If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Oh, and the BS about crashing your server is just that, BS. We test the web
site with all browsers, including the latest releases of Firefox and Opera and have yet to crash them. You obviously have something wrong with your configuration, since you are the only person complaining about crashing of browsers out some 35,000+ readers a day who access the main page, the 13,500 registered users who access the libraries, and over 80,000 registered users who access the library. With all those successful users, you think their might be a problem with YOUR system? -- Best Regards, Tom Allensworth www.avsim.com Join Us In Denver for the 2004 Conference and Exhibition! http://www.avsim.com/pages/2004conf/ "Kurt Weber" wrote in message ... "Greg Copeland" wrote in message news On Sun, 13 Jun 2004 03:43:41 -0500, Kurt Weber wrote: "Thijs Wolters" wrote in message ... Were can I download for MS fl.sim 2004 (or 2002) the Catalina PBY-5? Thanks for help. Thijs. flightsim.com Better selection than avsim, and a faster-loading website that won't crash your browser to boot. Download speeds could be adressed (or often helped) if they started using bit torrent. Did you read what I said? The AVSIM website ITSELF is what takes forever to load (and that's if it doesn't crash your browser). -- Kurt Weber |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
On Mon, 21 Jun 2004 18:09:42 -0400, Tom Allensworth wrote:
Oh, and the BS about crashing your server is just that, BS. We test the web site with all browsers, including the latest releases of Firefox and Opera and have yet to crash them. You obviously have something wrong with your configuration, since you are the only person complaining about crashing of browsers out some 35,000+ readers a day who access the main page, the 13,500 registered users who access the libraries, and over 80,000 registered users who access the library. With all those successful users, you think their might be a problem with YOUR system? I think you're on to something here! BTW, as one of those crazy, alternative OS guys, please allow me to say thank you for testing with many browsers and not just IE. I suspect he's trolling or worse, has some reason to plug the other site. Cheers, Greg |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
"Greg Copeland" wrote in message
news LOL. What an idiot you. You're rude and attacked. Then lie about it. What a dolt. Look. If you thought I was rude, then like it or not, you are wrong. I was not being rude. You're free to think otherwise, of course, but you will still be wrong. Incidentally, you will note that you are the one insulting me; not vice-versa. This is unreal. I'm amazed. You need to go back and read. What an idiot you are. You're attacking me for being helping AND offering information which may be of value to you and the site that you're complaining about. No, I'm just curious why you posted a response which appeared to have nothing to do with my original post. I don't particularly care one way or the other; I'm just curious. -- Kurt Weber |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
"Tom Allensworth" wrote in message
... Oh, and the BS about crashing your server is just that, BS. We test the web site with all browsers, including the latest releases of Firefox and Opera and have yet to crash them. You obviously have something wrong with your configuration, since you are the only person complaining about crashing of browsers out some 35,000+ readers a day who access the main page, the 13,500 registered users who access the libraries, and over 80,000 registered users who access the library. With all those successful users, you think their might be a problem with YOUR system? Perhaps it is, perhaps it isn't. I was simply offering advice based on MY experience--experience that apparently differs from yours. That's fine. You don't have to be an ass about it. -- Kurt Weber |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
On Mon, 21 Jun 2004 23:31:37 -0500, Kurt Weber wrote:
No, I'm just curious why you posted a response which appeared to have nothing to do with my original post. I don't particularly care one way or the other; I'm just curious. Because it was on topic. Care to offer, why it was off topic? Exactly what part was offtopic? But, since this has been answered, what, three times, and I've asked questions twice that you've ignored, I doubt you'll provide anything back. Should we just tag you as a troll and move on? |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
"Greg Copeland" wrote in message
news On Mon, 21 Jun 2004 23:31:37 -0500, Kurt Weber wrote: No, I'm just curious why you posted a response which appeared to have nothing to do with my original post. I don't particularly care one way or the other; I'm just curious. Because it was on topic. Care to offer, why it was off topic? It wasn't; nor have I claimed that it ever was. It simply had nothing to do with my original post, and I was curious what it was I said that made you make the post you did so I won't be so ambiguous next time. -- Kurt Weber |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
On Tue, 22 Jun 2004 18:52:56 -0500, Kurt Weber wrote:
"Greg Copeland" wrote in message news On Mon, 21 Jun 2004 23:31:37 -0500, Kurt Weber wrote: No, I'm just curious why you posted a response which appeared to have nothing to do with my original post. I don't particularly care one way or the other; I'm just curious. Because it was on topic. Care to offer, why it was off topic? It wasn't; nor have I claimed that it ever was. It simply had nothing to do with my original post, and I was curious what it was I said that made you make the post you did so I won't be so ambiguous next time. Great troll. Get a life. End of this thread has been reached. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
"Greg Copeland" wrote in message
news On Tue, 22 Jun 2004 18:52:56 -0500, Kurt Weber wrote: "Greg Copeland" wrote in message news On Mon, 21 Jun 2004 23:31:37 -0500, Kurt Weber wrote: No, I'm just curious why you posted a response which appeared to have nothing to do with my original post. I don't particularly care one way or the other; I'm just curious. Because it was on topic. Care to offer, why it was off topic? It wasn't; nor have I claimed that it ever was. It simply had nothing to do with my original post, and I was curious what it was I said that made you make the post you did so I won't be so ambiguous next time. Great troll. Get a life. End of this thread has been reached. You can call me a troll all you want, but that wouldn't make it true. Grow up. -- Kurt Weber |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
"Kurt Weber" wrote in message
... You can call me a troll all you want, but that wouldn't make it true. Grow up. Kurt, you're wasting your time. You know his reply wasn't relevant to your post. Nearly everyone else knows it. Leave it at that. You'll never get the guy to admit it wasn't, nor is there any reason you need to. His posts speak much more loudly about what kind of guy he is than yours ever could. Pete |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
On Tue, 22 Jun 2004 20:31:30 -0700, Peter Duniho wrote:
"Kurt Weber" wrote in message ... You can call me a troll all you want, but that wouldn't make it true. Grow up. Kurt, you're wasting your time. You know his reply wasn't relevant to your post. Nearly everyone else knows it. Leave it at that. You'll never get the guy to admit it wasn't, nor is there any reason you need to. His posts speak much more loudly about what kind of guy he is than yours ever could. Pete Oh shesh Pete. Coming from a guy that is king of the trolls. You two have much in common. Troll and when asked to support your view, ignore it and keep trolling. If my comments had nothing to do with the topic at hand, feel free to submit why? As has been asked of the other troll, many times now. He's yet to offer anything. Now, another troll jumps in. That's just down right pethetic of you Pete. Talk about knowing the type of person I am; take a look at the type of person you are. The thread was pretty much closed...and you knew that. But, nope, couldn't leave your nose out of it. Nope. Not when the king of trolls has a job to do. You speak poorly of me, but notice how in other threads, in r.a.*, others have commented about you too. You might want to take a second to figure out why comment about you, such as they do. Furthermore, take a second to figure out why you felt compulsed, in a very trollish manner, to jump onto a dead/dying thread to ignite it again. What we're left is two trolls which can not support their position, another guy that simply wanted to help by offering an on topic reply, and got wacked over the head for it. Yes, I think we can all see the types of people involved here. Yep, we clearly have two trolls and a person with a desire to help. I'm such a bad, bad person for helping. Hopfully sarcasm won't be lost on you either. Shesh. Pete you really are a class act. I can't believe that you still hold a grudge because you got caught talking about computer stuff that you had clue. Then, I asked you to support your position, and you declined. So, I've asked you again now. Obviously you can't and I expect this thread to die the same death, waiting for a valid response from you. Just the same, I've asked. So, let's hear how I was off topic. Support your view. Or is off topic whinning and trolling the only thing you can do? ....laughing as I wait... |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Looking for JPI's older software to download engine monitor data to a PC | Peter R. | Piloting | 11 | February 14th 05 08:58 PM |
Link for Sectiona chart download | Toks Desalu | Piloting | 3 | December 20th 04 02:14 PM |
Anyone has the EDM700 data download software? | Jay Honeck | Owning | 3 | September 11th 04 08:56 AM |
A Requiem For Our Fallen Solders - Free Music Download | Chase The Frog | Naval Aviation | 0 | May 18th 04 09:05 PM |
FS2004 Pauses When Real World Weather Won't Download | Andrew Watson | Simulators | 1 | September 8th 03 09:08 AM |