If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
TRAFFIC ALERT! TRAFFIC ALERT!
....Skyhawk XXX. Traffic is 12 o'clock, two miles, altitude 7600, closing.
Recommend turn left 30 degrees immediately." My buddy (we'll call him CJ) rolled into a hard left bank and added some down-push to the yoke when a glance at the altimeter told him he was at 7,500. "XXX, traffic now one mile." With the wing rolled up about 60 degrees, CJ saw the opposing traffic go by at 2, then 3, then 4 o'clock. Separation then was probably 1/2 mile or more. He could only identify the other aircraft as a high wing single, tannish in color, make unknown. He keyed the mike and said, "Joshua, XXX, traffic in sight, no factor." "Roger, XXX, resume normal navigation, maintain VFR." "Roger, resume normal navigation, XXX. Thanks for the head-up," CJ replied as he added throttle to regain the 400 feet he'd lost and turned back toward the east to recapture the 358-degree course line on his yoke-mounted GPS. Leveling off at 7,500, CJ contemplated calling Joshua Control and asking if they had the tail number of that yahoo he'd done the aerial dance with. Then came the epiphany. There it was, right in front of him. The altimeter was nailed at 7,500 and the DI was right on the bug set at 358. CJ was the yahoo. If you've ever flown along the east side of the Sierra Nevada, you know the Owens Valley squeezes down to a narrow route with 12,000 to 14,000 ridges to the west and the 10,000 to 14,000 White Mountain range to the east. Down near Owen's Lake, R-2505 owned by the Naval Air Warfare Center at China Lake makes the east side even closer. It is not uncommon for horizontal separation to be less than a mile. Flying northbound out of IYK (Inyokern, CA) to BIS (Bishop, CA), CJ had been initially tracking 005-degrees. When he rounded a high terrain feature, he jinked left to head to BIS direct. By then he'd dialed in the elevator trim for practically hands-off level flight. The winds were dead calm except for the usual rivers of air flowing out of the deeper canyons causing some negligible burbles. The nearest cloud was somewhere out of sight and the boundary between sky and mountains looked like it had been carved with a razor blade. I'm not trying to excuse CJ's lack of attention to details and the fact that his course change required a corresponding change of altitude. He blew it. The incident took all the fun out of the flight and after doing a 180 course reversal, CJ took the airplane back to IYK and parked it for two weeks. The day after the incident he sent an ASRS form in to report his dumb mistake with the hope that it will help in the future. Things could have been bad on that Tuesday morning except for an alert ATC at Joshua Approach and the fact that CJ always requests flight following. Oh, one last thing, CJ did descend to a lower when he crossed the jink-point on the way home. Go Fly! Casey Wilson Freelance Writer and Photographer |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
TRAFFIC ALERT! TRAFFIC ALERT!
There it was, right in front of him. The altimeter
was nailed at 7,500 and the DI was right on the bug set at 358. CJ was the yahoo. CJ should not be so hard on himself. The line between even+ and odd+ may be an exact mathematical number, but nobody can fly that exactly, and even if they could, there would be people flying 358 at the same altitude as people flying 181. It's a fact of life. And all it takes is a slight crosswind for the 181 degree aircraft to need to fly 177 to maintain course, and then 181 again. There is going to be some overlap. This doesn't even count the folks descending or climbing through an altitude. The hemisphere rule is intended to get "most" folks out of the way of "most other" folks, "most of the time". I do not consider those who are on the edge of the hemisphere to be yahoos, whether they be even+ or odd+. That's what eyeballs are for. Jose -- The monkey turns the crank and thinks he's making the music. for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
TRAFFIC ALERT! TRAFFIC ALERT!
On Sun, 25 Jun 2006 11:53:21 GMT, Jose
wrote: There it was, right in front of him. The altimeter was nailed at 7,500 and the DI was right on the bug set at 358. CJ was the yahoo. CJ should not be so hard on himself. The line between even+ and odd+ may be an exact mathematical number, but nobody can fly that exactly, and even if they could, there would be people flying 358 at the same altitude as people flying 181. It's a fact of life. And all it takes is a slight crosswind for the 181 degree aircraft to need to fly 177 to maintain course, and then 181 again. I thought the hemispherical rules were based on magnetic course, not heading? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
TRAFFIC ALERT! TRAFFIC ALERT!
"Jose" wrote in message
. com... And all it takes is a slight crosswind for the 181 degree aircraft to need to fly 177 to maintain course, and then 181 again. True, but as long as the course is being maintained, the corresponding altitude doesn't change (the hemisphere rule applies to course, not heading). I agree with your larger point that (even aside from climbs and descents) the hemisphere rule doesn't prevent near-head-on flight in the vicinity of 180 or 360 degree courses. For that reason, when VFR, I prefer to avoid such courses if feasible; instead, I plot a course that zig-zags about ten degrees away from the borderline direction. If nothing else, traffic is a bit more conspicuous when its orientation is oblique so that the fuselage profile becomes visible. --Gary |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
TRAFFIC ALERT! TRAFFIC ALERT!
"Jose" wrote in message . com... And all it takes is a slight crosswind for the 181 degree aircraft to need to fly 177 to maintain course, and then 181 again. The hemispheric rule is based on the course, not the heading needed to hold it. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
TRAFFIC ALERT! TRAFFIC ALERT!
The hemispheric rule is based on the course, not the heading needed to hold
it. Yes, I thought so, but I wanted to respond in the context, rather than challenge the context. Some pilots do choose based on heading, and if you have no charted course (as in "let's go sightsee") heading becomes a stand-in. Something else to watch out for. Jose -- The monkey turns the crank and thinks he's making the music. for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
TRAFFIC ALERT! TRAFFIC ALERT!
Casey Wilson N2310D @gmail.com wrote:
I'm not trying to excuse CJ's lack of attention to details and the fact that his course change required a corresponding change of altitude. He blew it. The incident took all the fun out of the flight and after doing a 180 course reversal, CJ took the airplane back to IYK and parked it for two weeks. As I am not familiar with the area, what was the ground elevation at that point? Was "CJ" above 3,000 feet above the ground or below it? As you know, odd/even cruise altitudes are required above 3,000 feet AGL. Also, there are many other, more common and legitimate opportunities to bump into aircraft. One or both could be climbing up to a cruise altitude, descending to an airport or an interim altitude, or any permutation thereof. -- Peter |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
TRAFFIC ALERT! TRAFFIC ALERT!
"Casey Wilson" N2310D @ gmail.com wrote in message news:twung.1224$Gh.204@trnddc02... ...snip Leveling off at 7,500, CJ contemplated calling Joshua Control and asking if they had the tail number of that yahoo he'd done the aerial dance with. How/why would CJ want the other aircraft's tail number? snip Go Fly! Casey Wilson Freelance Writer and Photographer |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
TRAFFIC ALERT! TRAFFIC ALERT!
On Sun, 25 Jun 2006 11:33:45 GMT, "Casey Wilson" N2310D @ gmail.com
wrote: ...Skyhawk XXX. Traffic is 12 o'clock, two miles, altitude 7600, closing. Recommend turn left 30 degrees immediately." A few weeks ago I was flying out of my base airport on a short cross country flight. As I climbed out of runway 23 the controller told me to make a "structured" right downwind and to maintain 1000'. The word "structured" threw me for a second. I had never heard that term used before. But I assumed he meant to fly a standard closed circuit which I did. I established myself on the downwind and nailed it at 1000' because the controller had traffic at 1500'. All is good until I get down to the arrival end of the runway abeam the numbers. Then out of the corner of my eye, in a split second a Cessna passed directly under me about ten degrees off the nose. I believe he was less than 100' below me. I never thought about it again and proceeded with the flight. But I begin to wonder about it the next day. The day before I took this aformentioned flight I had schedlued a visit to the control tower for the next weekend. So when I went for the visit I mentioned the incident the controller. It happened to be the same guy that was working me the previous weekend. He remembered the particular aircraft in question and said that they in the contrl tower were taken completely by surprise by that Cessna driver. We talked about it for a little while and moved on to other topics. (As a side note I told him that the word "structured" confused me for a second. He said that it was something he had used as a military controller and that it might be best to rethink his use of it now.) The reason I mention this close encounter is that I have always been hesitant about how well I can spot aircraft at a distance. I felt that I should have seen this guy at least a few miles out but never did. Depending on the sun angles, the haze, the background clutter etc., I am not completely confident yet on my ability to be able to immediately spot an aircraft 3 or 5 miles out. And in this case I never saw him until he was right under me. Is it resaonble to expect that Casey or the other pilot should have been able to see each other 3, 4 or 5 miles out? Or do you have to have the infamous eyesight of Chuck Yeager. For the average GA pilot what would be the expected level of visual acuity? When conditions are right I can see aircraft 3 to 4 miles out but when the controllers report traffic that far out it can take me some time to spot it. Sometimes I never can because of the conditions. Usually it takes the lightreflecting off the aircraft just rightfor me to see it. Does the ability to spot other aircraft improve with experience? Kirk |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
TRAFFIC ALERT! TRAFFIC ALERT!
The reason I mention this close encounter is that I have always been
hesitant about how well I can spot aircraft at a distance. I felt that I should have seen this guy at least a few miles out but never did. Depending on the sun angles, the haze, the background clutter etc., I am not completely confident yet on my ability to be able to immediately spot an aircraft 3 or 5 miles out. And in this case I never saw him until he was right under me. It's not so much being able to =see= him, as being able to =notice= him. I can see traffic many miles away, once I notice it. Sometimes however I have to notice it again before I can see it again. Motion, a glint of sun, a good silhouette against a cloud, these things help. Does the ability to spot other aircraft improve with experience? Yes, some. However, it will probably never be excellent. The field of good vision is narrow, and the eye doesn't actually send an image to the brain, it pre-processes it. Different parts of the retina (different areas of view) are pre-processed differently. There's a lot of sky to scan. Lots of experienced pilots, myself included, miss lots of targets that are called out. That's why four eyes are better than two. Jose -- The monkey turns the crank and thinks he's making the music. for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Air Force One Had to Intercept Some Inadvertent Flyers / How? | Rick Umali | Piloting | 29 | February 15th 06 04:40 AM |
terminology questions: turtledeck? cantilever wing? | Ric | Home Built | 2 | September 13th 05 09:39 PM |
Nearly had my life terminated today | Michelle P | Piloting | 11 | September 3rd 05 02:37 AM |
Washington DC airspace closing for good? | tony roberts | Piloting | 153 | August 11th 05 12:56 AM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |