A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Cirrus Killer? Cessna just doesn't get it...



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 30th 05, 04:09 PM
ET
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Cirrus Killer? Cessna just doesn't get it...

Reading Avwebs latest addition (avweb.com) I'm reading all about how
Cessna is developing (very hush hush) their "cirrus killer", new high
performance 4 place single. They are being very hush hush about the
whole thing, except for one point; the new design will be a high
wing....

Without debating the idea of high wing vs low wing as far as flying
advantages, the "perception" (right or wrong)of the high wing is a lower
& slower plane . When have you seen a jet fighter with a high wing??

To the public at large, a low wing plane is just a sexier, faster
"look" to it. I predict for that reason alone, the new "Cirrus Killer"
Cessna will fail, not because it won't be a superior airplane, it
probably will be, by the mere fact that it is designed to be, but
because it will not "look" sexy enough with the high wing... no matter
how well it performs, it will still have at its heart, the look of a
150/172.....

When I spend 350grand I want people to look at my plane and say ohhhh,
ahhhh, not just pilots either…. A high wing will design will not make me
feel like Maverick on "Top Gun"… (Tell me honestly you don't see almost
every Cirrus buyer playing "highway to the danger zone" mentally in his
head at some point while flying his new Cirrus…heh)

And if it doesnt have the BRS or GRS or equivelent, it will also fail.
Many pilots wives are much less nervous about flying with a BRS
installed (again, right or wrong, what is important in this level of the
market is perception... if it was all about money, they would all be
buying 20 year old 180's..)

--
-- ET :-)

"A common mistake people make when trying to design something
completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete
fools."---- Douglas Adams
  #2  
Old September 30th 05, 04:42 PM
Denny
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Well, high wing and shoulder wings come to mind...
AV8 Harrier
FA18
F14 Tomcat
B52
FA22

Probably more but I'm not a military type... Let others chime in...

The $350K Cirrus driver on our field sold it, and his brand new hangar,
after he wrecked the plane - twice... Dunno what was playing in his
head at the time, but it should have been the theme from Get Smart...

denny

  #3  
Old September 30th 05, 05:01 PM
john smith
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I will take being able to stand up out of the weather under the
protection of the high wing any day over trying to hold an umbrella
while loading pax and baggage.
  #4  
Old September 30th 05, 05:10 PM
Peter R.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

john smith wrote:

I will take being able to stand up out of the weather under the
protection of the high wing any day over trying to hold an umbrella
while loading pax and baggage.


Not to mention stepping up onto the wing to enter the cabin. I have been
flying more Angel Flight patients lately who are having a problem with
this.

--
Peter
(a low wing aircraft owner)

















----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
  #5  
Old September 30th 05, 10:50 PM
john smith
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
"Peter R." wrote:

john smith wrote:

I will take being able to stand up out of the weather under the
protection of the high wing any day over trying to hold an umbrella
while loading pax and baggage.


Not to mention stepping up onto the wing to enter the cabin. I have been
flying more Angel Flight patients lately who are having a problem with
this.


That is where the Cherokee Six/Saratoga are the most practical.
The rear doors are low enough to allow the pax to set their butts down
on the lower door sill and slide/turn into the cabin.
  #6  
Old September 30th 05, 05:15 PM
Stefan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

john smith wrote:

I will take being able to stand up out of the weather under the
protection of the high wing any day over trying to hold an umbrella
while loading pax and baggage.


You mean like this:
http://community.webshots.com/photo/...80638909QTqtNi

Stefan
  #7  
Old September 30th 05, 05:49 PM
Andrew Gideon
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Stefan wrote:

You mean like this:
http://community.webshots.com/photo/...80638909QTqtNi


Here, kitty kitty kitty.

- Andrew

  #8  
Old September 30th 05, 06:56 PM
George Patterson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Stefan wrote:

You mean like this:
http://community.webshots.com/photo/...80638909QTqtNi


Just remember that it's the co-pilot's job to do the preflight. :-)

George Patterson
Drink is the curse of the land. It makes you quarrel with your neighbor.
It makes you shoot at your landlord. And it makes you miss him.
  #9  
Old September 30th 05, 07:47 PM
Gig 601XL Builder
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Stefan" wrote in message
...
john smith wrote:

I will take being able to stand up out of the weather under the
protection of the high wing any day over trying to hold an umbrella while
loading pax and baggage.


You mean like this:
http://community.webshots.com/photo/...80638909QTqtNi



Attention passenger of Blue Sky Flight 999. There will be a slight delay
before boarding.


  #10  
Old September 30th 05, 08:35 PM
Andrew Gideon
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Gig 601XL Builder wrote:

Attention passenger of Blue Sky Flight 999. There will be a slight delay
before boarding.


I forwarded this to a friend, and he didn't see "preflight". He saw kitties
lining up for a buffet immediately following a landing.

- Andrew

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
1/72 Cessna 300, 400 series scale models Ale Owning 3 October 22nd 13 03:40 PM
Nearly had my life terminated today Michelle P Piloting 11 September 3rd 05 02:37 AM
Wow - heard on the air... (long) Nathan Young Piloting 68 July 25th 05 06:51 PM
Parachute fails to save SR-22 Capt.Doug Piloting 72 February 10th 05 05:14 AM
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools RT Military Aviation 104 September 25th 03 03:17 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:14 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.