I give up, after many, many years!

On Jun 1, 3:04 am, Tina wrote:
On Jun 1, 5:37 am, Mxsmanic wrote:

terry writes:
I dont doubt you analysed it Anthony, but you still havent seen, or
aren't willing to admit , that you had it all wrong. Now what has the
SOURCE of the air pressure got to do with the discussion?

A great deal. Without gravity, air pressure would be zero, and volume would
be infinite.

As a student pilot, if you have no gravity, you could
have smaller wings on your airplane, right?

Well, no. The gas 'laws' are approximations and fail to be predictive
except within certain ranges, just as Newtonian physics are valid only
in certain ranges..

Doing wing sectional sims, I used the centrifugal
force of the displaced air over the wing surfaces.
It is a fairly simple algorithm, in accord with physics,
and works surprisingly well.
It also stalls well, since Energy=Force x distance,
and once the airstream kinetic energy is bled off,
the airstream reverses and follows the wing to
give turbulence. Good Stuff.
Ken

Ken S. Tucker writes:

As a student pilot, if you have no gravity, you could
have smaller wings on your airplane, right?

Without gravity, wings serve little purpose.

On Jun 1, 12:07 pm, Mxsmanic wrote:
Ken S. Tucker writes:
As a student pilot, if you have no gravity, you could
have smaller wings on your airplane, right?

Without gravity, wings serve little purpose.

But you'd still need to steer, right?

Mxsmanic wrote:
Carly Fiorina

Please don't use foul language in this newsgroup.

On Jun 2, 3:07*am, "Ken S. Tucker" wrote:

Doing wing sectional sims, I used the centrifugal
force of the displaced air over the wing surfaces.
It is a fairly simple algorithm, in accord with physics,
and works surprisingly well.

A fictional force for a fictional calcullation. Sounds about right.

LOL

Cheers

"Ken S. Tucker" wrote in
:

On Jun 1, 3:04 am, Tina wrote:
On Jun 1, 5:37 am, Mxsmanic wrote:

terry writes:
I dont doubt you analysed it Anthony, but you still havent seen,
or aren't willing to admit , that you had it all wrong. Now what
has the SOURCE of the air pressure got to do with the discussion?

A great deal. Without gravity, air pressure would be zero, and
volume would be infinite.

As a student pilot, if you have no gravity, you could
have smaller wings on your airplane, right?

Well, no. The gas 'laws' are approximations and fail to be predictive
except within certain ranges, just as Newtonian physics are valid
only in certain ranges..

Doing wing sectional sims, I used the centrifugal
force of the displaced air over the wing surfaces.
It is a fairly simple algorithm, in accord with physics,
and works surprisingly well.
It also stalls well, since Energy=Force x distance,
and once the airstream kinetic energy is bled off,
the airstream reverses and follows the wing to
give turbulence. Good Stuff.


Good grief.

Bertie

"Ken S. Tucker" wrote in news:bafc87a0-1671-4ee5-
:

On Jun 1, 12:07 pm, Mxsmanic wrote:
Ken S. Tucker writes:
As a student pilot, if you have no gravity, you could
have smaller wings on your airplane, right?

Without gravity, wings serve little purpose.

But you'd still need to steer, right?


Where have you got to go?



Bertie

"Bertie the Bunyip" wrote in message
...
"Maxwell" luv2^fly99@cox.^net wrote in news:Fym%j.56$kR5.31
@newsfe24.lga:


"Bertie the Bunyip" wrote in message
.. .


Matters not. it's all about keeping th ek00k on the boil, k00kie
boi....


Bertie

Lame and incorrect, D-.


Nope. Your smileys stink. BTW.



Don't quit your day job.




I haven't.

"Bertie the Bunyip" wrote in message
...
"Maxwell" luv2^fly99@cox.^net wrote in
news

"Bertie the Bunyip" wrote in message
...
"Kloudy via AviationKB.com" u33403@uwe wrote in
news:84d93dd6a5c60@uwe:

terry wrote:

LABotomy...

Nice pick up Cloudy. I cant take any credit for that one, my
spelling is terrable
Terry

in your case, Terryble.


Go to your room.


Bertie

You wish.,

































































































































































































































































































































Dumb ass.

"Bertie the Bunyip" wrote in message
...
"Maxwell" luv2^fly99@cox.^net wrote in news:7zm%j.57$kR5.16
@newsfe24.lga:


"Bertie the Bunyip" wrote in message
.. .

Nope.

Oh, and BTW, everyone can see it but you. Therein lies the beauty...


Bertie

Lame and incorrect again, F.