what runway width are you comfortable? 40 feet wasn't too bad, but I'd hate it in a crosswind....probably go elsewhere. Among other things, I had an interesting experience yesterday with a runway that was far narrower than any I'd used before... On very short final, it became obvious that this strip redefined narrow. Accoring to the AFD, it is 50' wide, but what the AFD didn't say is that 3' tall sagebrush grows right to the edge of the strip, and occasionally cuts into the 50' useful width. Given that 3' sagebrush will hit the RV-6's wingtips, I probably had 10'-12' clear on each side. Catching the sagebrush with a wingtip would have almost certainly caused a groundloop. Brush on the edge would, in your case, definitely be a potential problem The 40 footer at F14 just barely covered my 38' wingspan. When I was there a KingAir was taking off and I had to watch!! :~) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
No doubt in my mind that we tend to fly as well as we have too and don't
realize how much more precise we can be until we have too. Flying gliders with 50 ft wings makes a lot of runways 'interesting'. Landed on at least one where you have to lift a wing to clear the lights (Pocono Stoudsburg N53). The trick is to turn off between the lights before you drop the wing. Too many roadways are unlandable because of reflectors - especially out west in the 'wide open spaces' where it looks like you can land anywhere but can't actually do it anywhere with 50' wings. I've landed on a couple of roads where I had to pick a spot between roadsigns. A number of glider ports have a 3 ft wide hard strip for TO and Landings with the single wheel. Even pre-solo pilots do it. Easier than it seems - you fly as well as you have too. W88 in Greensboro has a longitidinal split of gravel and 20' asphalt. You can land on either but it's strange to straddle it. Could be interesting at night (lol) I've always been impressed with military trained pilots who seem to have been trained to do everything on the centerline. Just paying attention makes it easy. "Kyle Boatright" wrote in message ... What's the narrowest runway you've ever used? At what runway width are you comfortable? Among other things, I had an interesting experience yesterday with a runway that was far narrower than any I'd used before... We had gone to Dallas for Mother's day, and returned to Atlanta yesterday in my RV-6, which is set-up for basic VFR. The weather was marginal for most of the way, and we made two unscheduled stops and a couple of 180 degree course reversals to avoid weather that was below my minimums. This turned a 3.5 hour trip into an 8 hour odyssey. Our first 180 turn and unscheduled stop occurred when the ceiling was lower than forecast, below my personal minimums, and dropping along our route of flight. I hit the "nearest" function on the GPS, and retreated to the nearest airfield to give the FSS a call on the cell phone (we were too low for radio communication). As we overflew the airfield, I noticed that all it was was a paved strip and a paved ramp. No buildings nearby. Also, the strip looked fairly narrow, but I went ahead with the landing anyway. On very short final, it became obvious that this strip redefined narrow. Accoring to the AFD, it is 50' wide, but what the AFD didn't say is that 3' tall sagebrush grows right to the edge of the strip, and occasionally cuts into the 50' useful width. Given that 3' sagebrush will hit the RV-6's wingtips, I probably had 10'-12' clear on each side. Catching the sagebrush with a wingtip would have almost certainly caused a groundloop. With this in mind, and concentrating hard enough to cause permanant forehead wrinkles, I managed to keep the airplane centered on landing and rollout, then taxiied (sp?) to the ramp, where I shut down, pulled out the cell phone and got exactly zero signal... (Sometimes you can't win.) So, we fired up again, taxiied out, and I kept the bird out of the weeds on takeoff and off we went. In the 30 minutes our detour consumed, the weather along the route improved meaningfully, and we made another 225 miles before the next unplanned stop. After a 3 hour wait and a couple of visits with the on-field FSS at Greenville, MS, we found a safe path around the line of storms on the Alabama/Mississippi border and came on home. One of the real advantages to a relatively high performance airplane is that if the weather allows, you can get above most of the cumulus and eyeball your way around the convective stuff. I'm not sure we would have gotten around yesterday's weather in a C-172 or Cherokee... |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
"Kyle Boatright" wrote in message
... What's the narrowest runway you've ever used? At what runway width are you comfortable? Phoenix Regional (A39) @ 4000 x 50 Jay Beckman PP-ASEL Chandler, AZ |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
"Kyle Boatright" wrote in message
... What's the narrowest runway you've ever used? At what runway width are you comfortable? Well, let's see. There are several 30' and under wide runways in the Puget Sound area, almost all of which I use on a semi-regular basis, and have landed on at least once. The narrowest is 24'. It doesn't seem uncomfortable to me at all. I may have even landed on narrower somewhere, but if so I don't recall. In my seaplane, probably the landings with the least margin for lateral error have been in canals in Florida. I don't actually know how wide they are, but if you stay in the center, you're fine. As with the runway you describe, it's not so much the width of the landing surface, as it is the width of the area the wings must clear. My plane has a 40' wingspan, so the canals must be wider than that. In any case, 10' on each side sounds like a LOT of room to me. However, I will readily grant that comfort depends a lot on pilot experience and confidence. Even so, I'll point out that when my primary instructor got fed up with me landing all over the place on Boeing Field's 200' wide runway, he fixed that by taking me over to Port Orchard with their 28' wide runway and demonstrating that, when necessary, I had no trouble staying on the centerline. I was no longer permitted to claim "but it's too hard" back at Boeing. Pete |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
What's the narrowest runway you've ever used? http://www.airnav.com/airport/L53 Lodi Airpark near Sacramento, CA has an 1875x22ft. runway. If I remember right there's a ditch on the side too - leaving little room for error. Also, Harris Ranch (also in CA) has a 30ft. runway which can be really challenging because in summer afternoons the wind tends to gust straight across the runway. http://www.airnav.com/airport/3O8 - Ray |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
In article ,
"Kyle Boatright" wrote: What's the narrowest runway you've ever used? At what runway width are you comfortable? IIRC Tew-Mac in MA was 26' wide, and it was fine. My CFII was tired of me landing left of centerline at KBED (150' wide) so he took me to Tew-Mac. He proved to me that I can land on the centerline and I proved to him that I can land on the centerline when I want to. :-) -- Bob Noel no one likes an educated mule |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
I remember that narrow runway at Tew-Mac... but when my CFI took me there he
said it was 21ft... There is also a runway in NW Abilene TX.. that must have been about 30ft wide.. BT "Bob Noel" wrote in message ... In article , "Kyle Boatright" wrote: What's the narrowest runway you've ever used? At what runway width are you comfortable? IIRC Tew-Mac in MA was 26' wide, and it was fine. My CFII was tired of me landing left of centerline at KBED (150' wide) so he took me to Tew-Mac. He proved to me that I can land on the centerline and I proved to him that I can land on the centerline when I want to. :-) -- Bob Noel no one likes an educated mule |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Kyle Boatright wrote:
What's the narrowest runway you've ever used? At what runway width are you comfortable? Among other things, I had an interesting experience yesterday with a runway that was far narrower than any I'd used before... I think 35' was the narrowest. My comfort level depends on the wind, etc. In calm conditions, I'd be comfortable with 10'. In a stiff cross wind, I like at least 50'. We had gone to Dallas for Mother's day, and returned to Atlanta yesterday in my RV-6, which is set-up for basic VFR. The weather was marginal for most of the way, and we made two unscheduled stops and a couple of 180 degree course reversals to avoid weather that was below my minimums. This turned a 3.5 hour trip into an 8 hour odyssey. Our first 180 turn and unscheduled stop occurred when the ceiling was lower than forecast, below my personal minimums, and dropping along our route of flight. I hit the "nearest" function on the GPS, and retreated to the nearest airfield to give the FSS a call on the cell phone (we were too low for radio communication). As we overflew the airfield, I noticed that all it was was a paved strip and a paved ramp. No buildings nearby. Also, the strip looked fairly narrow, but I went ahead with the landing anyway. On very short final, it became obvious that this strip redefined narrow. Accoring to the AFD, it is 50' wide, but what the AFD didn't say is that 3' tall sagebrush grows right to the edge of the strip, and occasionally cuts into the 50' useful width. Given that 3' sagebrush will hit the RV-6's wingtips, I probably had 10'-12' clear on each side. Catching the sagebrush with a wingtip would have almost certainly caused a groundloop. Another good reason to fly a Cessna. :-) We have the same problem with snow windrows here in the winter. Matt |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
I think 35' was the narrowest. My comfort level depends on the wind, etc.
In calm conditions, I'd be comfortable with 10'. Methinks you exaggerate a tad? :-) What's the wheelbase of your plane? -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
"Jay Honeck" wrote in message news:cvmge.70892$r53.23190@attbi_s21... I think 35' was the narrowest. My comfort level depends on the wind, etc. In calm conditions, I'd be comfortable with 10'. Methinks you exaggerate a tad? :-) What's the wheelbase of your plane? Me agrees! The wheel span of mine is (I think) 11' 4". |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Narrow Foil Strips for Ground Plane | Dennis Mountains | Home Built | 22 | August 29th 04 01:09 AM |
Winds on long runways | Casey Wilson | Piloting | 15 | July 17th 04 08:35 AM |
Cylinder Wrenches for 0-320A Narrow Deck | DAVE | Home Built | 1 | December 31st 03 01:45 PM |
Extreme Runways | JohnMcGrew | Piloting | 9 | October 25th 03 02:57 PM |
fs2002 - increase intensity taxiway and runways' lights? | Mark Cherry | Simulators | 0 | September 23rd 03 01:08 AM |