A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

C-17s as water bombers



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old November 12th 03, 02:19 AM
Morgans
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Brian Burger" wrote in message
ia.tc.ca...
C-17s dropping water balloons on fires? Cool...

... but in a Canadian aviation history book I read a while back, they
talked about early aerial firefighting attempts, including dropping paper
bags full of water on the fire. It delivered the water, but the impact of
the bag often sent sparks flying everywhere, spreading the fire while
putting out the centre bit of it.

It seems to me that the C-17+water balloon could have the same flaw. The
advantage would be that you could drop a whole LOT of the things, of
course.

Interesting, anyway. Anyone want to be that with the extra-destructive
fires in California this year there'll be more interest in firefighting
come next budget time in lots of places?

(It was a bad year in BC, too, but we've had worse, and the rest of
Canada seems to have gotten off fairly well...)

Brian.


It is surprising to me that no one has mentioned the CL-215, or CL-415. If
you are not familiar with them, go to
http://www.buffaloairways.com/Aircraft/CL-215.htm or
http://users.chariot.net.au/~theburfs/canad415MAIN.html

The biggest advantage is the super fast round trips, when a source of water
is around. They are truly amazing to see in action.

NC bought a CL-215, a couple years back. Bargain priced at one million,
while they were trading up people to the CL-415.

Another amazing thing is that it took soo long for other states and military
to get permission to go help. That stuff needs to be streamlined.
--
Jim in NC


  #12  
Old November 12th 03, 02:22 AM
Morgans
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Kevin McCue" wrote in message
...
What would be the effect of one hitting a house/car/person? I think the
current "spray" that comes down is safer to all.

--
Kevin McCue


That harmless spray, can and will collapse a roof of a house in a heartbeat.
It looks harmless, but picture a foot of rain falling in 5 seconds, and it
will come into perspective.
--
Jim in NC


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Night of the bombers - the most daring special mission of Finnishbombers in WW2 Jukka O. Kauppinen Military Aviation 4 March 22nd 04 11:19 PM
Water Cooled Jet Engines: a possibillity then and now? The Enlightenment Military Aviation 3 December 18th 03 09:41 AM
DC-10s as Water Bombers? Jay Honeck Piloting 57 November 16th 03 05:28 AM
water bombers Stew Hicks Home Built 2 September 8th 03 11:55 PM
water bombers Stew Hicks Home Built 0 September 7th 03 04:27 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:00 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.