If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Question for UH or other RC personnel
At 16:22 28 February 2012, Dan Marotta wrote:
I'm a simple person, honest, and generally unsuspecting. If I understand correctly, XCSoar v 6.2.6 has no AH capability. It works just fine for my needs and, frankly, none of the whiz-bang products will ever enable me to win a national contest. So, if XCSoar v 6.3 has an AH, it seems simple enough to just not download and install it. Look at the startup screen - it tells the version. And, yes, I know a SW engineer or a hacker could make a simple source code change to fake this but, as I said, I'm honest. Are you? If you're going to win a contest or be a safe pilot, it will not be because of any device you've got in your pocket or panel. So what if the RC bans XCSoar or LK8000 or the Butterfly? It won't be money out of Max's pocket. Anyone thought of looking to see who gains from the banning of software by certain providers? Someone will. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Question for UH or other RC personnel | Mike[_37_] | Soaring | 6 | February 28th 12 02:26 PM |
Military Personnel and Veteran Database | Otis Willie | Naval Aviation | 0 | August 22nd 05 03:52 AM |
Military Personnel and Veteran Registry, Since 1988 | Otis Willie | Naval Aviation | 3 | October 1st 04 03:06 AM |
Great War Veteran Unveils Memorial to Air Personnel | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | September 11th 04 08:35 PM |
Will The Proposed Change In ATC Personnel Requirements Impact Safety? | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 6 | June 23rd 04 03:38 AM |