A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Instrument Flight Rules
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

bad vectors, no hand off



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old February 11th 07, 03:50 AM posted to rec.aviation.ifr
Roger[_4_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 677
Default bad vectors, no hand off

On Fri, 09 Feb 2007 04:43:22 GMT, A Lieberma
wrote:

Roger wrote in
:

In Actual: Ahhh... *** approach, this is XXX 20 North at 4,000. How
far do you want me to keep going for traffic avoidance? Ahhhh XXX ...
turn heading 180 and expect vectors to the ILS.


I knew instrument flying required patience, but you exceeded the patience
of Job *big smile*.


At 3 miles a minute it doesn't take very long and when you are busy 5
or 6 minutes can go by in a hurry.

They were really busy and it was hard to get a word in.:-))
At least the ride was smooth even if I couldn't see anything.

That was the same day and same airport where they told me to follow
the airliner ahead when I couldn't see past the Deb's wing tips. I
believe my reply was something to the effect of "I would if I could,
but I can't see my own wingtips". Which was followed by another...
"Uhhh... when you break out, follow the airliner." :-))


Musta woke the controller up from a nap?


I think it certainly woke him up, but not from a nap:-))

Over the years I've had them make just about as many mistakes as I
have. On one particular trip I was cleared to land at the wrong
airport. So pilots aren't the only ones making that mistake. When I
reminded them my flight plan called for the neighboring airport, the
usual short pause was followed by a "can you make the runway from your
current position?". It was visual and I could. Some one else must have
called the tower as they were expecting me and I was well inside
where I'd have normally switched for approach to the tower. The one
approach (at the other field) handles both fields although they have
separate towers. It's a good thing they cleared me for 17 instead of
23 as both airports have a 23 but where I was headed doesn't have a
17. :-)) Actually I was already suspicious as approach was almost
taking me over the end of the runway I was expecting to use.

Allen

Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member)
(N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair)
www.rogerhalstead.com
  #22  
Old February 12th 07, 03:15 AM posted to rec.aviation.ifr
Jim Carter[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 403
Default bad vectors, no hand off

Flew the Commanders in Seattle when I worked for Skycraft up there; flew the
6 in Tulsa when I worked for Bill Christiansen. Both are great aircraft - I
wouldn't be surprised if you can take the Commander apart and haul it in the
six.

I liked the seating in the Commander and the interior roominess better than
the 6 - but like someone else pointed out if you could get it in the 6, you
could fly it.

--
Jim Carter
Rogers, Arkansas
"Mortimer Schnerd, RN" mschnerdatcarolina.rr.com wrote in message
...
Bonehenge wrote:
There's always next year. -=8^(

And I liked the Six so much more than the Commander.



Me too. I've never flown a Commander but I've got a bunch of time flying
a Six to some very nice places. Never a 260 though... always a 300. I
understand the 260 actually has more useful load... which is already kind
of scary. I used to carry 6 adults, baggage, and diving gear (except for
tanks and weight belts) from North Carolina to various spots in the
Bahamas (with staging in and out of the Vero Beach/ St. Lucie County
area). One hell of a load... one hell of a bird.

What did the guy who won the AOPA bird fly? C-130's? He's never gonna be
satisfied with a Six. Schmuck.




--
Mortimer Schnerd, RN
mschnerdatcarolina.rr.com



  #23  
Old February 12th 07, 05:55 AM posted to rec.aviation.ifr
Mortimer Schnerd, RN[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 597
Default bad vectors, no hand off

Jim Carter wrote:
I liked the seating in the Commander and the interior roominess better than
the 6 - but like someone else pointed out if you could get it in the 6, you
could fly it.



So true. I used to use both a C-210 and the Six on my Bahamian runs. The 210
could make it nonstop but it was pretty tight for the folks in the back. It
also was tough finding space for all our crap. The Six didn't have the range or
the speed, but it definitely had the room. The rear seats were comfortable and
the forward baggage compartment made managing an aft CG pretty easy. Six
adults, full fuel, baggage and dive gear... we might waddle into the sky but I
never worried I wouldn't make it.

As many others have said, the limiting factor was whether you could get the
doors closed....




--
Mortimer Schnerd, RN
mschnerdatcarolina.rr.com


  #24  
Old February 13th 07, 10:03 PM posted to rec.aviation.ifr
John T
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 194
Default bad vectors, no hand off

"Newps" wrote in message


45 days.


....and do they really use tapes? I thought it was all hard drives now.

--
John T
http://sage1solutions.com/blogs/TknoFlyer
Reduce spam. Use Sender Policy Framework: http://openspf.org
____________________


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
RNAV vectors Dan Luke Instrument Flight Rules 74 December 26th 06 10:31 PM
Vectors over water paul kgyy Instrument Flight Rules 22 May 4th 05 09:15 PM
Lost Comms While on Vectors for traffic O. Sami Saydjari Instrument Flight Rules 14 April 26th 05 10:08 PM
Approach to an LOM/IAF with PT (not vectors to final) O. Sami Saydjari Instrument Flight Rules 35 April 13th 04 09:54 PM
Slam dunk into Janesville Steven P. McNicoll Piloting 0 July 31st 03 01:08 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:21 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.