If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#111
|
|||
|
|||
"Al Denelsbeck" wrote in message . 8... "kalijaa" wrote in : "Al Denelsbeck" wrote in message . 6... This is the third response to this messsage. The first two have yet to appear on the thread. The problem is probably on my end. Otherwise, they may eventually trickle down, but I'm not waiting for that. With respect to this garbage: Pretty scattered behavior for someone who claims to be pursuing some kind of 'research', and research, moreover, that nobody would really give a damn about. Al, you are either dyslectic, an imbecile or a liar. Most likely, you are a combination of at least two of those. Your implication that I mentioned "study" or claimed to be pursuing some kind of research, is a lie. You, who on 10/25/03 posted: "Since you're offering this so comfortably, you undoubtedly have a reputable source at hand that backs up your claims. So trot it out. Because I'm telling you right now you're full of ****," now have a first rate opportunity to show us how its done. The "reputable source at hand" is right in front of you. Your task will be easy if you're telling the truth and impossible if you're lying. Search the thread, find the message where I mentioned study or research, repost the message here and prove me a liar, or fail to do so and prove yourself to be a pathetic fraud who wound up hoisted on his own petard and an ass who foolishly draws attention to himself with bluff and bluster. Your bluff has been called. Mmmmmmm, yeah, or what? If I don't provide you with this, what are you gonna do, run around in even more circles dodging the issue? Try to deflect it, yet again, onto another track to hide the fact that you haven't a clue what the hell you're spouting about? Since you like pulling up the old stuff, pull up the post where I invited you to give a source, any source, for your ramblings. Remember that one? Yes, I remember that one. I gave your invitation all the consideration it deserved. I ignored it. You should - it was the one that sent you scurrying. Did it? Then why are you still sending me these sweet tidings? Still haven't seen an answer to that one, and now you want to make demands of me? Quite amusing. I demand nothing, but call you liar. I invite your defense, but expect wind instead. I've served my purpose. Yes, you have served a purpose. Liars unmasked prove the converse of their thesis. A little pushing caused you to find a surprising amount of ways to avoid actually providing any real info, which has demonstrated your real worth to the rest of the group. The information proving that you are a liar is in the record of this thread. Unfortunately for you, the false 'information' forming the basis for your lie only appears in your message. But it appears I could have saved the effort, since you immediately involved yourself in an infantile game of grab-ass with SpEdByrd, so if THAT doesn't classify you, I'm not sure what would... That's a fair example of how you serve another purpose. You're presumption that SpeedByrd is in a class beneath yours, perfectly illustrates your imbecility. Gad flys rank high above liars. Wanna have the last word? Knock yourself out - it won't change the damage you've already done to yourself ;-) I distinctly detect the sound of scurrying. Is it a bug? A rat? A liar? Is that you . . Al ? |
#112
|
|||
|
|||
"Speedbyyrd" wrote in message ... nozh smaj kapop I don't talk to terrorist scum. Go away. The SpeedByrd : From what I've read of your drivelings, you talk to no one else. Is it really true that you and Al are twins? He speaks highly of you, but I do detect a hint of sibling rivalry. Kalijaa |
#113
|
|||
|
|||
On 3 Nov 2003 23:45:49 -0600, Speedbyyrd wrote:
You an that garbage terrorist should get a room together. The SpeedByrd : Hell, YOU get rooms with guys all the time! Right, SpeedQueer! |
#114
|
|||
|
|||
"Speedbyyrd" wrote in message ... Nothing to do with him. Together with you, air is fouled on this ng. Go back to 'terror land'. The SpeedByrd : You're a matched set. |
#115
|
|||
|
|||
"Speedbyyrd" wrote in message ... On Tue, 4 Nov 2003 09:48:36 -0800, "kalijaa" wrote: You're a scuzzbag A-Rab The SpeedByrd : Your fadder's moustache |
#116
|
|||
|
|||
"Speedbyyrd" wrote in message ... On Tue, 4 Nov 2003 17:35:06 -0800, "kalijaa" wrote: Shut up. The SpeedByrd : Good idea. Show us how it's done. Kalijaa. |
#117
|
|||
|
|||
"Speedbyyrd" wrote in message ... On Tue, 4 Nov 2003 22:35:47 -0800, "kalijaa" wrote: "Speedbyyrd" wrote in message .. . On Tue, 4 Nov 2003 17:35:06 -0800, "kalijaa" wrote: Shut up. The SpeedByrd : Good idea. Show us how it's done. Kalijaa. You first, A-Rab!! The SpeedByrd : No. Nope, won't do it, won't do it |
#118
|
|||
|
|||
"Speedbyyrd" wrote in message ... / You'll do what you'e told, A-Rab scum!!! Now back into your box! The SpeedByrd : nix |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
RAF Blind/Beam Approach Training flights | Geoffrey Sinclair | Military Aviation | 3 | September 4th 09 06:31 PM |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
new theory of flight released Sept 2004 | Mark Oliver | Aerobatics | 1 | October 5th 04 10:20 PM |
us air force us air force academy us air force bases air force museum us us air force rank us air force reserve adfunk | Jehad Internet | Military Aviation | 0 | February 7th 04 04:24 AM |
"I Want To FLY!"-(Youth) My store to raise funds for flying lessons | Curtl33 | General Aviation | 7 | January 9th 04 11:35 PM |