If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
A thought & question on simulators
During my instrument training (early 90s) I spent a lot of time in a simulator. It was not a new, modern simulator, but it did the job. I remember going out to the C-172 for instrument training and thinking how glad I was that I wasn't in the sim today. The plane was like a breath of relief. Flying the sim was hard, I remember it being more difficult than the airplane. Induced failures were frequent, things happened faster, and the sim was not nearly as forgiving as the airplane. I have never flown a MS simulator but I do wonder if the thing has the same level of difficulty that a non-motion sim from the early 90s may have had? The MS sim I speak of would have a basic lightplane setup with pedals, yoke, throttle, radios, etc, in other words; as close to a light plane as is possible in MS. It would also mean the MS sim is flown as a pilot would be doing in gaining hours & instruction or recurrency toward his/her instrument rating. This post is meant for those instrument rated pilots who've flown MS and a real sim, too, not Anthony. Ricky |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
A thought on BRS | Martin Gregorie | Soaring | 47 | April 29th 04 06:34 AM |
Another question about simulators | James Blakely | Instrument Flight Rules | 1 | July 25th 03 03:31 PM |