If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#101
|
|||
|
|||
Recently, Greg Farris posted:
says... [...] And, you want to have one guy managing more than one flight? Well, yeah! Even thought of a name for it. I'll call it ATC. A savvy mix of human and computer technology, watching over departure, en-route and arrival of several planes at once. Science fiction, I know, but it could work, if you give it a chance! I'm sorry, but ATC does *not* "control airplanes", they are *never* the PIC. Perhaps you're not involved in aviation, or understand how the system is organized... ;-) At the very least, this is not likely to improve the loss rate, which would more than offset the cost of the pilot's salary. Add to that the expense of maintaining the requisite systems, and it's easy to see that the cost of operation would be higher, not lower than today. How much will an A&P with a computer science degree cost? I don't think the impetus of the thread was really to reduce costs - or at least not exclusively. The airlines have found many ways to reduce pilot costs!! I think the thread (which I did not initiate, and which I did not even agree with) was as much about reducing human error as anything else. Well, you "jumped into" this thread at my response to Peter Duniho, who cited overall loss rate and cost of operations as two motivating considerations for airlines. Your scheme accomplishes neither of those objectives. In short, *I* won't be flying on any airliner where the pilot is not on board. Neither will I! I've said from the get-go that I didnt think it was a good idea. I just don't share your view about the technical complexity of it. I think about 85% of it is in place already, and the remainder is not much more complicated. Some challenges - sure. Nothing space-age though. I think you underestimate the diificulty of those challenges. It's far beyond "space-age" in the present-day sense. Consider the Mars rovers, which are piloted remotely. They basically follow relatively short instruction sets for relatively short distances, and even then they get into trouble because they are in a dynamic environment, albeit 2D. Airliners require much larger instruction sets over a much longer period and travelling over much greater distances in a 3D dynamic environment. It just won't happen without decent AI, and it certainly won't be cheap to maintain. Neil |
#102
|
|||
|
|||
Recently, Chris Colohan posted:
[...] So, you are left with two choices: 1. Try to design a communication system which is so robust that communication failure is virtually impossible; or 2. Include some sort of autonomous system as a backup for when communication fails. Do I think this is impossible? No. Do I think it is quite hard to get right? Yes. It certainly will take quite some time to get this right enough to win the trust of the average passenger. I completely agree, but as I wrote earlier, by the time this idea is even a remote possibility, we'll have all kinds of autonomous machines running around us, and we'll take it in stride. Neil |
#103
|
|||
|
|||
Neil Gould wrote: Recently, Chris Colohan posted: [...] So, you are left with two choices: 1. Try to design a communication system which is so robust that communication failure is virtually impossible; or 2. Include some sort of autonomous system as a backup for when communication fails. Do I think this is impossible? No. Do I think it is quite hard to get right? Yes. It certainly will take quite some time to get this right enough to win the trust of the average passenger. I completely agree, but as I wrote earlier, by the time this idea is even a remote possibility, we'll have all kinds of autonomous machines running around us, and we'll take it in stride. I see that they ran the 'robot/remote controlled ground vehicle trials again and some actually completed the course. If they're that unreliable on the ground where you can stop and rectify faults I don't think the possibility of pilots being removed from the cockpit is going to arise... |
#104
|
|||
|
|||
Bob Fry wrote:
Not my statement. See http://www.longbets.org/4 What sayeth the group wisdom? I think eventually there will be pilotless aircraft, the question is when. Does anyone know when it was that Dr. Charles Stark Draper, the inventor of inertial navigation, flew coast to coast on a "computer-controlled" airplane? I believe it was in the '50s. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Power Commercial to Glider Commercial | Mitty | Soaring | 24 | March 15th 05 03:41 PM |
Do You Want to Become a Commercial Helicopter Pilot? | Badwater Bill | Rotorcraft | 7 | August 22nd 04 12:00 AM |
What to study for commercial written exam? | Dave | Piloting | 0 | August 9th 04 03:56 PM |
Another Addition to the Rec.Aviation Rogue's Gallery! | Jay Honeck | Home Built | 125 | February 1st 04 05:57 AM |
Another Addition to the Rec.Aviation Rogue's Gallery! | Jay Honeck | Piloting | 129 | February 1st 04 05:57 AM |