Gliders in the Grand Canyon

Mxsmanic wrote:
writes:

Have you ever seen a real A/FD and noticed the chapter "Chart Bulletin"
where updates to charts are published or the chapter "Notices" were
the current altitudes for SFAR-50-2 are published?

I've seen SFAR-50-2, the one that says "extending upward from the surface" and
names a number of airfields within the SFRA.

That's not what I asked, you babbling, arrogant, childish, twit.

Could it be that since MSFS doesn't have anything like the A/FD you
just can't understand the concept?

--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.

wrote

Could it be that since MSFS doesn't have anything like the A/FD you
just can't understand the concept?

Bingo.

Why is this twit still here?

Why has he not been shunned?

He is far worse than Ralphie, Zoom, Juan, .....all put together.

Why is he still being acknowledged?
--
Jim in NC

"Mxsmanic" wrote in message
...

The active posters here who matter also show at least a modicum of
respect,
since both civility and competence have a common root in intelligence.
The
others don't matter, and so their respect or lack thereof is unimportant.

Interesting statement for someone clearly shows not respect for those that
attempt to educate him.


Like most newsgroups, this newsgroup is afflicted by a gang of regulars
who
depend on each other for validation and bully anyone they don't like or
anyone
who threatens their security (which essentially means anyone who doesn't
submit to them, as they tend to be very insecure). These people are not
very
intelligent and whether they respect others or not makes not difference
(although it is interesting to note that such people rarely respect anyone
beyond themselves). They also are not very knowledgeable on the topics
under
discussion, and their strutting aggression in the newsgroup cannot hide
this.
Their posts consist mostly of highly predictable personal attacks, and are
easy to identify and ignore.

Your usual troll, meant only to irritate and inflame. You really do sound
like a broken record. I feel so sorry for the poor soul that desperately
seeks the truth in aviation.


I look past the standard noise for information that will be useful to me.
Some people occasionally provide it. The rest is removed by the noise
filters.

Your noise filter is your own insanity.



Not really. I post questions to which I'd like to have answers.
Sometimes
people give me useful answers; sometimes not. The static from the little
boys
may hide the useful information (if any) from the uninitiated but not from
USENET veterans.

You're a lying asswipe. You post here only to irritate pilots, and attempt
to degrade their forum. The only thing that keeps your worthless butt alive
is either the constant stream of the unsuspecting, or those with an
overwhelming urge to be helpful to most anyone.

You are simply a parasite of the sickest kind.

Maxwell writes:

Interesting statement for someone clearly shows not respect for those that
attempt to educate him.

I don't follow the alpha dog, and I don't join social clubs. If you know what
you are talking about, you don't need anyone's validation; if you don't, no
amount of validation will eliminate your insecurity.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Mxsmanic wrote:
Maxwell writes:

Interesting statement for someone clearly shows not respect for those that
attempt to educate him.

I don't follow the alpha dog, and I don't join social clubs. If you know what
you are talking about, you don't need anyone's validation; if you don't, no
amount of validation will eliminate your insecurity.

Based on the number of things you think you know and how many
times you've been corrected by real world pilots and controllers in
this group, not only do you not follow any alpha dog in this group,
you're no-where near the pack; in fact, I doubt anyone would want you
near the pack.

See Anthony, You come here with off the wall, incorrect, and
most of the time, outlandish statements that you think are fact, and
argue that experienced people here are wrong when they correct you.
You've done it so much that you'vegone beyond us having to prove you
wrong. You actually need to prove yourself RIGHT. And time and time
again you have *FAILED* to do that.

Insecure? no. bark dog and yip dog following alpha dog in a
pack? no. Waiting for you to come to your senses and see how foolish
you are to throw the experience of pilots in this group back in their
faces? yes. However, there's more of a chance that the US will launch
spy satellites over Canada and than you coming to your senses.

BL.
- --
Brad Littlejohn | Email:
Unix Systems Administrator, |
Web + NewsMaster, BOFH.. Smeghead! | http://www.wizard.com/~tyketto
PGP: 1024D/E319F0BF 6980 AAD6 7329 E9E6 D569 F620 C819 199A E319 F0BF

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFGbPftyBkZmuMZ8L8RAhTCAJ9Don3F2gS8Xf2w1ZQWKd 2YlIQp+QCfUDTw
IOazNDFonezFKuegs4ZkvHQ=
=F6mH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

"Mxsmanic" wrote in message
...
Maxwell writes:

Interesting statement for someone clearly shows not respect for those
that
attempt to educate him.

I don't follow the alpha dog, and I don't join social clubs. If you know
what
you are talking about, you don't need anyone's validation; if you don't,
no
amount of validation will eliminate your insecurity.

Clearly not the point dumbass. Your lack of respect simply disqualifies any
of you opinions based on your own criteria.

A Guy Called Tyketto writes:

Based on the number of things you think you know and how many
times you've been corrected by real world pilots and controllers in
this group, not only do you not follow any alpha dog in this group,
you're no-where near the pack; in fact, I doubt anyone would want you
near the pack.

I wouldn't want to follow the alpha dog, either. That's for schoolchildren
and angry young males, and I am neither.

Maxwell writes:

Clearly not the point dumbass. Your lack of respect simply disqualifies any
of you opinions based on your own criteria.

Respect has no correlation with the validity of statements a person might
make.

Another War Story

In the time frame '49-'53 I was instructing in F-80A/B's at Willie
Field, Chandler AZ (just south of Phoenix).

On numerous occasions I would fly up to the Grand Canyon and do loops
in Canyon below the rim.

They finally made us stop as we were scaring the donkeys carrying
tourists up and down from rim to river at bottom.

Oh, those were the days )

Big John

**********************************************

On Sat, 02 Jun 2007 15:05:06 +0200, Mxsmanic
wrote:

If there were no airspace restrictions, would it be possible/safe to fly
gliders in the Grand Canyon? There's not much of a place to land in the
canyon, of course, but I don't know if there are thermals or something (?)
that would allow a glider to climb back up out of the canyon after gliding
below the rim. Is it possible? Has anyone done it?

"Mxsmanic" wrote in message
...
Maxwell writes:

Clearly not the point dumbass. Your lack of respect simply disqualifies
any
of you opinions based on your own criteria.

Respect has no correlation with the validity of statements a person might
make.

6/8/2007 at 12:05 am, in this thread you wrote.

"Mxsmanic" wrote in message
...

The active posters here who matter also show at least a modicum of
respect,
since both civility and competence have a common root in intelligence.

Your own words just two days ago dip****.