If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Bell 427 Main Rotor System
Is anyone out there familar with the design of the Bell 427 main
rotor? Since I first saw it I've been quite a fan of the design with it's composite yoke for coning and flapping relief and it's rather novel and very simple damping elements. Yet today I read that Bell plans to re-rotor the 427 within the next year. Does anyone know why? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Is anyone out there familar with the design of the Bell 427 main
rotor? Since I first saw it I've been quite a fan of the design with it's composite yoke for coning and flapping relief and it's rather novel and very simple damping elements. Yet today I read that Bell plans to re-rotor the 427 within the next year. Does anyone know why? In the early days of flight the engineers also flew the aircraft which had the effect of eliminating bad engineerings very quickly. Today it seems as if Bell has all the test flying done by line pilots. 407, case in point, 427, case in point. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
The 427 rotor was ported over virtually unchanged from the 407. It was
originally designed for the Bell Model 400 back in the '70s, a design that was never fielded but was very similar to the unlamented Soloy Twin Ranger, was produced in quantity for the OH-58D, and was maxed out in terms of disc loading and gross weight capacity before the 427 came along. The 427 will never have competitive range and payload with the current rotor, something that was obvious when it was still on paper 7 years ago. Bell's late, great Ed Covington, Chief Engineer for rotor design, calculated in the spring of '97 that the 430 hub could be ported to the 427 with little change. It should have been done then. "Shaber CJ" wrote in message ... Is anyone out there familar with the design of the Bell 427 main rotor? Since I first saw it I've been quite a fan of the design with it's composite yoke for coning and flapping relief and it's rather novel and very simple damping elements. Yet today I read that Bell plans to re-rotor the 427 within the next year. Does anyone know why? In the early days of flight the engineers also flew the aircraft which had the effect of eliminating bad engineerings very quickly. Today it seems as if Bell has all the test flying done by line pilots. 407, case in point, 427, case in point. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
The 427 rotor was ported over virtually unchanged from the 407. It was
originally designed for the Bell Model 400 back in the '70s, a design that was never fielded but was very similar to the unlamented Soloy Twin Ranger, was produced in quantity for the OH-58D, and was maxed out in terms of disc loading and gross weight capacity before the 427 came along. The 427 will never have competitive range and payload with the current rotor, something that was obvious when it was still on paper 7 years ago. Bell's late, great Ed Covington, Chief Engineer for rotor design, calculated in the spring of '97 that the 430 hub could be ported to the 427 with little change. It should have been done then. Jim, thanks for the information. It is rather a same that American Helicopter manufacturers are not competitive with Europe. Maybe a clean sheet of paper would help. It seems the B206 has been recertified enough. It is just poor engineering and poor management to have to re-rotor already certified helicopters. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
"Shaber CJ" wrote in message ... The 427 rotor was ported over virtually unchanged from the 407. It was originally designed for the Bell Model 400 back in the '70s, a design that was never fielded but was very similar to the unlamented Soloy Twin Ranger, was produced in quantity for the OH-58D, and was maxed out in terms of disc loading and gross weight capacity before the 427 came along. The 427 will never have competitive range and payload with the current rotor, something that was obvious when it was still on paper 7 years ago. Bell's late, great Ed Covington, Chief Engineer for rotor design, calculated in the spring of '97 that the 430 hub could be ported to the 427 with little change. It should have been done then. Jim, thanks for the information. It is rather a same that American Helicopter manufacturers are not competitive with Europe. Maybe a clean sheet of paper would help. It seems the B206 has been recertified enough. It is just poor engineering and poor management to have to re-rotor already certified helicopters. Gotta agree with this statement. I have been a diehard Bell supporter for many years (205, 206, 212) and I am also S-70 (UH-60) trained. Last year I switched allegances to Eurocopter (EC-665 Tiger) and I must confess that in my opinion (only), EC have it all over Bell and Sikorsky for rotorcraft design and their manufacturing technologies. This Tiger is an absolute work of art. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Bob M wrote:
Thanks for the info. You can see that they are virtual clones. Still very creative and extremely simple. I must have misread the article, I thought that it said that they intended to design a brand new articulated rotor. I can't understand why when like you said they have a BMR from the 430 that they could retrofit. They may very well intend to design a new articulated rotor, but I doubt it. The current rotor is semi-articulated witha composite yoke. They may just try to scale it up, but the stacked hub bearingless rotor from the 430 is a mature technology now with the scaled up versions implemented on the UH-1Y and AH-1Z. On the other hand, no one has actually built a yoke like that for a mast as skinny as the one on the 427. Still, once it's implemented and successful in practice, look to see it ported to the 407 -- although that would necessitate redundant hydraulics for the 407. Great ship, if it were just a little easier boost off. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
I was wrong. I checked with Bell and they will indeed field a new
articulated rotor. The design gives superior CG range compared to the limited flapping of the 430 type head. "Jim Burt" wrote in message ... Bob M wrote: Thanks for the info. You can see that they are virtual clones. Still very creative and extremely simple. I must have misread the article, I thought that it said that they intended to design a brand new articulated rotor. I can't understand why when like you said they have a BMR from the 430 that they could retrofit. They may very well intend to design a new articulated rotor, but I doubt it. The current rotor is semi-articulated witha composite yoke. They may just try to scale it up, but the stacked hub bearingless rotor from the 430 is a mature technology now with the scaled up versions implemented on the UH-1Y and AH-1Z. On the other hand, no one has actually built a yoke like that for a mast as skinny as the one on the 427. Still, once it's implemented and successful in practice, look to see it ported to the 407 -- although that would necessitate redundant hydraulics for the 407. Great ship, if it were just a little easier boost off. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
American nazi pond scum, version two | bushite kills bushite | Naval Aviation | 0 | December 21st 04 10:46 PM |
I'm a flight Instructor & I can't even get a job at Taco Bell | Brad Zeigler | Piloting | 6 | November 18th 04 07:28 PM |
bell xp-77-info? | J. Paaso | Home Built | 0 | March 25th 04 12:19 PM |
Taiwan to make parts for new Bell military helicopters | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | February 28th 04 12:12 AM |
Warszaw Pact War Plans ( The Effects of a Global Thermonuclear War ...) | Matt Wiser | Military Aviation | 0 | December 7th 03 08:20 PM |