If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Too fast vs too slow
Say overall speed is not an issue (you are not racing) and the only objective is to achieve best glide to make it home with a marginal final glide. Also lets assume you fail to maintain the correct speed and deviate +/- 10 knots. Which will have less penalty, flying 10 knots too fast or too slow than best glide? so for example, if best glide is 60 knots, which speed will have better chance to get you home, 70 knots or 50 knots?
Assuming stable air with no wind, but will be interested to hear opinions for other conditions. Ramy |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Too fast vs too slow
If you look at the lines on the bottom of this graph:
http://soaringcafe.wpengine.netdna-c...io-Polars1.jpg You will see the glide ratio plotted versus the speed. For every speed this diagram gives you the glide ratio for that speed. If you then look at the optimal glide point, that is the point where graphs reach their lowest point (the Y-axis is on the right for these graphs), you see that on both sides of this peak the line has roughly the same slope. This leads me to conclude that it does not really matter, for this particular aircraft at least. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Too fast vs too slow
W dniu środa, 8 maja 2013 10:02:44 UTC+2 użytkownik Roel Baardman napisał:
If you look at the lines on the bottom of this graph: http://soaringcafe.wpengine.netdna-c...io-Polars1.jpg You will see the glide ratio plotted versus the speed. For every speed this diagram gives you the glide ratio for that speed. If you then look at the optimal glide point, that is the point where graphs reach their lowest point (the Y-axis is on the right for these graphs), you see that on both sides of this peak the line has roughly the same slope. This leads me to conclude that it does not really matter, for this particular aircraft at least. Bad example - compare this polar with real Concordia performance from igc file ;-) Your opinion would have been correct if the polar was a straight line, but it isn't... |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Too fast vs too slow
On Tuesday, May 7, 2013 11:58:34 PM UTC-7, Ramy wrote:
Say overall speed is not an issue (you are not racing) and the only objective is to achieve best glide to make it home with a marginal final glide. Also lets assume you fail to maintain the correct speed and deviate +/- 10 knots. Which will have less penalty, flying 10 knots too fast or too slow than best glide? so for example, if best glide is 60 knots, which speed will have better chance to get you home, 70 knots or 50 knots? Assuming stable air with no wind, but will be interested to hear opinions for other conditions. Ramy Folks, it is a trick question. The proper answer is follow Ramy and do whatever he is doing. Darryl |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Too fast vs too slow
At least at 70 you'll get to wherever you are going faster
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Too fast vs too slow
On May 8, 1:58*am, Ramy wrote:
Say overall speed is not an issue (you are not racing) and the only objective is to achieve best glide to make it home with a marginal final glide. Also lets assume you fail to maintain the correct speed and deviate +/- 10 knots. Which will have less penalty, flying 10 knots too fast or too slow than best glide? so for example, if best glide is 60 knots, which speed will have better chance to get you home, 70 knots or 50 knots? Assuming stable air with no wind, but will be interested to hear opinions for other conditions. Ramy You can easily answer the theoretical question visually. Open your glider manual to the polar page. Draw a line from the origin to the tangent of the polar. This is the best glide line; the intersection of straight line and polar gives your best glide speed and sink rate at that speed. The slope of the line is your glide ratio. Now draw lines from the origin to a point on the polar 10 knots slower and 10 knots faster. Those lines represent directly your glide angle, which ever one is flatter is the better glide angle. Now to reality... The chance that you are doing this in exactly still air is pretty small. And if it's perfectly still air, anyone can actually hit their best glide speed, typically more like 55 dry, no? So, if you're struggling to make it home, you're likely going through rising and sinking air. Now, if there were any rising air around, you'd stop and thermal in it. So that means you're managing to neatly follow the sink. So now ask the question, in gentle sink, are you better off at "best glide" + or - 10 knots? You'll see that the 50 knot (really 45 knot) answer is a disaster. Unless you have a really good speed to fly vario set up, knowing that you're in 1 knot sink and what to do about that will escape you. So, my 2 cents: when in doubt, fly a little faster, because if you're not in lift you're in sink, and getting out of sink is important. Equivalently, fly the Mc 1 speed not the Mc 0 speed if there is any motion to the air John Cochrane |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Too fast vs too slow
Your opinion would have been correct if the polar was a straight line, but it isn't...
I was trying to say that, since the shape of the curve on both sides of the theoretical optimal point is symmetric, it does not really matter. Optimal +10kts gives roughly the same L/D as Optimal -10kts. Furthermore, I think John Cochrane hits the nail on the head here (again). Roel |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Too fast vs too slow
At 12:29 08 May 2013, Roel Baardman wrote:
Your opinion would have been correct if the polar was a straight line, but it isn't... I was trying to say that, since the shape of the curve on both sides of the theoretical optimal point is symmetric, it does not really matter. Optimal +10kts gives roughly the same L/D as Optimal -10kts. Furthermore, I think John Cochrane hits the nail on the head here (again). Roel But the polar curve is not symmetric about the point of intersection with the tangent that passes through the origin, ie the maximum glide - we're not talking about min sink here. Infact, I bet you will achieve a better glide ratio if you fly 10 knots slower than best glide than 10 knots faster (in still air). |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Too fast vs too slow
If you're really in still air, just fly at each speed (LD +/- 10 kts) for a minute or so and observe what your glide computer says. Most have a "Instantaneous L/D" display. See which LD is better for your unique situation.
Rob Dunning On Wednesday, May 8, 2013 2:58:34 AM UTC-4, Ramy wrote: Say overall speed is not an issue (you are not racing) and the only objective is to achieve best glide to make it home with a marginal final glide. Also lets assume you fail to maintain the correct speed and deviate +/- 10 knots. Which will have less penalty, flying 10 knots too fast or too slow than best glide? so for example, if best glide is 60 knots, which speed will have better chance to get you home, 70 knots or 50 knots? Assuming stable air with no wind, but will be interested to hear opinions for other conditions. Ramy |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Too fast vs too slow
we're not talking about min sink here.
This sums up my error quite nicely. Thanks for correcting me! |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Slow Down, Speed up | Robert Gaines[_2_] | Soaring | 21 | April 17th 09 09:45 AM |
AI sometimes slow to come up to speed | Peter R.[_2_] | Owning | 4 | April 12th 08 10:30 PM |
Being towed too slow? | Steve Leonard | Soaring | 23 | November 21st 07 11:19 PM |
why so slow??!! | Heino & Deanne Weisberg | Home Built | 6 | November 6th 05 06:22 PM |
Flying Slow | [email protected] | Piloting | 61 | January 17th 05 05:23 PM |