If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
F-15C. Unchallenged combat record.
How much combat has the SU-27/37 seen? Call me when they get some actual experience. Just FYI 2 Su 27's from Lipetsk (a Russian "Top gun" school) flew to Langley air force base where they competed against F-15's. If think it was in 1992. but what was surprising for some was the fact that the Sukhoi proved to be better in almost every aspect-there was only one test in which F-15 barely managed to beat Su 27...Pilot skill??? I agree with those who say that it plays important role, because it really does... Somehow, I doubt the Americans would send rookies to compete against Russian pilots, those who flew in these F-15's probably had lots of experience. I know that Sukhoi's were operated by Lipetsk school instructors... Anyway, Americans always relied on hi-tech electronics whereas Russians relied on super-maneuvreability. Heck, even the Pentagon stated that the new generation fighter should be capable of doing some of those maneuvres-in this case Pugachev's cobra...Su 27 the rest of it's "family" except the IB version are capable of doing it without trust vectoring (Su 37 can do even more becuse of trust vect.)-I would bet that the F-35 won't be able to do it even with trust vectoring. (And no, F-18 can't pull off a true Cobra)Why? Most of Russian fighter classes since 80's are aerodynamicly stable (Ok, some of them not on every axis)-they tend to rise by themselves where US fighters tend to fall and need good FBW systems-F 22 would be almost unflyable without one. When is a US fighter going to be able to do a Somersault? Some will say those are only things for airshows but in dogfight they could mean a difference... Not to mention the Su 27's EOS system which enables him a stealthy detection without the use of radar...some will say "So what, it covers only 15 km depending on the weather conditions". True, yet you could detect F-117 with it. Let's face it, stealth may seem a good idea but it's worth only in BVR fight, planes will always leave IR trails no matter how invisible they are for radar, not to mention there are ground systems which can detect stealth planes (they aren't based on doppler effect as radars are). Besides, I reckon the R-27 and R-77 sound familiar to you, both excellent in close and BVR fight (although I heard a rumor that one R-77 missile missed a drone target and hit a civilian airplane, yet this one is unconfirmed)...Super maneuvreability+R-27 (or some of it's equivalents)+off boresight capability could pose a serious threat even if an average pilot flew the plane...Btw...anyone remember that Le Bourget crash showing K-36 efficiency, I doubt Martin Baker seats are as good as the "Zvezda" (Ok, probably close, yet not as good)... All in all, I wouldn't be surprised to see Su kick ass of any US fighter...Just one thing for the end-the first air-to-air kill of the Gulf War is believed to be a US F-18 shot down by an Iraqi MiG-25 on 17 January 1991. Yeah, the Israeli F-15's shot down 3 MiG-25's but MiG-25 was capable of doing damage and getting out of there fast-at 2,8 Mach US fighters could just watch in the Iraqi case (AIM 120's couldn't do the job)...What is was trying to say the whole time is that Russian fighters (I'm talkin about Suhkoi's) may or may not be so perfect, but you sure can't just underestimate them and start shouting US Air force has the best planes and pilots in the whole wide world...it hasn't-you all know how the excercise with India went on and I don't have to explain what it means... |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
"SA" wrote in message . .. "Ragnar" skrev i en meddelelse ... "Icarus" wrote in message ... As the subject says, I'd like to know which is the best modern jet fighter in your opinion??? Personaly, my bet is on Su 27 family-in particular the Su 37 fighter... F-15C. Unchallenged combat record. How much combat has the SU-27/37 seen? Call me when they get some actual experience. Well as far as i remember, there has been air-to-air combat between Ethiopian and Eriterian (spelling?) Su-27's and MiG-29, in which the Su-27 shot down a couple of MiG-29's, so the Su-27 does have combat experience against the same aircraft as the F-15. OK, is it 120-0? As far as I know the F-15 has "only" fought against Iraqi and Serbian MiG's, so they do have similar combat experience, although the F-15 most likely have flown more combat hours. Umm, you forget Israeli experience. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
"Ragnar" skrev i en meddelelse ... "SA" wrote in message . .. "Ragnar" skrev i en meddelelse ... "Icarus" wrote in message ... As the subject says, I'd like to know which is the best modern jet fighter in your opinion??? Personaly, my bet is on Su 27 family-in particular the Su 37 fighter... F-15C. Unchallenged combat record. How much combat has the SU-27/37 seen? Call me when they get some actual experience. Well as far as i remember, there has been air-to-air combat between Ethiopian and Eriterian (spelling?) Su-27's and MiG-29, in which the Su-27 shot down a couple of MiG-29's, so the Su-27 does have combat experience against the same aircraft as the F-15. OK, is it 120-0? No, I just wanted to point out that the Flanker has shotdown aircrafts of the same type as the F-15 has. As far as I know the F-15 has "only" fought against Iraqi and Serbian MiG's, so they do have similar combat experience, although the F-15 most likely have flown more combat hours. Umm, you forget Israeli experience. Yeah I know I forgot that, as you can see from my post above. Regards Søren Augustesen |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
TJ, the Su-37 was re-converted back to Su-35 due to FBW enhacement that gave
the virtually same maneuverablity as with TV engines. Ken Duffey wrote about this. I don't know if we are talking about the same one that crashed, since I am too lazy to browse my archive . Nele NULLA ROSA SINE SPINA TJ wrote in message . .. "Icarus" wrote in message ... As the subject says, I'd like to know which is the best modern jet fighter in your opinion??? Personaly, my bet is on Su 27 family-in particular the Su 37 fighter... The one and only SU-37 FLANKER E crashed a couple of years ago. The aircraft carried the number 711. TJ |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
John Doe wrote in message ... "Icarus" wrote in message ... As the subject says, I'd like to know which is the best modern jet fighter in your opinion??? Personaly, my bet is on Su 27 family-in particular the Su 37 fighter... To do what? Most succesful air superiority (proven, series) F-15. Most capable air superiority (low/no combat record) Su-27 (Ethyopia)/Su-30MKI (India). Best all-round (proven, series) F-16C. Best all-round (by figures) MiG-29SMT (SMT2, MRCA) Best fighter/interceptor (proven, combat) F-14A (Iranian); Best pure "true supersonic" interceptor (by figures, series) MiG-31 Better than expected "true supersonic" fighter/interceptor (proven, series): MiG-25PD(e) (Iraq/Iran war, Gulf 1) Now, "raw" figures point to the situation above.However, the introduction of R-77 for Russian (Su-27, Su-30), Indian (MiG-21/93, modified MiG-29-12b, "custom" Su-30MKI) and Malesian AF ("custom" MiG-29SE) could change tide-but only on "figures" side. Naval multirole fighters would include F/A-18 (US, all versions, series, proven) and MiG-29K (by "figures" for India, very similar to MiG-29SMT/M). But, the pilot QUALITY is a big factor-for example, handful of Iraqi MiG-25PD(e)'s piloted by elite pilots were dangerous, while their numerous MiG-23ML/29As piloted by inepts were sitting ducks. Same goes for alleged victory of Ethyopian (Russian-flown) Su-27s over Erythreyan (Ukrainian-flown) MiG-29s (using R-73 missiles). Nele NULLA ROSA SINE SPINA |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
"Nele VII" wrote Most succesful air superiority (proven, series) F-15. Most capable air superiority (low/no combat record) Su-27 (Ethyopia)/Su-30MKI (India). Best all-round (proven, series) F-16C. Best all-round (by figures) MiG-29SMT (SMT2, MRCA) Best fighter/interceptor (proven, combat) F-14A (Iranian); Best pure "true supersonic" interceptor (by figures, series) MiG-31 Better than expected "true supersonic" fighter/interceptor (proven, series): MiG-25PD(e) (Iraq/Iran war, Gulf 1) Now, "raw" figures point to the situation above.However, the introduction of R-77 for Russian (Su-27, Su-30), Indian (MiG-21/93, modified MiG-29-12b, "custom" Su-30MKI) and Malesian AF ("custom" MiG-29SE) could change tide-but only on "figures" side. Naval multirole fighters would include F/A-18 (US, all versions, series, proven) and MiG-29K (by "figures" for India, very similar to MiG-29SMT/M). But, the pilot QUALITY is a big factor-for example, handful of Iraqi MiG-25PD(e)'s piloted by elite pilots were dangerous, while their numerous MiG-23ML/29As piloted by inepts were sitting ducks. Same goes for alleged victory of Ethyopian (Russian-flown) Su-27s over Erythreyan (Ukrainian-flown) MiG-29s (using R-73 missiles). Nele NULLA ROSA SINE SPINA Look...It's Kurt Plummer, reconstituted, translated into Russian, then back to English. Pete |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Dav1936531 wrote in message ... From: "Pete" Look...It's Kurt Plummer, reconstituted, translated into Russian, then back to English. Pete Now THAT'S funny!! Dave Yes... and I am not Russian! )) Nele NULLA ROSA SINE SPINA |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
"Nele VII" wrote in message ...
TJ, the Su-37 was re-converted back to Su-35 due to FBW enhacement that gave the virtually same maneuverablity as with TV engines. Ken Duffey wrote about this. I don't know if we are talking about the same one that crashed, since I am too lazy to browse my archive . Nele NULLA ROSA SINE SPINA Yes I know that. It was simply to make it easier on the original poster without going into details. Most people know 711 as the Su-37, but are unaware of its re-designation. Recent reports from Russia suggest that they will re-launch the Su-37 with a new-build aircraft. TJ |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
My favour is SAAB Jas Gripen. Economical and modern. Small but have all what have larger fighters.
|
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
No More New Fighter Aircraft Types? | W. D. Allen Sr. | Military Aviation | 120 | April 18th 04 07:08 AM |
The end of the manned fighter? | Cub Driver | Military Aviation | 21 | March 19th 04 10:37 PM |
In-depth article on modern fighter jet engines | Bjørnar Bolsøy | Military Aviation | 0 | December 21st 03 08:17 PM |
Modern day propeller fighter - hypothetical | Nev | Military Aviation | 38 | December 6th 03 05:39 AM |
Joint Russian-French 5th generation fighter? | lihakirves | Military Aviation | 1 | July 5th 03 01:36 AM |