If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
This is one of those threads that has taken on a misbegotten life of it's
on! Here's an excerpt of one of my previous posts that (I think) provides the correct answer to the original question on this thread: The purpose of the "R" is to denote airports that have ASR where there would be no other indication to a pilot that it existed. Hopefully this will end it and we can move on to other fun stuff! "Hamish Reid" wrote in message ... In article , "Bill Denton" wrote: My apologies if I unduly credited you. Actually, TRSA's were first mentioned in the second message on this thread. I simply felt your message was the first to directly address TRSA's, as opposed to simply referencing them. In the body of your message, you stated: "TRSAs are a lot rarer than ASRs". However, as has been noted, The Chicago Sectional shows one ASR and three TRSA's, which would contradict your observation. I'm not sure I follow -- there are (probably) ASRs at (or for) all the Class C and B airports on the Chicago sectional, as for (say) the SF sectional. In the case I was thinking of, there's exactly one TRSA in California, but maybe half a dozen ASRs in the combined San Francisco Bay Area / Sacramento area alone (and, from memory, a similar number in the LA area). Only a few of these are marked on the sectional explictly, whereas a TRSA would always be explictly marked. The fact that the sectional only explicitly notes that an airport has an associated ASR when that can't be inferred from other information doesn't mean the ASRs aren't there... Hamish |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
"Bill Denton" wrote in message ... Here's an excerpt of one of my previous posts that (I think) provides the correct answer to the original question on this thread: The purpose of the "R" is to denote airports that have ASR where there would be no other indication to a pilot that it existed. Hopefully this will end it and we can move on to other fun stuff! The correct answer was posted three days ago. |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
The correct answer was posted three days ago.
The incorrect answer was also postd three days ago. (sorry, couldn't resist.) Jose (you know the one about the pilot who's lost somewhere around Redmond....) -- (for Email, make the obvious changes in my address) |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
In article ,
"Bill Denton" wrote: This is one of those threads that has taken on a misbegotten life of it's on! Here's an excerpt of one of my previous posts that (I think) provides the correct answer to the original question on this thread: The purpose of the "R" is to denote airports that have ASR where there would be no other indication to a pilot that it existed. I don't think anyone is contradicting this. But it's hardly the subject of many of the articles you've been responding directly to. Hopefully this will end it and we can move on to other fun stuff! I guess I still don't follow... I made the mild claim that TRSAs seem to be a lot rarer than ASRs (and else-thread pointed out that the entire West Coast region seems to have only one or two TRSAs vs several dozen ASRs at least). In article you objected to this and said that because the Chicago sectional shows one ASR and three TRSAs, this would contradict my observation. But the Chicago sectional depicts quite a lot more than one ASR, and in some other parts of the country the ASR/TRSA ratio is even greater. So basically, it seems that TRSAs are relatively rare compared to ASRs. So I don't understand your objection. Hamish |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
"Hamish Reid" wrote in message ... I guess I still don't follow... I made the mild claim that TRSAs seem to be a lot rarer than ASRs (and else-thread pointed out that the entire West Coast region seems to have only one or two TRSAs vs several dozen ASRs at least). In article you objected to this and said that because the Chicago sectional shows one ASR and three TRSAs, this would contradict my observation. But the Chicago sectional depicts quite a lot more than one ASR, and in some other parts of the country the ASR/TRSA ratio is even greater. basically, it seems that TRSAs are relatively rare compared to ASRs. So I don't understand your objection. TRSAs are relatively rare compared to Class B or Class C airspace areas. Every TRSA has ASR. |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
In article . net,
"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote: "Hamish Reid" wrote in message ... I guess I still don't follow... I made the mild claim that TRSAs seem to be a lot rarer than ASRs (and else-thread pointed out that the entire West Coast region seems to have only one or two TRSAs vs several dozen ASRs at least). In article you objected to this and said that because the Chicago sectional shows one ASR and three TRSAs, this would contradict my observation. But the Chicago sectional depicts quite a lot more than one ASR, and in some other parts of the country the ASR/TRSA ratio is even greater. basically, it seems that TRSAs are relatively rare compared to ASRs. So I don't understand your objection. TRSAs are relatively rare compared to Class B or Class C airspace areas. Every TRSA has ASR. D'Oh! Of course... So does anyone know if there's a US-wide list of TRSAs anywhere? Googling around brought me lots of info on individual TRSAs and the definition of a TRSA (and a thing called the Tom's River Soccer Association), but no obvious list. Hamish |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
"Hamish Reid" wrote in message ... So does anyone know if there's a US-wide list of TRSAs anywhere? I searched for such a list rather extensively a couple of years ago. I couldn't find one. |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message
.net... "Hamish Reid" wrote in message ... So does anyone know if there's a US-wide list of TRSAs anywhere? I searched for such a list rather extensively a couple of years ago. I couldn't find one. There was one but I think it went away when the FAA moved to the ICAO airspace definitions. TRSAs don't fit into that. |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote: "Jeff Saylor" wrote in message ... The R in a circle symbol next to an airport on Sectionals nindicates that this airport has Airport Surveillance Radar. But what does this really indicate to the VFR pilot? At Reading, Pennsylvania (KRDG) there is such a symbol. This (Class D Airspace) airport has its own Approach control (shared position in the tower, actually). Unfortunately at no place on the Sectional is a frequency for approach given, even on the tables next to the chart. At Nantucket, Mass. (KACK) there is such a symbol. This (Class D Airspace) airport does not have approach control. Radar services are provided by Cape Approach during the day and Boston Center during the night. (Active times are not given, but there are boxes on the map itself that indicate what frequency to use for Cape Approach). Stewart Intl, NY (KSWF) also has such a symbol. Radar services are provided by New York TRACON. (all of these airports are on the NY Sectional). So what does this symbol really mean? At one airport where it is used, the airport has a hidden-from-the-chart approach frequency. (The frequency is of course available in the Airport/Facility Directory and IIRC via ATIS among other places). At other airports, radar services are provided by facilities that also provide service to many other airports (without the R symbol.) The only thing that I can think of is that it indicates there is a radar (ASR) antenna on the field for a class D facility. Then again, Class D airspace airport KMDT (Harrisburg Int'l) has such an antenna (atop the hill nearby), but no such R in a circle icon on the sectional. It does however had a surrounding TRSA with a TRACON, so perhaps that is why no R in a circle is necessary. The blue R in a circle symbol is used to indicate the presence of ASR where there is no other indication. It would be superfluous at the core airports in Class B and C airspace and TRSAs. It doesn't matter where the approach control facility is located. Ok, I get that, but what makes this information useful to the pilot? For example, what is available to a pilot landing at Nantucket (Class D, Cape Approach, R-in-circle) that is not available at Vineyard Haven (Martha's Vineyard with Class D, Cape Appraoch, No R-in-circle)? Both airports have a number of approaches, including ILS that controllers can vector pilots to. |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
Hi,
PMJI... Recently, Jeff Saylor posted: "Steven P. McNicoll" wrote: The blue R in a circle symbol is used to indicate the presence of ASR where there is no other indication. It would be superfluous at the core airports in Class B and C airspace and TRSAs. It doesn't matter where the approach control facility is located. Ok, I get that, but what makes this information useful to the pilot? For example, what is available to a pilot landing at Nantucket (Class D, Cape Approach, R-in-circle) that is not available at Vineyard Haven (Martha's Vineyard with Class D, Cape Appraoch, No R-in-circle)? Both airports have a number of approaches, including ILS that controllers can vector pilots to. Steven gave a useful response by stating that "It doesn't matter here the approach control facility is located." All the pilot needs to know is who to talk to. This information is listed in a legend on the back of the chart. ;-) Neil |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
N94 Airport may expand into mobile home community, locals supportive | William Summers | Piloting | 0 | March 18th 04 03:03 AM |
Rules on what can be in a hangar | Brett Justus | Owning | 13 | February 27th 04 05:35 PM |
"I Want To FLY!"-(Youth) My store to raise funds for flying lessons | Curtl33 | General Aviation | 7 | January 9th 04 11:35 PM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |
NACO charts - why have a reference circle? | Bob Gardner | Instrument Flight Rules | 5 | September 6th 03 01:15 PM |