A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Owning
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

TIS (traffic information service)



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41  
Old September 1st 06, 11:11 PM posted to rec.aviation.owning,rec.aviation.piloting
Stefan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 578
Default TIS (traffic information service)

Larry Dighera schrieb:

No, why should it?


Because the corporation providing ATC services under contract to the
government(s) thinks it's a good idea?


Obviously, they do.

Either believe it, or do the research necessary to verify the
allegation.


In this particular case, I choose to believe it. You can handle it als
you want.

Stefan
  #42  
Old September 1st 06, 11:36 PM posted to rec.aviation.owning,rec.aviation.piloting
Stefan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 578
Default TIS (traffic information service)

Andrew Gideon schrieb:

I've some difficulty understanding this.

From reading here, I've been lead to believe that aviation is more common
in the US than in the EU. Given this, I have to assume that a locality
like the KEWR/KLGA/KJJK area would have a higher aircraft density than
anywhere in Europe.

No?


Frankly, I don't know. No doubt there will be some spam can drivers who
know as little as I do about ATC who will tell you that the specialists
at Eurocontrol have no clue, that everything is better elsewhere and
that Eurocontrol's agenda is to stop all aviation in Europe anyway... an
attitude which is pretty much en vogue right now. I'm somewhat untypical
as I don't share this attitude. I frankly admit that I don't know enough
to judge their claim, so I have to believe it. I don't believe that
Eurocontrol is just a bunch of idiots and sadists.

Nonetheless some thoughts: The primary concern is not the number of
transponder codes. It's the fact that when lots of transponders which
are located near each other (angle wise) respond simultaneously, the
system breaks down. I don't have the exact numbers handy, but there is a
discrimination limit. And there have already been reports of lost
targets. (No, I won't go through the hassle to dig the report out, so
you can choose to believe or not believe in my memory.) There are some
parts in Europe which are surprisingly congested, and the airspace in
those parts tends to be extremely complex. Maybe Europeans just care
more about such lost targets than Americans? And then, they are not
saying that the traffic has already exceeded their capacity. They say it
will reach its limits soon. I think it's a responsible move to try to
proactively solve the problem before the system breaks down.

Stefan
  #43  
Old September 2nd 06, 03:02 AM posted to rec.aviation.owning,rec.aviation.piloting
Bob Noel
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,374
Default TIS (traffic information service)

In article ,
Larry Dighera wrote:

Can European airspace possibly be more congested than that in the US,
say Chicago or Los Angeles?


Enroute? yeah, I think so.

--
Bob Noel
Looking for a sig the
lawyers will hate

  #44  
Old September 2nd 06, 01:27 PM posted to rec.aviation.owning,rec.aviation.piloting
Larry Dighera
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,953
Default TIS (traffic information service)

On Fri, 01 Sep 2006 22:02:46 -0400, Bob Noel
wrote in
:

In article ,
Larry Dighera wrote:

Can European airspace possibly be more congested than that in the US,
say Chicago or Los Angeles?


Enroute? yeah, I think so.


But surely the US terminal airspace is more congested.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Aerobatics 28 January 2nd 09 02:26 PM
18 Oct 2005 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News Otis Willie Naval Aviation 0 October 19th 05 02:19 AM
NTSB: USAF included? Larry Dighera Piloting 10 September 11th 05 10:33 AM
Mini-500 Accident Analysis Dennis Fetters Rotorcraft 16 September 3rd 05 11:35 AM
12 Dec 2003 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News Otis Willie Naval Aviation 0 December 12th 03 11:01 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:55 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.