A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Heathrow = Thrust Reversers deployed



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 19th 08, 06:33 AM posted to alt.disasters.aviation,rec.aviation.piloting
Eeyore[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 163
Default Heathrow = Thrust Reversers deployed



Bertie the Bunyip wrote:

Eeyore wrote in

The BA crew would have had to ignore EICAS to have got caught out by
fuel starvation.


Nope.


Are you saying that there wouldn't have been any low qty or low fuel
pressure EICAS alerts prior to fuel starvation / exhaustion ?

Graham

  #2  
Old January 19th 08, 06:36 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Bertie the Bunyip[_19_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,851
Default Heathrow = Thrust Reversers deployed

Eeyore wrote in
:



Bertie the Bunyip wrote:

Eeyore wrote in

The BA crew would have had to ignore EICAS to have got caught out by
fuel starvation.


Nope.


Are you saying that there wouldn't have been any low qty or low fuel
pressure EICAS alerts prior to fuel starvation / exhaustion ?


Not necesarily,

That'll be £40 fjukktard.


Bertie
  #3  
Old January 19th 08, 06:45 AM posted to alt.disasters.aviation,rec.aviation.piloting
Eeyore[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 163
Default Heathrow = Thrust Reversers deployed



Bertie the Bunyip wrote:

Eeyore wrote
Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
Eeyore wrote in

The BA crew would have had to ignore EICAS to have got caught out by
fuel starvation.

Nope.


Are you saying that there wouldn't have been any low qty or low fuel
pressure EICAS alerts prior to fuel starvation / exhaustion ?


Not neccesarily.


Define 'necessarily'.

And fix your spelling checker whilst you're at it.

Graham

  #4  
Old January 19th 08, 08:57 PM posted to alt.disasters.aviation,rec.aviation.piloting
Bertie the Bunyip[_19_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,851
Default Heathrow = Thrust Reversers deployed

Eeyore wrote in
:



Bertie the Bunyip wrote:

Eeyore wrote
Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
Eeyore wrote in

The BA crew would have had to ignore EICAS to have got caught
out by fuel starvation.

Nope.

Are you saying that there wouldn't have been any low qty or low
fuel pressure EICAS alerts prior to fuel starvation / exhaustion ?


Not neccesarily.


Define 'necessarily'.

And fix your spelling checker whilst you're at it.


MMm, on..


Bertie
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Heathrow = Thrust Reversers deployed Eeyore[_2_] Piloting 1 January 19th 08 08:58 PM
Heathrow = Thrust Reversers deployed Eeyore[_2_] Piloting 1 January 19th 08 06:35 AM
Heathrow = Thrust Reversers deployed Eeyore[_2_] Piloting 2 January 19th 08 06:33 AM
A question on reversers [email protected] Piloting 26 June 27th 06 05:31 PM
Reversers question please Dudley Henriques Simulators 2 August 11th 03 06:40 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:31 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.