A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Glider Cockpit Safety



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 9th 18, 04:18 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Kevin Christner
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 211
Default Glider Cockpit Safety

I think anyone who has read the "too many deaths" thread has been sobered. When we take to the air, we are accepting a far greater degree of risk than the vast majority every will. We do it because of the personal satisfaction we receive, which makes our lives brighter as a whole.

But I also wonder whether, as a community, we should be applying pressure to manufacturers to focus more on safety, rather than finding that last .01% of performance, in their new glider designs. I've watched a lot of Formula 1 lately, where 200mph+ crashes are a regular occurrence. More often than not, the drivers walk away without a scratch.

What is to prevent glider cockpits from implementing similar safety designs?
  #2  
Old September 9th 18, 04:35 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Auxvache
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 28
Default Glider Cockpit Safety

I have said this for years. But a heavy lift given the scale of our sailplane manufacturers. I suspect complying with new easa g requirements has already required a lot of effort.

But I would buy a little heavier and draggier new glider if it had a cage that meant less certainty of vertebral and ankle fractures with most glider impacts. Stick one human in a downsized two-place fuselage surrounded by whatever cage the F1 guys have, and there would have to be less morbidity, wouldn't there? What does a cage weigh?

I love this sport more than anything, except seeing my family after an awesome flight...
  #3  
Old September 9th 18, 04:55 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
JS[_5_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 624
Default Glider Cockpit Safety

On Sunday, September 9, 2018 at 8:18:45 AM UTC-7, Kevin Christner wrote:
I think anyone who has read the "too many deaths" thread has been sobered.. When we take to the air, we are accepting a far greater degree of risk than the vast majority every will. We do it because of the personal satisfaction we receive, which makes our lives brighter as a whole.

But I also wonder whether, as a community, we should be applying pressure to manufacturers to focus more on safety, rather than finding that last .01% of performance, in their new glider designs. I've watched a lot of Formula 1 lately, where 200mph+ crashes are a regular occurrence. More often than not, the drivers walk away without a scratch.

What is to prevent glider cockpits from implementing similar safety designs?


I've seen some older designs after a serious crash where there wasn't much left of the cockpit. Sometimes there's nothing forward of the bulkhead behind the pilot.
....Gerhard Waibel started responding to your request with the ASW24.
Pilots should also participate in their own safety by avoiding loose stuff or pieces protruding into the cockpit that can either injure or just get in the way of egress. Senna was killed by something loose, even though the F1 roll cage held.
Does any glider manufacturer offering engine/motor options also offer a fire extinguisher option?
The ankle/leg injury solution is a tough one. This problem is still evident in "cab-over" trucks and there's much more money behind them.
Jim
  #4  
Old September 9th 18, 05:04 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 774
Default Glider Cockpit Safety

I've watched a lot of Formula 1 lately, where 200mph+ crashes are a regular occurrence. More often than not, the drivers walk away without a scratch.

What is to prevent glider cockpits from implementing similar safety designs?


The primary factor that imparts superior crashworthiness to F1 and Indy cars is the suspension and wings that are sheared away during impact. As components are peeled off, energy is expended and deceleration happens over a longer period of time. By the time the "tub" surrounding the driver's cockpit is next in line for a pounding, the deceleration that has already taken place reduces the energy imparted to the remaining structure. Additionally, the design of the cockpit has multiple layers of extremely strong carbon fiber and Kevlar formed in such a way that forces are redistributed around the structure and withstand penetration and crushing. The many and regular crashes occurring over the years have provided a wealth of data for the design of each succeeding generation of racing cars. Very little data is collected for the teeny-tiny sailplane market, with only three or four manufactures worldwide.

Modern sailplanes comply with CS-22 crashworthiness standards that spell out minimum requirements for structural rigidity and cockpit penetration. Unfortunately, bringing crashworthiness up to F1 standards would require a cockpit that would be lots heavier and might not help much at all, as the deceleration of the little pink body inside is difficult to control. You can scramble an egg inside the shell.

Perhaps the next generation of composites (graphene, etc.) will allow for more robust structural integrity, but be prepared for a large price increase..
  #5  
Old September 9th 18, 05:26 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Ramy[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 601
Default Glider Cockpit Safety

Ballistic chutes would save more lives then safety cockpit. Too bad that ballistic chutes are not built into every glider. There would be far less fatalities.

Ramy
  #6  
Old September 9th 18, 06:56 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Charlie M. (UH & 002 owner/pilot)
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,383
Default Glider Cockpit Safety

OK, a couple posts by me since I can't do a multi copy on iPad...

Yes, AS started with crashworthy cockpits with the -24. I was shortly on scene to a Discus(?) crash due to hitting low wires on final.
Result......Canadian pilot with broken ankles/lower legs that a -24 "may" have prevented. He still flies.
Later AS ships have similar cockpit protection. Likely part of their marketing today.
I believe other mfr's do similar now.

Many peeps frown on SGS sailplanes, they (the mfr) knew about this maybe 50 years ago?
Sigh.......now it's a big thing?

Sorta peeves me off.

Yes, cockpit structure can help lessen injuries, that, is a good thing,
  #7  
Old September 9th 18, 07:57 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
WB
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 236
Default Glider Cockpit Safety

On Sunday, September 9, 2018 at 12:56:44 PM UTC-5, Charlie M. (UH & 002 owner/pilot) wrote:
OK, a couple posts by me since I can't do a multi copy on iPad...

Yes, AS started with crashworthy cockpits with the -24. I was shortly on scene to a Discus(?) crash due to hitting low wires on final.
Result......Canadian pilot with broken ankles/lower legs that a -24 "may" have prevented. He still flies.
Later AS ships have similar cockpit protection. Likely part of their marketing today.
I believe other mfr's do similar now.

Many peeps frown on SGS sailplanes, they (the mfr) knew about this maybe 50 years ago?
Sigh.......now it's a big thing?

Sorta peeves me off.

Yes, cockpit structure can help lessen injuries, that, is a good thing,


If SGS knew about cockpit protection, then they should have extended that knowledge to energy dissipation in the landing gear of the 2-33. Anyone sitting in the backseat of a 2-33 is sitting right over a very rigid structure that will transmit all the energy of a hard landing right into their back. Saw a 2-33 land hard, dropping in from about 4-6 feet (They were still trying to complete a turn from base to final and were literally dragging the wing on the ground!). The instructor was lifted out of the cockpit and carried away on a backboard.
  #8  
Old September 9th 18, 09:56 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Paul Agnew
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 306
Default Glider Cockpit Safety

Perhaps a first step would be to follow BGA's lead and require cushions to be energy-absorbing foam.

PA
  #9  
Old September 9th 18, 10:22 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Waveguru
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 178
Default Glider Cockpit Safety

The safest thing would be for us all to just fly Condor, eh?

Boggs
  #10  
Old September 9th 18, 10:30 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 32
Default Glider Cockpit Safety

This may be of interest :

https://www.dg-flugzeugbau.de/en/lib...-does-not-sell

Nick.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Glider Safety Webinar Tom[_12_] Soaring 3 January 3rd 12 11:53 PM
Glider Safety Tom[_9_] Soaring 1 March 2nd 10 04:41 PM
Glider Safety Tom[_9_] Soaring 65 March 2nd 10 12:39 AM
Glider Safety, etc. None[_2_] Soaring 3 February 27th 10 04:46 PM
SAFETY TOOLS IN OUR COCKPIT [email protected] Soaring 7 October 17th 08 06:04 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:39 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.