If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
"JohnH" wrote in message et... Paul Lynch wrote: Apples and oranges, supported by unsupportable numbers. "Ephraim" wrote in message om... Can anyone tell me how safety statistics for soaring compares with statistics for driving automobiles? Thanks in advance, --Ephraim I would like to know, you know, for the next time someone rolls their eyes upward when I tell them I'm taking soaring lessons :-) john orlando, fl The only statistics that made any sense at all to me was that there is a general statistical risk of accidental death of any type and that soaring is safer than this general risk. Therefore, compared to other activities, though it may seem higher than some that you participate in, liking driving to the glider field, it likely does not increase your overall risk much. That being said, a quick visit to www.ntsb.gov is in order. Go to Aviation, databases, and filter on gliders for this year. So, a crash landing in the trees may be safer than trying to land in a narrow patch between trees? Crash landing in cold water is preferable to landing on rocks? (BTW, a young boy drowned due to hypothermia trying to swim across the same reservoir the following week). Rock polishing may be very dangerous, as there were at least two perfectly landable fields 800ft below the impact point in Morgan City, Utah (I've seen a photo). These are relative judgement issues and our collective experience set is too small to say what the right or wrong decision might be in some cases. The environmental implications cannot be ignored, but are only a factor in making the decision to fly, press on, etc. We can always take the decision to err on the side of caution and live to fly another day. Gaining the wisdom to make that decision is highly individual...... Among the cross country experienced soaring pilots, there's not a one that hasn't had a chance to get wiser and older. A factor I find more disturbing when combing through these records over the years is that there is a much higher incidence of hardware failure or compromise than I would have expected and have heard about in passing hangar talk. This is beyond the rigging and latching errors. The first large government agency that I worked for had a very strict rule regarding moving accidents, and that is, that all are preventable. But you must strive for this sort of perfection. Mentoring, cross-country camps, task weeks, and lead and follow flying are all excellent ways to improve the skills and judgement required to experience soaring safely beyond the local area. In some soaring organizations, it's built into the process through a tiered, value added process of inculcating members and promoting their opportunities. In others, it's an add-on process. IMVHO, one is more effective than the other, but both have their place. Frank Whiteley |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Parachute fails to save SR-22 | Capt.Doug | Piloting | 72 | February 10th 05 05:14 AM |
The Internet public meeting on National Air Tour Standards begins Feb. 23 at 9 a.m. | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 0 | February 22nd 04 03:58 PM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |
FAR:Safety Pilot & High Performance/Complex? | Jim | General Aviation | 51 | August 18th 03 03:08 PM |
FAR:Safety Pilot & High Performance/Complex? | Jim | Piloting | 10 | August 13th 03 08:51 PM |