If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Glass cockpit hard to read
To all:
Please be aware the Anthony Atkielski (mxsmanic) is not a pilot, and has never held an aviation medical. In fact he has never even taken a lesson, let alone fly in a small plane. He certainly has never flown with or operated a G-1000 or anything remotely similar. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Glass cockpit hard to read
To all:
Please be aware the Anthony Atkielski (mxsmanic) is not a pilot, and has never held an aviation medical. In fact he has never even taken a lesson, let alone fly in a small plane. He certainly has never flown with or operated a G-1000 or anything remotely similar. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Glass cockpit hard to read
"Bertie the Bunyip" wrote: An analogue display cuts the left hand side out of the loop and enables the calcualtion rate to increase the right sides "frame rate" so that corrections can be made more frequently thus enabling the pilot to fly the airplane more smooothly and with more authority. Caorse rule of thumb math can be laid over this for descent angles, interceptin angles and wo on, but generally, the fewer numbers involved, the better. People who prefer the numbers usualy don't fly very well at all. Bless you, my boy. I thought the reason I hated the tapes was that I'm just an old fogie. Now I know it's because I'm a natural! Most gratifying news. -- Dan T-182T at BFM |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Glass cockpit hard to read
"Dan Luke" wrote in
: "Bertie the Bunyip" wrote: An analogue display cuts the left hand side out of the loop and enables the calcualtion rate to increase the right sides "frame rate" so that corrections can be made more frequently thus enabling the pilot to fly the airplane more smooothly and with more authority. Caorse rule of thumb math can be laid over this for descent angles, interceptin angles and wo on, but generally, the fewer numbers involved, the better. People who prefer the numbers usualy don't fly very well at all. Bless you, my boy. I thought the reason I hated the tapes was that I'm just an old fogie. Now I know it's because I'm a natural! 'xactly. 've had a speed tape in front of me for years now and I still look right past it to the ASI. It does have a useful function in that it flashes if I get more than a few knots away from bug speed whilst hand flying, but intuitive use of the ASI needle is al I have found I'd ever need. Most gratifying news. That's why the name Berite the Bunyip is a byword for service. Bertie |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Glass cockpit hard to read
On Oct 6, 2:35 pm, Arno wrote:
Dean, I just noticed something interesting, looking at pictures of recent Boeing and Airbus PFDs. For altitude, they are both pretty much the same, but for the speed tape, Airbus does not have a big number at the center of the tape but instead the number on top of the tape and just a thin line at the center. After my experience today I like the Airbus better because it is less conducive to reading the numbers rather than "get the picture": Airbus A340: http://simflight.nl/users/reviews/CL...nshots/PFD.jpg Boeing 777: http://www.meriweather.com/777/fwd/pfd.html Arno Take a look at the speed tape on the 777. The tape itself gives you the course rate of change, while the window gives you the fine resolution changes with the 1's place on the airspace as a sliding digit. The Airbus doesn't give you that. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Glass cockpit hard to read
Bertie the Bunyip writes:
Flying is a right hand brain activity. At least the handling portion is. The right hand side of the brain dosn't do abstractions like numbers, at least not until the left hand side (which can't fly worth a ****) sends it over to the right side in a readily digestable form which enables the right brain to chew it into a picture. An analogue display cuts the left hand side out of the loop and enables the calcualtion rate to increase the right sides "frame rate" so that corrections can be made more frequently thus enabling the pilot to fly the airplane more smooothly and with more authority. Most of this is pure speculation, although it is interesting. People who prefer the numbers usualy don't fly very well at all. Unless, of course, they are flying an airliner in which systems are more important than hand-flying. In that case, they may be a lot better at it. You don't do trig while you're shooting pool and expect to win the game. Some people do (cf. card counters). |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Glass cockpit hard to read
|
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Glass cockpit hard to read
Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
john smith wrote in : In article , Bertie the Bunyip wrote: You don't do trig while you're shooting pool and expect to win the game. You're right, I do geometry. :-)) Nobody can do geometry properly with the required alchohol load to play pool properly I consider it well played if I manage to hit the cue ball with the cue stick. And that's sometimes with no alcohol load. I then pray (a dubious thing for an atheist to do) for fortuitous stochastic scattering to align with my prediction. |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Glass cockpit hard to read
On Oct 6, 6:10 pm, wrote:
On Oct 6, 2:35 pm, Arno wrote: Dean, I just noticed something interesting, looking at pictures of recent Boeing and Airbus PFDs. For altitude, they are both pretty much the same, but for the speed tape, Airbus does not have a big number at the center of the tape but instead the number on top of the tape and just a thin line at the center. After my experience today I like the Airbus better because it is less conducive to reading the numbers rather than "get the picture": Airbus A340: http://simflight.nl/users/reviews/CL...nshots/PFD.jpg Boeing 777: http://www.meriweather.com/777/fwd/pfd.html Arno Take a look at the speed tape on the 777. The tape itself gives you the course rate of change, while the window gives you the fine resolution changes with the 1's place on the airspace as a sliding digit. The Airbus doesn't give you that.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Oops, typo, make that "coarse rate of change" |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Glass cockpit hard to read
Mxsmanic wrote in
: Bertie the Bunyip writes: Flying is a right hand brain activity. At least the handling portion is. The right hand side of the brain dosn't do abstractions like numbers, at least not until the left hand side (which can't fly worth a ****) sends it over to the right side in a readily digestable form which enables the right brain to chew it into a picture. An analogue display cuts the left hand side out of the loop and enables the calcualtion rate to increase the right sides "frame rate" so that corrections can be made more frequently thus enabling the pilot to fly the airplane more smooothly and with more authority. Most of this is pure speculation, although it is interesting. No it isn't. I do it, you don;t People who prefer the numbers usualy don't fly very well at all. Unless, of course, they are flying an airliner in which systems are more important than hand-flying. In that case, they may be a lot better at it. It was an airliner I was talking about Fjukktard. I You don't do trig while you're shooting pool and expect to win the game. Some people do (cf. card counters). Card counters use trig to play pool , do they? You are the dumbest fjukkwit I've ever seen. Bertie |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
OSH Homerun? Glass Cockpit for the Budget-Challenged | Marco Leon | Piloting | 4 | July 27th 07 11:27 PM |
winter is hard. | Bruce Greef | Soaring | 2 | July 3rd 06 06:31 AM |
Why Not Use PC To Make Glass Cockpit? | Le Chaud Lapin | Instrument Flight Rules | 52 | July 19th 05 03:45 AM |
It ain't that hard | Gregg Ballou | Soaring | 8 | March 23rd 05 01:18 AM |
Glass Cockpit in Older Planes | Charles Talleyrand | Owning | 2 | May 20th 04 01:20 AM |