If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
bad vectors, no hand off
On Fri, 09 Feb 2007 04:43:22 GMT, A Lieberma
wrote: Roger wrote in : In Actual: Ahhh... *** approach, this is XXX 20 North at 4,000. How far do you want me to keep going for traffic avoidance? Ahhhh XXX ... turn heading 180 and expect vectors to the ILS. I knew instrument flying required patience, but you exceeded the patience of Job *big smile*. At 3 miles a minute it doesn't take very long and when you are busy 5 or 6 minutes can go by in a hurry. They were really busy and it was hard to get a word in.:-)) At least the ride was smooth even if I couldn't see anything. That was the same day and same airport where they told me to follow the airliner ahead when I couldn't see past the Deb's wing tips. I believe my reply was something to the effect of "I would if I could, but I can't see my own wingtips". Which was followed by another... "Uhhh... when you break out, follow the airliner." :-)) Musta woke the controller up from a nap? I think it certainly woke him up, but not from a nap:-)) Over the years I've had them make just about as many mistakes as I have. On one particular trip I was cleared to land at the wrong airport. So pilots aren't the only ones making that mistake. When I reminded them my flight plan called for the neighboring airport, the usual short pause was followed by a "can you make the runway from your current position?". It was visual and I could. Some one else must have called the tower as they were expecting me and I was well inside where I'd have normally switched for approach to the tower. The one approach (at the other field) handles both fields although they have separate towers. It's a good thing they cleared me for 17 instead of 23 as both airports have a 23 but where I was headed doesn't have a 17. :-)) Actually I was already suspicious as approach was almost taking me over the end of the runway I was expecting to use. Allen Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member) (N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair) www.rogerhalstead.com |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
bad vectors, no hand off
Flew the Commanders in Seattle when I worked for Skycraft up there; flew the
6 in Tulsa when I worked for Bill Christiansen. Both are great aircraft - I wouldn't be surprised if you can take the Commander apart and haul it in the six. I liked the seating in the Commander and the interior roominess better than the 6 - but like someone else pointed out if you could get it in the 6, you could fly it. -- Jim Carter Rogers, Arkansas "Mortimer Schnerd, RN" mschnerdatcarolina.rr.com wrote in message ... Bonehenge wrote: There's always next year. -=8^( And I liked the Six so much more than the Commander. Me too. I've never flown a Commander but I've got a bunch of time flying a Six to some very nice places. Never a 260 though... always a 300. I understand the 260 actually has more useful load... which is already kind of scary. I used to carry 6 adults, baggage, and diving gear (except for tanks and weight belts) from North Carolina to various spots in the Bahamas (with staging in and out of the Vero Beach/ St. Lucie County area). One hell of a load... one hell of a bird. What did the guy who won the AOPA bird fly? C-130's? He's never gonna be satisfied with a Six. Schmuck. -- Mortimer Schnerd, RN mschnerdatcarolina.rr.com |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
bad vectors, no hand off
Jim Carter wrote:
I liked the seating in the Commander and the interior roominess better than the 6 - but like someone else pointed out if you could get it in the 6, you could fly it. So true. I used to use both a C-210 and the Six on my Bahamian runs. The 210 could make it nonstop but it was pretty tight for the folks in the back. It also was tough finding space for all our crap. The Six didn't have the range or the speed, but it definitely had the room. The rear seats were comfortable and the forward baggage compartment made managing an aft CG pretty easy. Six adults, full fuel, baggage and dive gear... we might waddle into the sky but I never worried I wouldn't make it. As many others have said, the limiting factor was whether you could get the doors closed.... -- Mortimer Schnerd, RN mschnerdatcarolina.rr.com |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
bad vectors, no hand off
"Newps" wrote in message
45 days. ....and do they really use tapes? I thought it was all hard drives now. -- John T http://sage1solutions.com/blogs/TknoFlyer Reduce spam. Use Sender Policy Framework: http://openspf.org ____________________ |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
RNAV vectors | Dan Luke | Instrument Flight Rules | 74 | December 26th 06 10:31 PM |
Vectors over water | paul kgyy | Instrument Flight Rules | 22 | May 4th 05 09:15 PM |
Lost Comms While on Vectors for traffic | O. Sami Saydjari | Instrument Flight Rules | 14 | April 26th 05 10:08 PM |
Approach to an LOM/IAF with PT (not vectors to final) | O. Sami Saydjari | Instrument Flight Rules | 35 | April 13th 04 09:54 PM |
Slam dunk into Janesville | Steven P. McNicoll | Piloting | 0 | July 31st 03 01:08 AM |